Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Does the state of licence issue really matter?

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Does the state of licence issue really matter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2007, 18:33
  #1 (permalink)  
.Aero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does the state of licence issue really matter?

There have been numerous instances where employers have favoured licences issued from certain national aviation authorities over others. Why do you think this is? What happens when you train at a reputable quality FTO based in an ICAO state where that state's national authority is seen as incompetent by the wider world, and more specifically - the west?

Should prospective trainee pilots be looking into the state of licence issue alongside what they're looking for in an FTO?

I'd like to hear opinions on the matter.
 
Old 10th Oct 2007, 18:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The idea of JAR should mean there is no difference whether you have a Spainish (for example) or UK issued licence. However, while the qualifications remain the same having had a CPL/IR issued in any state, the simple fact remains, that some NAA's are easier to deal with-with regards to admin and efficiency.

I've heard stories of it taking 3 months to have a type rating added to a non UK JAR licence, and the UK CAA do it as a same day service at no extra cost then a normal service.

(I just paid £600 for a visa for my wife to have it done on the same day instead of 3 months at a cost of £400).

You may pay more at UK CAA etc, but you tend to get a quicker service then most others!

HB
Hour Builder is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2007, 17:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the UK CAA took over 5 weeks to issue my A320 type rating.

some people told me it would take 3-4 days only.
dartagnan is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2007, 17:57
  #4 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Here we go again

There have been numerous instances where employers have favoured licences issued from certain national aviation authorities over others
Care to give specific, well documented examples of this, please? Not that it matters to me personally, mind you

the UK CAA took over 5 weeks to issue my A320 type rating.
Bah, I know of someone whose Metro type rating had already expired by the time he received it from a certain Iberian country's authority

I concur with the statement that the CAA is expensive but fairly efficient. OTOH I don't have experience with any other authorities so I'm not in a position to make comparisons.
LH2 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2007, 20:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can give examples.

If you are employed by easyjet, it's part of the contract that you convert your licence to a UK issued JAR licence from whichever you already have.

Ryanair do the same and make you convert you Irish.

HB
Hour Builder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.