Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Get your TAFs right

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2005, 02:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northampton
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get your TAFs right

G'day chaps,

I see a lot of people (including myself) looking at 'PROB30s and PROB40s' on their TAFs and remarking, "30% probability of this, 40% probability of that..." etc etc.

However I was recently enlightened/corrected to believe that this is in fact nonsense and that a '30' can be thought of as 'low probability' and a '40' as 'high probability'.

This does seem more logical for two reasons I can think of, 1) Why is it ONLY ever '30' or '40', and 2) A forecast cannot generally be absolutely certain of the future weather anyway, let alone label it with a quantitative value in the form of a percentage.

Any ideas?

Cheers, Jack.

Last edited by Halfbaked_Boy; 14th Jul 2005 at 12:39.
Halfbaked_Boy is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 07:29
  #2 (permalink)  
Gizajob
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
Age: 49
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roughly right mate. PROB40 is indeed a 40% probability. However, up to now only PROB30 and PROB40 are allowed to be quoted by international agreement. PROB40 can be thought of as more likely than a PROB30, but only a 'moderate' chance all the same. Anything more likely than that will probably(!) be forecast as a TEMPO - i.e. lasting for periods < 1 hour.

I would interpret PROB30 as relatively unlikely, but possible. It would probably not stop me going somewhere, depending on what the rest of the forecast was (you should look at the whole picture an build the weather 'story', rather than studying individual terms in the forecast IMO). PROB40 is the same, but I would pay a bit more attention, particularly if it was TS forecast.

In looking at these things in general, always remember to look at when the forecast was published - it may be several hours before you get it and looking at other sources (TV, internet, out the window etc) can and should be used to pin down forecast accuracy and likely developments.

Good question though.
EGBKFLYER is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 10:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always fly with the assumption that the very worst conditions forecast in the TAF (regardless of probability) are going to occur. That way you have the best chance to avoid getting yourself into major difficulties en-route. Local weather conditions have a nasty habit of doing things that just don't appear in the general area forecasts or in the airfield TAFs or METARs.
Maude Charlee is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 12:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always fly with the assumption that the very worst conditions forecast in the TAF (regardless of probability) are going to occur
....unless you're answering an ATPL meteorology question!!!!
Number Cruncher is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 12:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Gizajob
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
Age: 49
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ha! How true. But then we know how little resemblence to reality there is in some of those questions...
EGBKFLYER is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 13:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always try to be optimistic, and when I see Prob 30 or 40 I view it that 70% or 60% chance it aint gonna happen. But I am not completey stoopid as the mere mention of TS or CB will ensure my full attention
celtflyer is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 18:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they posted PROB50 then they would basically be saying they don't know; and where does that get anyone?
Anything higher than 50% is just an inverse of anything lower.
Clear as Mud, I thought so?

H.
hemac is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 23:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Jerez
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's my take on it:

prob 30 - it might happen but we think probably not

prob 40 - it probably will happen but might not

This seems to work really well with the Lyneham, Brize and Bristol TAFS which I rely on daily!

Cheers for now.
mysteryshopper is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.