Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

UK NPPL to FAA CPL ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th February 2011 | 13:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: UK
UK NPPL to FAA CPL ?

Hi Guys

I have lots of flying experience, but all of it on sub-ICAO aircraft / licences. I have been looking at the options for training for an FAA CPL/IR/ME (and yes, I do know about the approaching firestorm in Europe regarding those qualifications). I can't go down the JAA route as my eyesight isn't up to scratch, but hope I could qualify for an FAA CPL via the "demonstrated ability" route.

I have a relatively easy / inexpensive route available to me to qualify for the UK NPPL(M) and / or the NPPL SSEA and to gain flying experience on either licence. If I could go down that route it would not only limit cost but would also reduce the amount of time I would have to spend in the US.

I’ve been looking in FAR AIM but I have some questions which I hope someone may be able to help with: Is there a route for converting a UK NPPL SSEA to an FAA PPL? FAR AIM refers to recognition of licences issued by ICAO-contracting states, but not to recognition of sub-ICAO licences issued by an ICAO contracting state (eg the UK NPPL SSEA) so can it be done?

If there is no conversion route, does instruction in the UK count towards the minimum 20 hours required for issue of the FAA PPL?

On the CPL front: FAR AIM refers to aviation experience in “airplanes”. Would experience on a UK Microlight count? Or a UK Group A aircraft flown on an NPPL? (For US readers, a UK Microlight is not analogous to a US “Ultralight”, it’s more like an LSA)

Hope that makes some sort of sense – if it doesn’t I’m sure you will let me know.
this is my username is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 16:22
  #2 (permalink)  
VJW
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 114
From: UK
Well basic answer is no.

You cannot get a picky back FAA PPL based on your non ICAO NPPL.

You'll need to do FAA PPL and work your way up!
VJW is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 17:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,761
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
OK let's recap:

You cannot get a FAA "piggyback" PPL in acc. with 61.75 based on a NPPL since it is not an ICAO compliant license.

Training in the UK:
For the PPL 20 hrs is required from an authorized Instructor, this being an instructor certified under 14 CFR part 61 so a FAA Instructor.
Doesn't matter where this training takes place but you do need TSA approval regardless.

As far as your hrs are concerned:
You need to meet the requirements of 61.129.
These state (amongst other things) 250 hrs of flight time
of which 50 hrs must be in airplanes.

Airplanes being: engine driven fixed wing heavier then air.

So I guess as long as it has a registration number it counts.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 18:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: uk
You need to meet the required medical standards and that includes 20/20 vision in each eye (with or without correction) for the issue of a FAA Class 2 Medical.
You only need a class 3 for the issue of a commercial certificate. The class 2 is needed to earn of course.
chrisbl is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 18:55
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thanks guys, that all helps.

If what you say is the case, it means I could learn to fly fixed-wing in the UK and build some hours (so I can make sure I have some level of aptitude) before going to the US to get an FAA PPL and go on from there.

All food for thought.
this is my username is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 19:04
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: UK
If my vision isn't up to scratch isn't a SODA an option??
this is my username is offline  
Old 4th February 2011 | 22:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 1
From: Mare Nostrum
I recommend checking out this site and contacting an AME.

Aviation Medicine Advisory Service -- FAA Medical Expertise -- Our Physicians...Your Solution!

Overall, the FAA is comparatively lenient in waivering conditions for medical certification, particularly when compared to the military or the Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) of Europe. The FAA granted 8,189 authorizations for Special Issuance in 1998. Additionally, many other pilots received eligibility letters for medical conditions that require reporting and clearance, but do not require SIA. Examples include high blood pressure on medication, kidney stones and glaucoma. Pilots with other stable conditions that did not meet FAA medical standards, such as unilateral deafness, color vision deficiencies and monocularity received Statements of Demonstrated Ability (SODA). The SODA authorizes an AME to issue a medical certificate, despite not meeting standards, without requiring periodic reports from treating physicians. The FAA may require the pilot to complete a medical flight test or simulator evaluation with a FAA Inspector prior to receiving a SODA.
zondaracer is offline  
Old 5th February 2011 | 03:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 734
Likes: 10
From: London, GB
B2N2,

Training in the UK:
For the PPL 20 hrs is required from an authorized Instructor, this being an instructor certified under 14 CFR part 61 so a FAA Instructor.
Authorized instructor includes non-FAA flight instructors giving instruction outside the US (sec. 61.41).
selfin is offline  
Old 16th February 2011 | 12:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,761
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
Selfin,

Authorized instructor includes non-FAA flight instructors giving instruction outside the US (sec. 61.41).
NO IT DOES NOT.
14 CFR 61.1 (b)(2) specifically states a ground or flight instructor certificate issued under Part 61.

You can count other flight training which is NOT required to be given by an AUTHORIZED instructor under 61.41.

Stop arguing this point already.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 17th February 2011 | 00:54
  #10 (permalink)  
VJW
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 114
From: UK
B2N2 stop being so piggy (I mean picky) with my English.....lol, must have been a long day that day!
VJW is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.