Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Aerodynamics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2012, 09:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerodynamics

Could someone please explain to my the difference between effective weight and actual weight?
Thanks
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 10:20
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
In what context?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 10:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi
I've been reading the aerodynamics section on 'the technical pilot interview' book and it came up a few times in the answers, example;
The properties that affect an aircrafts stall speed:
Weight
a.Actual Weight
b.Load factor, g in a turn
c.Effective weight/center of gravity position
How does the stall speed vary with weight:
"The stall speed will increase with an increase in the aircraft's autual or effective weight"
Thanks
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 10:52
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
At that level I'd say two factors.

(1) How much g you're pulling. In a 2 g turn, effective weight has doubled, so stall speed goes up with square root of weight.

(2) With CG, further aft CG reduces tail downforce, which reduces lift required from the mainplane, which reduces stall speed.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 10:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Effective weight =

Mass x g + tail downforce.

Tail downforce, which adds to actual weight to increase lift (and hence lift co-efficient) is affected by c of g (forward c of g requires more tail downforce).

Genghis can give the long complicated answer if required...........

(edit - I see he has, although in the original post load factor was separated out, and I think that book considers effective weight as lift required in straight and level flight).

Last edited by Fitter2; 17th May 2012 at 10:58.
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 12:31
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheers lads them explanations have helped
akafrank07 is offline  
Old 17th May 2012, 12:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 778
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
akafrank07: Just a thought. Try reading your theory textbooks thoroughly rather than trying to bone up on typical questions. That way you will be equipped to answer ANY question! Perhaps this is too "old school" for the internet generation?!
Meikleour is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 08:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so stall speed goes up with square root of weight.
Tut tut Genghis.

Surely you mean the square root of load factor.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 13:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
Well if you want me to get picky, stall speed goes up with (weight x load factor / MTOW)^aeroelastic coefficient.

For a rigid wing, aeroelastic coefficient is 0.5. For a non-rigid wing, the coefficient varies according to deformation with loading - a hang-glider can well be in the range 0.6-0.8.

That form of the equation is the Venton-Walters equation.

And you're unlikely to find that in many groundschool notes.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 18th May 2012, 13:19
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Meikleour
akafrank07: Just a thought. Try reading your theory textbooks thoroughly rather than trying to bone up on typical questions. That way you will be equipped to answer ANY question! Perhaps this is too "old school" for the internet generation?!
Also four different one-line question threads the same week, each with the title "aerodynamics" is both clumsy and lazy.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 13:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That form of the equation is the Venton-Walters equation.
And you're unlikely
to find that in many groundschool notes.
It's in my own CFS notes though.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 19th May 2012, 19:21
  #12 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Lightning Mate
It's in my own CFS notes though.
Very commendable.

This reference covers it in a bit more detail if you're interested.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2012, 19:30
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Belfast
Age: 33
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok i'll keep that in mind to elborate more on the heading, thanks for your help guys
akafrank07 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.