Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Enhancing SA with type-specific call signs

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Enhancing SA with type-specific call signs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th September 2023 | 20:51
  #61 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
" until the first non-G enters the frequency." I'm astonished that I have to point out that IMHO any non-G in a G-reg environment should obviously call Delta or Foxtrot or whatever. I did rather assume that was blindingly obvious.........
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2023 | 08:34
  #62 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
The last specific question you asked me was "So are we also inserting an encyclopaedic knowledge of the Cessna product catalogue past and present into the licence syllabus?" I replied "I don't think you need an encyclopaedic knowledge of anything to tell the difference between a white Cessna and a red Piper.

The point of starting this thread was to canvas opinion, my personal primary point is that "Golf" does literally nothing, and yet everyone uses it. Unlike far too many in aviation, I'm very much open to changing my mind, and will always question why things are done. It comes with my job. Initially I thought "Skyhawk CD" might be useful (and it irrefutably is more useful than G-CD) but reading the responses of some experienced aviators on here I now think "white Cessna CD" is better. The funniest response so far was that we say Golf, and should continue to say Golf, because its a 'convention'.
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2023 | 17:03
  #63 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 518
Likes: 16
From: Luton
We say Golf, and should continue to say Golf, because it’s a 'convention'.
Precisely! The Convention on International Civil Aviation, drafted in 1944 by 54 nations lead to the ICAO which established the core principles permitting international transport by air. Because it related to international air transport the ICAO call sign standard includes the nationality character(s). As private flyers not engaging in international air transport it is, indeed, irrelevant most of the time, but the state expects us to conform to ICAO standards in this matter - because of the convention.
Jim59 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 13:48
  #64 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 301
From: In front of a computer
Better tell the Kiwis as they don’t even paint “ZK” on their aircraft.



ETOPS is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 14:10
  #65 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
"Because it related to international air transport the ICAO call sign standard includes the nationality character(s)." Errrrr, Jim59, when a United Airlines 777 is approaching Heathrow (or indeed, anywhere) you surely don't believe that their callsign is "November Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta" do you? Because it most definitely is not. Nor do the pilots include any aspect of "the nationality character(s)" - they would call "United 123 Heavy" (or similar). Conventions, eh? Who knew?

Last edited by DaveUnwin; 13th September 2023 at 15:20.
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 14:12
  #66 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
Good point, well made ETOPS!
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 17:35
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 10
From: Ansião (PT)
Originally Posted by DaveUnwin
Good point, well made ETOPS!
No point at all. One swallow doesn't make spring, and one example doesn't make a general rule.
See here for just one counter-example. I bet I could find many many more.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 19:48
  #68 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
I think ETOPS point was referring to the previous (and spurious) claim re the state expecting ICAO conventions to be mandatory, when (for the reasons both ETOPS and I have demonstrated quite clearly) they aren't. Hope this helps.
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 20:09
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 10,574
Likes: 800
From: Northumberland
Your original comment was

in my most recent column I opined that situational awareness in the circuit would be enhanced if pilots used “Warrior Charlie Delta or “Skylane Charlie Delta” rather than “Golf Charlie Delta.
My point is that most GA pilots hearing "Warrior Charlie Delta" or “Skylane Charlie Delta” would go "What the f*** is he on about" - what we want is clarity rather than confusion

I think its more that if I heard Microlight CD and could only see a helicopter I would keep looking whereas if I heard G-CD and saw a flying machine I would assume that was G-CD. That’s the point some people refuse to accept. There’s some interesting points being raised which I like but I will always contend that Golf adds nothing when every other aircraft on freq is also calling Golf! All IMHO of course
What if there are two Microlights in the circuit? You still don't know you are looking at the right one.
SWBKCB is online now  
Reply
Old 13th September 2023 | 20:22
  #70 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
No, but if there's two microlights, a motor glider and a helicopter you've narrowed it down. If all four aircraft call "Golf" you're literally none the wiser, are you? Perhaps just accept this is a point some people simply refuse to accept, and you're one of them? Its been my experience, that in a REALLY busy mixed use circuit it helps - which is why I like it. What do you fly, BTW?
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2023 | 12:17
  #71 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 57
From: Surrey, UK ;
But when LHR hear the call "United 123". he has a flight plan, LHR have the detail and there is a squawk on Radar. Not too difficult to confuse.

I am quite happy that if I rock up at Goodwood and say "Goodwood; good morning BUIK" and they say "IK pass your message" and I say "green PA-28 IK inbound to land" that makes everybody's life just that smidgin easier.
Dave Gittins is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2023 | 12:51
  #72 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
"But when LHR hear the call "United 123". he has a flight plan, LHR have the detail and there is a squawk on Radar. Not too difficult to confuse."
I'm very aware that United 123 would not come as surprise to Heathrow Approach, but I think you've missed the point Dave Gittins, go back a bit to the post about conventions - that's the point I and ETOPS were addressing. And you're right that telling everyone on Goodwood's freq that 'IK is a green PA-28 does make everyone's life a bit easier!
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2023 | 21:03
  #73 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
Four aircraft are in an uncontrolled circuit. One calls "Golf Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta" the next "Golf Bravo Charlie Delta Alpha, the next "Golf Charlie Delta Alpha Bravo the last "Golf Delta Alpha Bravo Charlie". How do you know which one is which? Now, there are another four aircraft in another uncontrolled circuit. One calls "Yellow Cub Charlie Delta", the next "blue biplane Charlie Delta, the next "helicopter Charlie Delta" and the last "Spitfire Charlie Delta" Now you know exactly which one is which, even though they have very similar registrations. I don't think I can make it any clearer.

Last edited by DaveUnwin; 4th October 2023 at 21:20. Reason: Typos!
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 05:16
  #74 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 3
From: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
There's a Youtuber called Dan Gryder. Not everyone likes him but he's recently done some stuff on this subject. His big thing is instead of people just making announcements, even using Dave's examples above, ask questions of the other pilots i.e.
"blue biplane Charlie Delta, from yellow cub Charlie Delta are you about to turn final?"
"no, not yet, I see you at the hold, you've time to depart"
Check out his video flying a Cherokee, lots of good APQ stuff in it.
We talk to each other in the circuit quite a lot, like that. Dan's point is that asking questions greatly increases the chance of getting meaningful information, rather than just " blue biplane Charlie Delta downwind".

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 07:57
  #75 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
That makes FAR too much sense TOO. Doubtless someone will be along shortly to quote CAP413, ICAO or the ANO to claim why its a bad idea.....
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 09:40
  #76 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,395
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Originally Posted by Discorde
On a similar topic, another 'waste of bandwidth' is the superfluous 'one' when saying VHF frequencies, and possibly the 'decimal' too, especially since the cumbersome 8.33 frequencies added extra digits. Example of simplified RT:

'Call Stansted Radar two zero six two five.'
Military aircraft use both VHF and UHF. Thus any direction to a VHF frequency between 122.5 and 137.0 with a dropped fist digit could be confused with a UHF 225-370 frequency.
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 13:08
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 10
From: Ansião (PT)
"blue biplane Charlie Delta, from yellow cub Charlie Delta are you about to turn final?"
"no, not yet, I see you at the hold, you've time to depart"
That's totally unnecessary and thus a waste of bandwidth. When you're (on a non-controlled field) at the threshold and ready to go, check the airspace. If any plane on final or perhaps long final (where allowed), wait until landed/gone. Otherwise "line up and immediate departure". It doesn't get any simpler.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 18:39
  #78 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 174
From: England
Originally Posted by BEagle
Military aircraft use both VHF and UHF. Thus any direction to a VHF frequency between 122.5 and 137.0 with a dropped fist digit could be confused with a UHF 225-370 frequency.
Easily resolved:

'Contact Lyneham Director Uniform Three Zero Zero Four Seven Five.'

Discorde is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2023 | 08:16
  #79 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 345
Likes: 59
From: Lincolnshire
Thanks for all the feedback. GASCo's Editorial Office is still receiving letters, emails and even the odd phone call - which is great, plus the debate here. I've managed to condense some of the mail down to two pages in the current Flight Safety Magazine, and have enjoyed reading every single one. In a nutshell, experienced pilots, those based at uncontrolled airfields and farm strip flyers can all see how flight safety and situational awareness are enhanced by calling "blue biplane Charlie Delta" not "Golf Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta". Inexperienced pilots and those who fly from controlled fields seem to struggle with the concept.
DaveUnwin is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.