Get your TAFs right
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Northampton
Get your TAFs right
G'day chaps,
I see a lot of people (including myself) looking at 'PROB30s and PROB40s' on their TAFs and remarking, "30% probability of this, 40% probability of that..." etc etc.
However I was recently enlightened/corrected to believe that this is in fact nonsense and that a '30' can be thought of as 'low probability' and a '40' as 'high probability'.
This does seem more logical for two reasons I can think of, 1) Why is it ONLY ever '30' or '40', and 2) A forecast cannot generally be absolutely certain of the future weather anyway, let alone label it with a quantitative value in the form of a percentage.
Any ideas?
Cheers, Jack.
I see a lot of people (including myself) looking at 'PROB30s and PROB40s' on their TAFs and remarking, "30% probability of this, 40% probability of that..." etc etc.
However I was recently enlightened/corrected to believe that this is in fact nonsense and that a '30' can be thought of as 'low probability' and a '40' as 'high probability'.
This does seem more logical for two reasons I can think of, 1) Why is it ONLY ever '30' or '40', and 2) A forecast cannot generally be absolutely certain of the future weather anyway, let alone label it with a quantitative value in the form of a percentage.
Any ideas?
Cheers, Jack.
Last edited by Halfbaked_Boy; 14th July 2005 at 12:39.
Gizajob
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: uk
Roughly right mate. PROB40 is indeed a 40% probability. However, up to now only PROB30 and PROB40 are allowed to be quoted by international agreement. PROB40 can be thought of as more likely than a PROB30, but only a 'moderate' chance all the same. Anything more likely than that will probably(!) be forecast as a TEMPO - i.e. lasting for periods < 1 hour.
I would interpret PROB30 as relatively unlikely, but possible. It would probably not stop me going somewhere, depending on what the rest of the forecast was (you should look at the whole picture an build the weather 'story', rather than studying individual terms in the forecast IMO). PROB40 is the same, but I would pay a bit more attention, particularly if it was TS forecast.
In looking at these things in general, always remember to look at when the forecast was published - it may be several hours before you get it and looking at other sources (TV, internet, out the window etc) can and should be used to pin down forecast accuracy and likely developments.
Good question though.
I would interpret PROB30 as relatively unlikely, but possible. It would probably not stop me going somewhere, depending on what the rest of the forecast was (you should look at the whole picture an build the weather 'story', rather than studying individual terms in the forecast IMO). PROB40 is the same, but I would pay a bit more attention, particularly if it was TS forecast.
In looking at these things in general, always remember to look at when the forecast was published - it may be several hours before you get it and looking at other sources (TV, internet, out the window etc) can and should be used to pin down forecast accuracy and likely developments.
Good question though.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: UK
Always fly with the assumption that the very worst conditions forecast in the TAF (regardless of probability) are going to occur. That way you have the best chance to avoid getting yourself into major difficulties en-route. Local weather conditions have a nasty habit of doing things that just don't appear in the general area forecasts or in the airfield TAFs or METARs.
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Jerez
Here's my take on it:
prob 30 - it might happen but we think probably not
prob 40 - it probably will happen but might not
This seems to work really well with the Lyneham, Brize and Bristol TAFS which I rely on daily!
Cheers for now.
prob 30 - it might happen but we think probably not
prob 40 - it probably will happen but might not
This seems to work really well with the Lyneham, Brize and Bristol TAFS which I rely on daily!
Cheers for now.




