Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Haven't flown in ages

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Haven't flown in ages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2003, 19:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK and Poland
Age: 60
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rustle

Re: "These sorts of discussions never cease to amaze me." - you have a very low amazement threshold my friend!

As I said it my post - it was a "pedantic (and perhaps largely academic)" question and no-one has at any point suggested that it is a SENSIBLE thing thing to do - I thing we are all grown up here and the fact that a pilot must at all times make informed and sesnible decisions I would have hoped could be taken as read. I was just trying to clarify a legal point.

By the way, is it true re: Piper Malibu? Why should it be - I know it has a 350 hp turbo-charged high-performance engine, but so do some other SEPs And where does it say so - it's not mention in any air law docs I have come across (he asks nervously, fearing that someone will jump on his back again for asking a question ).
piotr is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2003, 20:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Piotr

The requirement was introduced when it transpired that a lot of new owner operators where killing themselves with their newly acquired mounts.

I dont think that people get jumped on here, sometimes however people get a bit of a robust prod.

FD

Rustle: Can you unedit your post? You must have edited that when I was tinkering with mine and my 'puter went belly up in the process. Did your post contain the info on how to get the prize?

Last edited by Flyin'Dutch'; 31st Jan 2003 at 03:35.
Flyin'Dutch' is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2003, 21:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Exeter
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All good and very sound advice.

However try not to get caught out by the Certificate of Experience rules as I did last time round. I had – quite wrongly – assumed that the 12 hours (including 1 hour with an instructor) had to be completed in the preceding 24 months instead of the preceding 12 months. Consequently, I had to take a Certificate of Test and some considerable expenses.

Having said that, I thoroughly enjoyed the process and as always gain benefit from flying with an instructor and then examiner although I am not prepared to spend the same amount of money this time (equates to about 3 hours solo flying when taking into account the test fee….)
ajsh is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 06:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
piotr

My apologies - I read (into?) your post that the pedantic bit referred to the T'n'Gs counting as T/O&Ls, rather than the C152 time allowing Bonanza time

Ref the Piper Malibu, it is a seperate rating much like the MEP is a seperate rating, and the rule is quite clear that the 3 T/O&L must be in the same type or class of aircraft.

FD

Post re-edited. The prize you can collect anytime you like - it consists of one year of you paying for my flying
rustle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.