Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

To (ADS-) B or not to (ADS-)B, that is the question!

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

To (ADS-) B or not to (ADS-)B, that is the question!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Feb 2019, 17:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
To (ADS-) B or not to (ADS-)B, that is the question!

Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The Cessnas and Arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them?

Some advice, please...

We operate a PA28-180 for LAPL/PPL and IR(R) training and Club flying. We'd like to replace our ageing but still working KT76A with something more up-to-date and ideally future-proof.

Is it worth thinking about ADS-B? My view is that until it's the law that everything flying must be so fitted, it's of limited value. It'll be the one without it fitted that you'll have a close encounter of the 3rd kind with!

I'd love to buy the Trig 'cos it's made in the UK but I find the code change on it really fiddly. Anyone any experiences with other units?

Thanks,

TOO

TheOddOne is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2019, 21:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: TL487591
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the Garmin GTX345 (I actually have the R model, the remotely mounted transponder, controlled via a GTN750).

Beautiful easy-to-use transponder along the same lines as all of the other GTX units. Does both 1090 and 978 In and Out. Receives ADSB traffic and weather in and displays it on both the panel-mounted instruments, as well as by bluetooth on my iPad (running Garmin Pilot).

The high end of the current GA offerings, but a great product.
2Donkeys is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 07:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We have an older 330 in our 181, which also can be controlled from the 750. A Trig in our Aerobat. If I had the money they'd both get 345s in a heartbeat. In and Out is the future and the GTX is far easier to use than the Trig.
MrAverage is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 08:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,372
Received 100 Likes on 42 Posts
Hello TOO

I've got quite a bit of recent experience fitting ADSB capable transponders to light aircraft and in your case would point you to this unit..

https://www.trig-avionics.com/product/stack-transponder/
Not found changing codes fiddly at all.

It is a virtually plug-in replacement for the KT76 and is ADSB out with the correct GPS feed or one of these..

https://www.trig-avionics.com/produc...-gps-receiver/
ETOPS is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 08:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,372
Received 100 Likes on 42 Posts
PS My other transponder is the KTX2 from TQ Avionics - now that's fiddly
ETOPS is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 08:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TrigTT31 slide in replacement for the KT76A, handling is pretty similar, and wiring to a certified IFR GPS, full stop.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 10:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Approximately three times more head down time with the Trig. I know we're only talking extra seconds but................
MrAverage is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 12:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,799
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
I think that the Trig is the easiest to use transponder out there, compared to the other offerings mentioned before. I've used them quite a lot and once you get used to 'twist-enter-twist-enter-etc' it can be done really quickly. The only other solution that might be slightly easier is the KT74 or the GTX345, where you've got the numbered buttons below the screen. The downside of that is that you have to keep looking to see if you've pressed the correct button, whereas, with the Trig, you can increase from 0 to 3 for example by feel. Also, I prefer the rotary selector for the modes, compared to the somewhat fiddly buttons on a GTX345 or the other Garmin options. I find that with a Garmin transponder I'm spending more time (only seconds, but still) looking at the screen to see if I've done it correctly than with a Trig.
Jhieminga is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.