Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

ATPL theory questions

Old 18th Feb 2017, 14:58
  #1001 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: -
Posts: 1,176
Ok I understood why Altitude Hold controls path according to the question, to a certain extent. Moving the subscale moves only the pointers on the altimeter but the aircraft keeps flying at that same pressure outside. At least with the autopilot taken in consideration in the exam. However, I still disagree with it. Pressure levels change, a flight path would not.
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2017, 17:07
  #1002 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 433
RedBullGaveMeWings
It seems like you could just translate flight path mode into outer loop and then you would be completely all right
Originally Posted by SeventhHeaven View Post
Ah yes, the famous high quality french education system, right?

Airlines don't give a toss about your ATPL scores - They will however want you to prove how many sittings it took you (e.g. ryanair).
The ATPL exams are not included in the French education system

They really do not give a toss ? I heard flybe wanted 90% minimum.
KayPam is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2017, 17:26
  #1003 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: EU
Posts: 156
They don't care about your ATPL scores, because they know everybody with half a brain should be able to get 90%+ with the way the current exams are set up.

It's not that 95% average makes you look clever/good, it's that having 80% and a resit makes you look silly. If you know what I'm trying to say with that?
SeventhHeaven is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2017, 21:30
  #1004 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 56
With regards to getting a 90+% average in the ATPL exams and new questions frequently popping up, which question bank would you most recommend to use? Or even a combination..?
HEJT2015 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2017, 22:16
  #1005 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: -
Posts: 1,176
I am mainly using Aviation Exam on Exhaustive mode. I will also start integrating with Bristol QB, which is very good if you are sitting your exams under the UK CAA.
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2017, 17:18
  #1006 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: -
Posts: 1,176
Binary code is no mistery to me and I have some experience in programming, but curiosity strikes me now... Why is EASA asking to convert a binary code?
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2017, 18:22
  #1007 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 67
Posts: 3,748
It's a throwback from the days when you were expected to fix your own radios in the jungle......
paco is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2017, 22:53
  #1008 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 433
Hello

I just started performance
Could someone please confirm that the entire CAP698 document will be available during the exam ?
My book says things like : "this is included in CAP698 so it does not need to be learnt"

Thanks
KayPam is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 08:39
  #1009 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 60
Posts: 1,472
That would not be so in the UK. The UK CAA used to allow you to take the whole CAP in but this has not been the case for some while, now you only get an 'Annex' showing the relevant graph. Our students, therefore, do need to learn the various formulae and conversion factors. If you are sitting the exam in France you should ask the DGAC what their rules are, or ask your ATO.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 13:49
  #1010 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: -
Posts: 1,176
I am a bit confused about the following question:
For a given IAS and angle of aileron deflection, increasing altitude will:

A) increase the rate of roll [correct answer]
B) increase the rate of turn
C) reduce the rate of turn
D) reduce the rate of roll
Clearly A is correct because aerodynamic damping is less at high altitude, however, constant IAS means an increasing TAS which also reduces rate of turn.

What does examiner really want to ask here? I see two correct answers.
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 14:43
  #1011 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 60
Posts: 1,472
Not being an aerodynamicist I'd have gone for (D). I remember exactly this exercise in the Hawk when an instructor tried to convince me that the highest rate of roll occurred at altitude, when it clearly didn't. On landing I found the reference in the manual which said the optimum rate of roll was at sea level. I always assumed he had written the lesson down incorrectly on his knee pad, but who knows.

The clue might be in the 'constant IAS' phrase, you get better roll rates at high IAS at sea level but you can't make those high IAS's at height because of Mach effects. I will wait for an aerodynamics expert...
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:13
  #1012 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 433
Alex : thanks

RBGMW : You might want to derive a simplified flight mechanics formula
The rolling moment equation is (simplified)
Inertia*φ'' =(Cldl*dl + Clp pb/2v) * QSb

Any answer to a rolling question is behind this equation.
Then you just have to interpret your question.
Are we talking about the maximum achievable rate of roll ?
If yes, then phi''=0 when max rate of roll is reached and :
Cldl * dlmax = Clp pmax*b/2V

Cldl, dlmax, Clp, b are constant.
So pmax will increase if V will increase. At constant IAS, V will increase with altitude

The rate of turn is unrelated to the angle of aileron deflection.
Depending on the aircraft, you will be in a steady turn with aileron undeflected or deflected in any direction (towards the turn, outwards the turn, more directions if they existed)

So I'd go A
KayPam is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2017, 21:20
  #1013 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 60
Posts: 1,472
Thanks KayPam, that in a nutshell, is why I don't teach principles of flight! will work through it slowly tomorrow.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 07:36
  #1014 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England
Posts: 642
This question is intended to be answered by ATPL candidates, it should be possible to solve it without going beyond the ATPL syllabus.

The question is an old one (probably 16 or 17 years old), so it really should be bread and butter stuff for ATPL instructors and students.

Let’s start by looking at a few things which ATPL students should know:

1. Rolling motions are generated by the aerodynamic forces acting on deflected ailerons.

2. The magnitude of these aerodynamic forces increases with increasing angle of deflection and with
increasing dynamic pressure.

3. If we climb at constant IAS the dynamic pressure will remain approximately constant, so the rolling
forces generated by any given aileron deflection angle should also be approximately constant.

4. Rolling motions are opposed by aerodynamic damping.

5. Aerodynamic damping decreases as TAS increases.

6. Climbing at constant IAS causes the TAS to increase.

7. Radius of turn = TAS squared / g Tan AOB.

8. Rate of Turn = g Tan AOB / TAS.

9. Under normal circumstances, keeping the ailerons deflected will cause continuous
rolling motion, but will not produce a constant angle of bank.

Looking at statements 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6, we should see that climbing at constant IAS will cause roll rates at any given aileron deflection to increase (Option A).

Looking at statements 7, 8 and 9 we should see that aileron deflection does not control the rate of turn or radius of turn, so options B and C are incorrect.

At this point we may be tempted to argue that “if we fly high enough our maximum IAS will be reduced, so our maximum roll rate will be reduced. But the question specified “ constant IAS” so this excludes any altitude at which it is not possible to maintain a constant IAS. So option D is incorrect.

It is a well known fact that many of the questions used in these exams are defective, but candidates must take care to avoid being too eager to simply tell themselves “Oh this is just another duff question”. Such eagerness is likely to cause them to raise large numbers of appeals, which are subsequently rejected. If they have paid insufficient attention to selecting the best option, the result is likely to be an examination failure. Whenever a candidate thinks that two or more options are correct, their first action should be to look very carefully at why they think each option is correct.

Last edited by keith williams; 23rd Feb 2017 at 08:43.
keith williams is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 09:45
  #1015 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 60
Posts: 1,472
Thank you Keith. I suspect that the clue to my misunderstanding is indeed the IAS thing for when comparing roll rates at 420KT IAS/TAS at sea level with roll rates at 200KT IAS/420KT TAS at height the sea level roll rate would win out. Hence the statement in the flight manual that for a particular aircraft (albeit a reasonably fast little jet) the optimum rate of roll is at high IAS at sea level.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 10:46
  #1016 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 649
I agree that the correct answer is A.

Given that IAS and aileron deflection are constant it follows that:
The dynamic pressure is constant and therefore roll moment due to aileron deflection is constant.
Given that altitude increased (with IAS constant) it follows that:
TAS increased.
Steady state roll rate is achieved when roll moment is in equilibium with roll damping. And for a given roll rate, roll damping would be less at higher TAS. Therefore roll will go to a higher rate before equilibrium is reached.

As RedBull says, answer C is also tempting because the higher TAS would result in a reduced rate of turn as well. But the question does not specify any angle of bank or even that the aircraft is turning. It could be an aileron roll. So based on the information available in the question there is only one answer that is definitely correct, and that is A.
oggers is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 11:20
  #1017 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: -
Posts: 1,176
Now it's crystal clear, thanks Keith.
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2017, 20:04
  #1018 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 433
Could someone please explain ?

https://i.gyazo.com/76c101cae12e601f...777c79108f.png

Obviously, V1 can't be lower than Vmcg.
But who says one has to choose a balanced V1 ?

In this case, one would just increase V1 above the balanced value. As a result, the ASD and ASDR would increase above the one engine out takeoff distance.

Anyone has an explanation in favor of the green answer ?
KayPam is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2017, 09:43
  #1019 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England
Posts: 642
This question has been around for many years, and I recall appealing it as long ago as 2007.

The UK CAA examiners' answer at that time was "Ah but you must assume that the aircraft is taking-off at it's field limited take-off mass, so there is no space available to increase ASDR" When I pointed out that nothing in the question indicated it being a field limited take-off, there was no convincing reply. I believe that most of the schools appealed the same question and got the same response. This was quite common at the time.
keith williams is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2017, 14:34
  #1020 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: France
Posts: 433
Thanks Keith !

I will be passing (not taking ) instruments, meteorology, performance and mass and balance next week.
My books were read and all AvExam questions are answered, so my method requirements are met

However, for the next subjects to come, I'm not so sure if I should still apply the same method...
Next set of exams will be flight planning, principles of flight, and aircraft general knowledge.
For AGK, i'm pretty sure it's best to read the entire books and to do all the questions.
But flight planning seems really easy - just time consuming
And POF is sort of in the middle I think.*

I am doing the flight planning questions right now, without having ever opened the books, and I find myself answering correctly to 90-100% of the available questions..
Overall there are just the same calculations to do over and over again with few variations and little specific knowledge to have (like what are the different fuel quantities required, how long before a flight should one file a flight plan and that's pretty much all..), and then careful thinking and calculations will guarantee the correct answer..

I calculated I would be spending like 15 hours just answering AviationExam questions on this topic...

Is it really necessary to see all avexam questions ? Could there be any surprise question like there could be in a subject like AGK, instruments or meteorology ?

Fellow ATPL students, does your method include answering all the questions on the question bank ?


*Note that I'm currently working for airbus flight testing department so I'm well used to calculations and the sort of tables/graph they provide in this 33-test.

Following subjects will be human factor, gen nav and radio nav.
Will it be beneficial to have seen all the questions on these subjects ? I believe it could very well be so.

By the way, here is an advice for all distance and heading calculations of flight planning :
Instead of looking up the points and measuring your map distance then measure it against a meridian to have ground distances, like a galley slave would do, simply use the approximate or exact formula for distance computation based on the coordinates (which are given in the question) :
Pythagore (assumes earth is flat, which works very well for distances under 1000-2000 km) : 1 degree of latitude is 60nm and 1 degree of longitude is 60*cos(latitude)nm
Or, for very long distances :
D=Rt*acos(cos(lat1)cos(lat2)*cos(lon1-lon2)+sin(lon1)*sin(lon2))
Where Rt is your earth radius in the chosen unit.
(This formula is very easy to remember, just remember lat lon then 1 2, 1 2, 1 2, works just as well with 2 1, 2 1, 2 1)
And simple trigonometry (in the plane!) to get the true direction.
KayPam is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.