PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   What Microlight? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/374473-what-microlight.html)

Chef du Jours 19th May 2009 08:34

What Microlight?
 
Morning

Grandma, bless her and may she Rest In Piece, has left me some money which I am looking to use to purchase a microlight. My research has narrowed the choices down to 3 - the YLAC WT9 Dynamic; Ikarus C42 and EV97 TeamEurostar. Of course, I'll be arranging a test flight in each of these 3, but also wondered if anyone had any comments on my final 3 (flown in them, or better still own them); and have I missed another bird worth considering?

Any input gratefully appreciated.

CdJ.

javelin 19th May 2009 08:40

Champ, Cub, Jodel, Luscombe, Emeraude or anything else that doesn't have a snowmobile engine and has some character :E

chevvron 19th May 2009 08:50

To be realistic, depends what you want to do. For cross countries. you could look at a Shadow DD, but if you just want a fun machine, an AX3 or AX2000 takes some beating.

Shoestring Flyer 19th May 2009 09:01

Have you considered a Sportcruiser? Ok so you may have to build it (put it together) but its no big deal.

ExSp33db1rd 19th May 2009 09:10

He asked for Microlights. Do your choices fit into the microlight category in the UK, javelin ? ( I presume UK is involved ? )

Many of us are restricted to microlights as we can no longer meet the requirements for a Class 2 medical cert. that is a necessity with the PPL that is mandatory for your choices in NZ, javelin, hence our involvement with "microlights" ( LSA I guess, really )

Their 'snowmobile' engines are superior to, more economical than, more reliable than, and easier to handle than many 'Spam Can' 1940's technology engines that I have experienced - and you don't need licensed aeronautical maintenance engineers who charge like wounded bulls, to change the oil and plugs. ( at least not in NZ )

First of all - 2 of the options are low wing, and the third is high wing, so make that decision.

Which construction type do you prefer ? The Dynamic is carbon fibre, and the Euro Star metal I believe ?

My aero club started with a Tecnam, which is basically aluminium with both fabric and 'plastic' additions, but we damaged two fuselage stringers and when buying my own syndicate machine, we went for wood and fibreglass, like a boat, and are delighted with the ALPI Pioneer - 300.

With V.P. prop. retractable gear, 130 kts, cruise, 15 litres/hr consumption, and 4 hours endurance with 2 up and baggage, it doesn't deserve the name ' microlight' and beats the 152's and 172's that are around hands down. And it is fun to fly.

My only experience of the EuroStar was a model known here as the Sportcruiser - same manufacturer. It was lovely to fly, and had a wide cockpit, but it had a heavy empty tank weight, so 2 people and fuel for any distance might be a challenge - do the sums. Not especially fast, either.

A colleague has a Dynamic, loves it, just fitted long range tanks and enhanced wings, with winglets - not quite NZ - UK nonstop, but watch this space !! Hurtles along at around 140 kts most times.

Best of luck, you'll love whatever you choose.

Rod1 19th May 2009 09:52

Non of the following are Micros (in the UK);

Champ, Cub, Jodel, Luscombe, Emeraude, Pioneer – 300, Sportcruiser

You have chosen a slightly odd mix. The Dynamic is a carbon hot ship which will tour at 120kn, the Ikarus C42 and the EV97 TeamEurostar are capable of around 85kn. Watch the useful load on all three! The C42 and EV97 are both used extensively as trainers, and are direct competitors. The Dynamic is in a different class speed wise and competes with the CT and MCR01 ULC. All three can be factory built or home built.

Go fly as many different types as you can. Talk to real owners and take your time!

Good luck,
Rod1

xrayalpha 19th May 2009 12:21

Please don't buy a C42 second-hand - because I'm trying to buy another one!

larzabell 19th May 2009 12:22

I done 25 hours in the ev97. It has great visibilty and a sporty responsive feel. I quite liked it but chose a jabiru in the end.

katana 1 19th May 2009 13:52

You can not compare the Jab to a Eurostar very compact very uncomfortable
and no toe brakes. we are on our second Eurostar knocks the socks off of all
the others and it looks like an aeroplane and not something put together with
Fabric.
If you are looking for speed and twitchy go for the Bambi and hope it don't fall apart.

Rans Flyer 19th May 2009 13:53

You could go for the 100kt cruising Jabiru.
Cheaper than all 3 as well.

I can get from Deanland to Abbeville and back on £28.

ex. Rans flyer ;-)

Flight for Life.

katana 1 19th May 2009 14:02

And a sore @rse

Rans Flyer 19th May 2009 14:11

"You can not compare the Jab to a Eurostar"
This is VERY True,
1. A ready to fly Jabiru is £11,500 less than the Eurostar.
2. The Jabiru's Vno is 15mph faster.
3. The Jabiru is stronger (+9g as opposed to +6)
4. The Jabiru's cabin is 1" wide than the Eurostar.

This is why when it comes to UK spec microlights the Jabiru still holds the records for Altitude, Economy and Speed (2 x records).

Also, you an paint the Jabiru microlight without it going over the weight limit ;-)

Don't get me wrong the Eurostar is a very nice plane, but £££ for Knots nothing comes close to a Jabiru. Simple as that.

katana 1 19th May 2009 14:34

All very good but you still got the sore @rse
I rest my case :)

Rans Flyer 19th May 2009 14:39

Depends how big your @rse is!
I find the soft leather seats in my Jab are great.
It's not my @rse thats the problem it's my bladder, I could never use the 6 hours endurance of the Jab, I'd have to come down for a pee!

http://www.flightforlife.co.uk/tiny-jab.jpg

katana 1 19th May 2009 17:17

Sorry but from the front it looks like one of natures swimmers

Rod1 19th May 2009 17:22

Rans mate, very nice aircraft.

Chef du Jours, did we help, or do you need more?

Rod1

Rans Flyer 19th May 2009 18:48

I've always thought the Eurostar looked a bit like.....

http://iyokobat.files.wordpress.com/...rry-dvorak.jpg

or

http://flight.cz/cricri/photos/FR-Fr...e_secchi_3.jpg


Hello Rod1, Different thread, same old conversation eh! ;-)

katana 1 19th May 2009 20:03

I like it.:ok:

patowalker 19th May 2009 20:15

Rans Flyer,

You really need to catch up. It now looks like this

EuroStar SL - Great Light Aircraft, Now Even Better

pato

katana 1 19th May 2009 21:16

RF
Bet you would swap for that one.:p

jonkil 19th May 2009 21:51

Rod 1 summed it up pretty well.
I fly the C42 100hp microlight. I like it, I like it a lot, enough that I fly 200+ hours a year, over Europe and the UK regularly, I am based in Ireland.
I find it a very capable touring aircraft. Regarding the engine issue, you will hear the snide remarks as stated earlier, just ignorance on the part of the poster and you can disregard this type of crap, they will grow up and learn yet !
This type of topic comes up all the time, which one is better?
They are all good, they do the job slightly differently, a few questions:
Do you want a high wing or low wing, high wing are easier to hangar in a congested environment and less likely to suffer hangar rash.
The C42 has astounding short field ability, can operate easily from 200 metres of grass and still offers a pretty good cruise of 80 knots plus.
Is an all metal aircraft important, then the Eurostar it is.
If speed is important then some of the faster composite stuff is the job, remember you have given yourself a wide budget mark, The C42/Eurostar league is 35K plus up to 80K for the upper end, it may be prudent to decide your budget first.
I have owned Rans/C42's/Eurostars and have flew quite a lot of others, I still choose the C42 on the criteria I judge it by, but that is very much my criteria hence my choice.
Rod's idea is good, talk to owners/pilots, get a trip in as many as possible, but bear in mind that each owner will probably give you a biased view of the type they fly. The jabiru aircraft is also fine, it is roomier than it looks and has a good speed envelope, but one of my judging criteria was that it had to be a Rotax 912 engine, from experiences gained by being an aircraft inspector and check pilot. I have seen numerous 912's with over 2000 hours on them, they are superb. There is a reason why those type of aircraft is holding the superb s/h value, it is simply operating/owning costs, and the ability to operate from short strips, couple this to the fact that they leave the older spam sans in their wake and there is simply no contest, just look and see how much old stuff is in the classifieds at dirt money.
By the way, I have a couple of C42's on my books should you be interested ;)

ExSp33db1rd 20th May 2009 01:06


Non of the following are Micros (in the UK);

Champ, Cub, Jodel, Luscombe, Emeraude, Pioneer – 300, Sportcruiser
Wot's the UK criteria pls ?

In NZ it's 544 Kg ( 1200 lbs) - unless amphibian when it goes up to 600 Kg. but V.P. and retractable u/c permitted, but no night flying or flight over towns ( might restrict you a bit in the UK !! )

In the USA I believe the limit is 1300 lbs but only fixed gear, and they call them Light Sports Aircraft.

patowalker 20th May 2009 07:04

In most of Europe it is 450kg.

In the UK there is also a maximum empty weight, defined as 450kg minus two 86kg pilots, minus 1 hour's fuel at MCP. For a Rotax 912 powered aircraft this usually means 268kg.

Rans Flyer 20th May 2009 08:53

There's no such thing as a perfect aircraft, an aircraft with superb short field performance is normally a bit slower in the cruise because of the hight lift wings, etc. They are ALL nice, and have both excellent, and not so excellent features. It's all about budget. If you have 10K in your pocket you are not going to get a 747.

My personal favourite microlight is an MCR-01.
Would I prefer to have it instead of my Jabiru? Answer = YES. But my 200H Jabiru is worth about 25K and a similar S/H MCR-01 would set me back over £50K, and If I had a spare £50K for an aircraft I would buy a J430 instead. So it's just not going to happen!

BTW, the SL does look nice Pato, and yes katana I would change my jab for one, but only if someone gave me the extra £30,000 difference in cost. But then I'd sell it and buy a J430 like this......
http://www.airteamimages.com/pics/76/76267_big.jpg

Chef du Jours 20th May 2009 09:10

Chaps

Many thanks for all the input, very useful indeed, quite alot to think about, but heh a nice position to be in.

I'm going to give the Eurostar and Dynamic a go first as looks and performance are pretty important to me and both seem to score highly.

I'll come back at some point and let you know how I get on but in the meantime, thanks again.

CdJ.

bingoboy 20th May 2009 10:24

The Pioneer 200 microlight has a certain style

Rod1 20th May 2009 10:40

This is not the micro version, but there is very little difference externally.

G-KARK

Rod1

Rans Flyer 20th May 2009 11:25

Nice, really nice!
Rod you have got to take me for a ride in it.

Rod1 20th May 2009 13:12

I would be very happy to swap rides. I have flown most of the aircraft in this thread, but my experience with the Jab was with a vary early mk1 which is probably not very representative of the current fleet.

Rod1

Rans Flyer 20th May 2009 13:26

Well there has been a few changes over the early ones.
Mine has the long fuselage, full height rudder and winglets.

http://www.flightforlife.co.uk/winglets.jpg


Dave Almay is hosting a Jabiru & Rans fly-in at Fenland this weekend.
I'm not sure what day I going yet (I'll need to check the weather), but if your around...... ;-)

dstevens 22nd May 2009 14:47

I own and fly a Dynamic.........

Barshifter 22nd May 2009 16:33

Go for a total change!!

Convert to Flexwing and save yourself a fat load of money.New flexwings cruise 100mph with the wind in your hair for half the price of the 3 axis machines you mentioned.

Just about the best fun you can have with your clothes on.

rjtjrt 24th May 2009 23:26

dstevens

Can you give your impressions of the Dynamic? What model?
Pros and cons so far.
How long have you had it, and Pros and Cons/likes and dislikes so far. Any problems.
Real world performance.
Looks to be a very impresive aircraft on paper.
John

tangovictor 25th May 2009 00:36

Chef
I was in a similar situation, I learnt to fly in a EV97 Eurostar, nice machine
then I decided to try every machine I could, all have good & not so good points, a lot depends of which you trained in
I eventually brought a Dynamic, similar to fly to the EV97, although faster more comfortable, more room etc,
I would suggest you try as many as you can, make a short list, then, pay for an hours lesson in each, not with the seller,
if you'd like any futher info, feel free to pm me, with telephone number,

rjtjrt 25th May 2009 01:32

As per post 33
any pilot and/or owner reports on Dynamic would be of interest
John

tangovictor 26th May 2009 00:08

wt9
 
Dynamic WT9 great machine, very few vice's, except the price
with the Euro exchange rate even worse, I notice your in Australia
I think, they are available via the NZ importer,
unlike the UK you can have retractable landing gear / extra fuel tanks
etc, I am very pleased with mine. :ok:

hhobbit 30th May 2009 20:56

I like my CTSW...
YouTube - G-CETH Touch and Go, Limetree Co. Laois, Ireland
very roomy, not everyone likes the looks, but the view out is unsurpassed

KeyPilot 31st May 2009 13:24

Dynamic
 
The best UK microlight can't be in serious doubt. A friend bought one of the first, I've flown it quite a bit myself now, it's truly awesome:

http://cdn-www.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!/aviati.../8/1523853.jpg

XXPLOD 31st May 2009 22:10

I currently fly both the C42 and Eurostar out of Popham. Both very good planes. The C42 is in some ways more refined, e.g. electric trim, a handbrake (the Eurostar doesn't have one!).

The Eurostar has it's flaws, the lack of a parking brake, the trim is a little 'blunt' and not well positioned but you forgive it all of that as it is the better of the 2 to fly. Lighter in aileron and feels more sporty. Probably slightly more challenging to fly than the C42, it can float down the runway. The perspex canopy is great for vis but it can get a tad warm in there on a hot day.

dstevens 1st June 2009 08:56

WT9 Dynamic
 
I can confirm the other two comments about the Dynamic....absolutely fantastic to fly, top class build quality and finish, almost viceless. Real world cruise for me is 100 to 115kts, more economical at 90 if duration is the target, slightly less forgiving in the landing than the EV97 if you are too fast, but easy to sort out. I owned a factory build Eurostar for 2 years before the Dynamic, and would not swap back for any money.

Bear in mind the UK derivative is slighly different than the rest of world version, due to 450kg MTOW...so no extra bits like winglets and retracts.

And buying in the UK is quite painful.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:53.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.