Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Accident @ Orlando flight Training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2003, 14:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accident @ Orlando flight Training

Hi all.

....the pilot was apparently on his second solo...VERY lucky to have survived this...

Check out this for a pic of the plane - http://www.wesh.com/news/2466121/detail.html

NTSB Identification: MIA03LA179
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Tuesday, September 09, 2003 in Kissimmee, FL
Aircraft: Cessna 152, registration: N5172B
Injuries: 1 Minor.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On September 9, 2003, about 0905 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 152, N5172B, owned and operated by Orlando Flight Training Inc., lost engine power and impacted with trees during a forced landing, at the Kissimmee Airport, Kissimmee, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time, and no flight plan was filed. The local instructional flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane was substantially damaged. The student pilot reported minor injuries. The flight was originating at the time.

According to the student pilot, after taking off, and at an altitude of about 200 to 300 feet mean sea level, the airplane's engine lost power. The pilot made a 180-degree turn back to the airport, but was unable to reach the runway, and impacted with trees on the northwest corner of the airport.
vsukpadman is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 14:54
  #2 (permalink)  
ecj
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: sector 001
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why make a 180 turn back ? Was landing ahead not an option due obstacles ?
ecj is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 15:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outlawed
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why make a 180 turn back ? Was landing ahead not an option due obstacles ?
I think 'second solo' might provide an answer to that one.
strafer is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 16:06
  #4 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obviously can't comment on any particular case without knowing all the facts.

But, in general, students should not be going solo unless they are proficient at EFATO techniques. That includes landing straight ahead, or if that's not possible, a turn of up to 30 degrees. I know my PPL instructor wouldn't have sent me solo unless he was confident that I knew how to do this. And, when my PPL instructor was off sick and another instructor signed me off for solo circuits, this instructor also had me do an EFATO whilst checking me out.

Glad to hear that the injuries were only minor, and I wish the pilot a speedy recovery.

FFF
-----------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 16:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: FL390
Posts: 1,409
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
all other things aside... thank god the pilot only received minor injuries.. could have been much worse.
I did my PPL training and the airport is surrounded by tree and houses.. not many options with a dead engine at that height

Last edited by spitfire747; 12th Sep 2003 at 16:29.
spitfire747 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 16:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is another thread running at the mo on 180s, Genghis played with them and reckons he lost between 400-600ft in the turn (if I remember rightly), so would also explain why he hit the trees.

If Orlando is anything like LGB then landing ahead is certainly not an option, just about every square inch has been built on so a 180 may the lesser of two evils!
Julian is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 17:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BFS
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If thats the case must have been a tough choice! I was the same, constantly being checked on EFATO's whenever sent solo by new instructor and always the same message drummed in - don't turn back! If this guy had no choice must have been a scary experience!!
silverknapper is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 17:20
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm

difficult choice indeed...I have just returned from OFT after an IMC rating...I heard he was on 33...if so then straight ahead was the highway 192 and a big clump of trees...and lots of buildings...

Although agreed that turning back was not the correct procedure, he may well , with his limited experience have felt that he had no option....

It will be interesting to see what the cause of the engine out was though ........
vsukpadman is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 17:39
  #9 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, given the limited options for turning back, does anyone know what the instructors teach PPL students to do for an EFATO there?

FFF
-----------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 18:16
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well..

I was told ...EFATO with not sufficient runway...land straight ahead or max 30 degree turns....though the options for landing are limited, at around 2-300 ft , a 180 turn would be practically impossible.... It does raise an interesting dilemma for airfields where straight ahead is in fact NOT an option!
vsukpadman is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 19:46
  #11 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 50
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lucky man.

For future reference in the discussion, even if there is no decent landing ground ahead, turning back should not be tried in these circumstances. A controlled crash ahead is better than an uncontrolled crash. The only reason to turn away by choice that low (I agree that this student was too inexperienced to be expected not to try) is to sacrifice yourself for the lives of people on the ground.
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 20:03
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This guy is actually a 'buddy' of mine..... he is part of my C150 syndicate at Shoreham. I won't give out his name but I can confirm he's OK...... a few bumps and bruises. BUT, you'll be very pleased to know as soon as he was discharged from hospital he was back up flying. Good man !!

Of course, he'll have to put up with all the stick from the rest of the group now..... D.R, the man with more take offs than landings.

Best of luck to him.
buzzc152 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 20:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew in OFT too, glad to hear the pilots okay fair b*lls to him for getting back on the horse, thats the second plane of theirs I've flown in thats been crashed hope its not a trend.
92Alpha is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 21:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 39
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nooooooooooo!

This was the aircraft i first flew when i got to OFT, and the one i first soloed in. It holds a very special place in my heart.
While i was there, the EFATO proceadures were drilled into my head, but that was because i had an excellent instructor.

A very very sad day for me.
I considered that plane to be my plane when i was flying over there. It will be sadly missed.

Glad to hear the guy is ok though.

At 200ft, you are pretty much right over the main road into Kissimmee, and to be honest there are not too many places to land. THere is a Wallmart on the left and loads of apartments and restaurants all around. Im sure it was a tough call.

Regards

Alex

RIP N5172B
busz is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 05:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buzzc - Hi its Dave here.

Yes, I was faced with a tough choice, ahead, houses, trees, some roads with cars on them. I checked the roads some time afterwards actually, they have telegraph poles carrying mains power over the roads, poles down the sides too. There were quite a few people in cars, it was just gone 9.00am.

I know never to turn back to the same runway - I knew the procedure, It all happend soooo fast, I didnt even get a chance to get a call out to tower..

Ive done over 40 hrs passenger in C150 (we counted before I left for the US) and I know whats written, but the options were limited, as far as I could see at the time I saw a clearing and headed for it.

Needless to say I got an expensive chopper ride and hospital bill for the checkout. (2KGBP). And I couldnt see out of the window on the chopper either!

Some bruses, but Im fine. I reckon my luck was well and truly in that morning. And - yep Im continuing. Im not going to be an ATPL or nothing, just pleasure flights in the 150 I have a share in, if all goes well with the PPL.

Stay safe everyone... the guys Im learning with here reckon I should take up tree collecting as a new hobby.

edited - forgot to mention, sorry about knackering your fave plane, it really was a nice one that flew nice that was for sure

Last edited by the_ridders; 22nd Sep 2003 at 02:07.
the_ridders is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 06:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love it 2K chopper ride and you couldn't see out of the window!!, that made me laugh mate.

Certainly one to tell the boys.....

Best of luck with everything mate, glad to her you are OK!!.
TRon is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 08:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know what the statistics say...

You're safe now!
Odlix is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 13:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna Wine Country
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 9 Posts
Ridders

You have my profond admiration for your survival and getting back on the horse. Thank you for your post, not too often we see that kind of experience recounted so well.
ChrisVJ is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 17:47
  #19 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can only echo what ChrisVJ says. I don't know the field, but it doesn't sound like an easy choice. Glad you lived to tell the tale, and that you're back up again.

FFF
-----------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2003, 07:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cheers

Thanks for the kind words everyone. Appreciated.

Looking to take the skills test in next few days...
the_ridders is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.