PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   VMC on top - are you VFR? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/108130-vmc-top-you-vfr.html)

tmmorris 7th Nov 2003 16:59

VMC on top - are you VFR?
 
A recent flight got me thinking about this one again. I think I know the answer...

If you are IMC rated and flying in VMC on top, maintaining adequate clearance from the clouds vertically and horizontally, can you be VFR? My understanding is yes, you can, as an IMC-rated pilot is exempt from the 3000viz/in sight of surface requirement, and only needs ICAO VFR minima.

The recent flight? I was IFR out of Oxford towards Wolverhampton SpacePort at FL45. FL45 was nicely between two cloud layers... then the clouds started to rise up. I stayed at FL45 and went into IMC, but it would have been nicer to climb to, say, FL50 or so - but that would have been an incorrect level for IFR, so I would have needed to be VFR to do it.

Tim

FlyingForFun 7th Nov 2003 17:06

My understanding is the same as yours - you can be VFR. But I'm not 100% certain on that one.

However, in the example you give, FL50 would not have given you adequate separation from clouds to be flying VFR (1000' vertically at altitudes of 3000' and higher), so you would have been stuck with IFR in any case.

FFF
---------------

tmmorris 7th Nov 2003 17:07

Good point. I need to re-learn VFR minima, as in practice all my VFR flying has been low enough to be 'clear of clouds and in sight of surface'.

Tim

IO540 7th Nov 2003 17:40

AFAIK you can indeed be "VFR" if VMC on top and with the IMCR, but there isn't any point that I can think of, since calling yourself "IFR" to ATC makes it far more likely you will get a RIS, overhead transits on large airfields, etc. "IFR" flights are treated as knowing what they are doing and you get a lot less hassle :O

desafinado 7th Nov 2003 17:50

Check out this link, should give you some of the answers.

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/64/DAP_ACD_3_VFR_Airspace.pdf

As long as you meet those criteria, you are VFR - your IMC rating does not change the VFR minima and doesn't come into it when deciding VFR or not. As soon as you don't have those VFR in flight conditions any more, you're IMC.
So, the question to your answer is yes, you can have VFR on top, even as a VFR pilot only. Not for you on your recent trip though, because you were IFR (and having filed a flight plan etc.). In that case nothing changes, whether you're in cloud or not, unless you decide to cancel IFR and continue VFR.

Happy flying,
des

tmmorris 7th Nov 2003 18:43

That's a fantastic document, particularly the chart - thanks, Desafinado. I can't think why I haven't come across it before - it would be invaluable for training. I was forgetting that above 3000ft you can't get away with being clear of cloud - you need specific separation vertically and horizontally.

Tim

IO540 7th Nov 2003 21:04

desafinado

I am not sure that makes sense. The IMC Rating allows you to call yourself "VFR" down to 1500m. Below that you have to call yourself "IFR" (and are in IMC).

However ATC don't generally care whether you are IMC or VMC. You tell them whether you are flying VFR or IFR.

With a PPL only, "VFR" is 3000m min.

(AIUI)

englishal 8th Nov 2003 00:23

Basically the IMCR removes the "in sight of the surface" restriction in the ANO, so if you comply with VFR minima above the cloud, then yep you are VFR

EA

Justiciar 8th Nov 2003 21:56


The IMC Rating allows you to call yourself "VFR" down to 1500m
I think you will find that you are only VFR if you can meet the VFR minima set out in the Rules of the Air. Being VFR has nothing to do with what sort of licence or rating you have. If you cannot comply with the VFR minima then you have to fly IFR. Thats why the 1000' feet above the highest object within 5 miles of track is taught for the IMC rating. The actual visibility will determine whether you can remain within the privileges of your licence or rating. Because you are "VMC on top" does not in fact mean you are or should be flying under VFR. You may in fact have to fly IFR. For example, above 3000' you may have less than 5km visibility, which requires you to fly IFR, even in uncontrolled air space.

tmmorris 9th Nov 2003 02:25

Not to be contentious, but...

above 3000ft if you had <5k vis you'd be in IMC, technically, n'est-ce-pas?

Tim

CE525 9th Nov 2003 04:49

VFR on top is no problem in the USA, it has nothing to do with the type of licence a pilot has. In a couple of European countries vfr on top is prohibited.:8

Flyin'Dutch' 9th Nov 2003 14:56

In the US VFR on top is an IFR clearance.

So only available for those with in IR.

FD

bookworm 9th Nov 2003 15:22


In a couple of European countries vfr on top is prohibited.
Out of interest, which ones?

2Donkeys 9th Nov 2003 17:10

If only a pound were given to charity every time this came up on Pprune. :D It is only about 3 weeks ago that VFR on top and VFR over the top were sorted out last time (FAA).

Here in Europe, plenty of places prohibit VFR flight over a covered layer under different circumsntaces.

For example, at Night, the rules of VFR in France change to prohibit flight above a covered layer. Other countries prohibit VFR flight in a control zone above a covered layer. I don't recall any country that prohibits it as a matter of course though. Where did you have in mind Ce525?

2D

Timothy 9th Nov 2003 18:48

IO540

but there isn't any point that I can think of
Avoiding route charges.

W

bookworm 9th Nov 2003 23:34


For example, at Night, the rules of VFR in France change to prohibit flight above a covered layer. Other countries prohibit VFR flight in a control zone above a covered layer. I don't recall any country that prohibits it as a matter of course though.
Just this once, I'm genuinely interested in the data and I'm not trying to pick a fight for the sake of it :)

I've downloaded GEN1.7 (National Differences from ICAO) from a number of AIPs (France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Sweden) and I can't find any evidence of that. Germany does prohibit VFR on top in class G, which only exists below 2500 ft agl.

France doesn't seem to change its rules of the air for night VFR, but since night VFR is effectively by exemption on particular routes, it may be that all the permissible night VFR routes have an 'in sight of the surface' restriction -- can't find it though.

The only state I ever found that prohibited VFR on top was South Africa.

2Donkeys 10th Nov 2003 00:16

France achieves the effect by specifying weather minima for night flight that place a minimum altitude on each enroute itinerary, and by insisting that the ceiling (as per the usual definition) is forecast to be at least 1500 feet above the intended cruising level.

The details are contained in Annex 1 to the "Arrêté du 20 juin 2001 relatif au vol de nuit en avion selon les règles de vol à vue."


2D

WelshFlyer 11th Nov 2003 22:16

Which brings up that much talked-about topic: Can you fly VMC an night? The answer is yes. Providing you are in sight of the ground. (so I was told, I have no night hours in my book, so I coulden't say)

WF.

Justiciar 12th Nov 2003 01:40


Which brings up that much talked-about topic: Can you fly VMC an night?
No, because all night flying is under IFR. The authority for this is Rule 22(2) of the Rules of the Air. The only exception to this when you are authorised for a Special VFR flight in Controlled Zone.

matspart3 12th Nov 2003 03:18

Justiciar/Welsh
Big and common misunderstanding. Although you have to fly IFR at night, you can remain VMC. If there's no cloud in the sky you don't have any choice!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.