Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Revalidate SEP rating

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Revalidate SEP rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2020, 09:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Revalidate SEP rating

Hi guys / gals ,

posting here as I am being given conflicting information .
I’m looking to renew my SEP rating after many years away from it ( it’s expired by about 5 years I think)
I hold a full ATPL with about 10000 hours , I understand that I need to do some training flights and a flight check as well .
is there a specific amount of training that I need to do ? Can this training be done with a normal FI ?
do I need a FE with specific privileges to do the check ?
many thanks for your help
Jonnyknoxville is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2020, 22:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As has been stated many times here, the best advice is to go and visit your local flying school/club. They will be able to tell you what needs doing. A regular SEP instructor and examiner is what you need, based at a Declared Training Organisation. I hope the conflicting advice isn't coming from your local club!

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2020, 07:20
  #3 (permalink)  
460
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The rules are clear and straightforward (assuming you are in EASA-land),
finding the one for you, however, can be a right challenge.

Google: 'FCL.740'

Bit of jargon helps: right now you are looking to RENEW your expired rating.
Sort things out before expiry - always less painful - and it is called REVALIDATION.

Cutting to the chase, here is the actual requirement:

FCL.740 Validity and renewal of class and type ratings
...
(b) Renewal. If a class or type rating has expired, the applicant shall take the following steps:
(1) pass a proficiency check in accordance with Appendix 9 to this Annex;
(2) prior to the proficiency check referred to in point (1), take refresher training at an ATO, where necessary to reach the level of proficiency to safely operate the relevant class or type of aircraft. However, the applicant may take the training:
(i) at a DTO or at an ATO, where the expired rating was a non-high-performance single-engine piston class rating, .....
(ii) at a DTO, at an ATO or with an instructor, where the rating expired for no more than three years and the rating was a non-high-performance single-engine piston class rating or a TMG class rating.
Enjoy

Last edited by 460; 16th Jul 2020 at 07:41.
460 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2020, 07:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do you have a UK licence?
MrAverage is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2020, 09:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thx guys , appreciate it , I’ve got an EASA licence
Jonnyknoxville is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2020, 07:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, but is it UK issued?
MrAverage is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2020, 08:33
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No , it’s Irish .
Jonnyknoxville is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2020, 18:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its training as defined by the Head of Training of an ATO and an LPC. Thats it. I do loads of them.
S-Works is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2020, 18:47
  #9 (permalink)  
460
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not quite, S-Works,
It is possible to avoid an ATO entirely.
Please do read FCL.740 (above)
460 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2020, 07:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And it's possible the Irish Authority may or may not have slightly different requirements, which i why I asked #6. Europe is not all joined up! Also, a UK examiner may not be able to carry out the process. I certainly wouldn't do so without written authority from Eire.
MrAverage is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2020, 08:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 460
Not quite, S-Works,
It is possible to avoid an ATO entirely.
Please do read FCL.740 (above)
No, its not. Its an ATO/DTO involvement, unless of course you are playing semantics on the difference between an ATO and DTO? The IAA requires assessment of the candidate, training as required and an LPC. On completion the Course Completion Certificate and test paperwork are submitted and rating reissued. I am the Head of Training of a UK ATO in Spain, its our bread and butter business and I deal with NAAs from all over Europe including the IAA extensively. In fact i have an IAA licence holder in doing exactly this now.....

Originally Posted by MrAverage
And it's possible the Irish Authority may or may not have slightly different requirements, which i why I asked #6. Europe is not all joined up! Also, a UK examiner may not be able to carry out the process. I certainly wouldn't do so without written authority from Eire.
Its the same process and can be done by any EASA Examiner.
S-Works is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2020, 21:26
  #12 (permalink)  
460
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah,
if I were the Head of Training at an ATO, perhaps I'd view ATO/DTO as semantics.
If, however,
I had a DTO nearby, but the nearest ATO was some distance away and/or more expensive, I might take a different view.
460 is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2020, 09:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 460
Ah,
if I were the Head of Training at an ATO, perhaps I'd view ATO/DTO as semantics.
If, however,
I had a DTO nearby, but the nearest ATO was some distance away and/or more expensive, I might take a different view.
ROTFL..... do you think it’s going to make any difference at all whether it’s an ATO or DTO?. Why would an ATO be more expensive?
S-Works is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2020, 07:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Because, at least in the UK, they invariably are.
MrAverage is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2020, 16:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bressuire
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
For those organisations that teach the: CPL, IR and Instructor courses they have had to be an approved organisation (ATO) but under the same roof some operate as a flying club charging PPL prices for those purposes.. For schools/clubs teaching the private licenses, EASA couldn't make up its mind for may years, many clubs got on with things (wise or not) and also became an ATO but continued charging the normal PPL scale of prices.

An ATO doesn't mean expensive anymore than DTO means cheap. Having said that the EASA has sought at every turn to make all flying expensive. They'l get you whatever choice you make, ATO or DTO.
Fl1ingfrog is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2020, 18:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fl1ingfrog
For those organisations that teach the: CPL, IR and Instructor courses they have had to be an approved organisation (ATO) but under the same roof some operate as a flying club charging PPL prices for those purposes.. For schools/clubs teaching the private licenses, EASA couldn't make up its mind for may years, many clubs got on with things (wise or not) and also became an ATO but continued charging the normal PPL scale of prices.

An ATO doesn't mean expensive anymore than DTO means cheap. Having said that the EASA has sought at every turn to make all flying expensive. They'l get you whatever choice you make, ATO or DTO.
yep, exactly my point. We are actually both.
S-Works is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.