The New UK NPPL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: too near London
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The New UK NPPL
THe NPPL is upon us at the end of the month, but I am having difficulty seeing any benefit in it. I expect the medical and revalidation requirements will be very advantageous to some, but as a method of increasing the number of folk who are going to learn to fly, how can it? I am genuinely at a loss here since most people take in excess of 45 hours to gain a private licence, and the NPPL syllabus doesn't seem that different so presumably the standard required to pass the skill and nav tests will be much the same as it is now? In which case 32 hours won't be enough will it? So where is the saving? Is it me, am I missing something? Or maybe a path from micros to SEP will result in savings? The same licensed field requirements and the same aircraft types and instructors so what's different? Help!!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the moment, the only real advantage does seem to be the medical, and that will apply to relatively few people. However, there is a lot that remains to be decided about the NPPL - I wonder if there is just not yet any advantage over a JAR-FCL PPL(A) for 'most pilots'. Something potentially more responsive than the designed-by-committee JAR-FCL licence can only be a good thing
Edit: as to the 'savings' involved in a '32 hour PPL', I've always thought that they were a bit of a distraction. Flying is an expensive hobby in this country, and you cannot change that with a licence that allows a little less training (if you're the son-of-Biggles type who can actually pass a skills test in 32 hours), a cheaper licence issue and lower medical requirements.
Edit: as to the 'savings' involved in a '32 hour PPL', I've always thought that they were a bit of a distraction. Flying is an expensive hobby in this country, and you cannot change that with a licence that allows a little less training (if you're the son-of-Biggles type who can actually pass a skills test in 32 hours), a cheaper licence issue and lower medical requirements.
Last edited by Evo7; 8th Jul 2002 at 15:37.
I think that the single most useful thing is the ability to cross-credit between the SEP, microlight, SLMG and ultimately glider ratings. This used to be possible, but was unilaterally removed by the CAA when they incorporated JAR-FCL.
But, for new PPLs, it also saves them from having to pay for expensive training in radio-nav, instrument flying, and suchlike frivolities that the majority will never use anyway.
Hardly anybody's going to do the 32hr syllabus in 32 hrs, but a lot will probably do it in 40-45, as opposed to the 60hrs or so that's the current average for a PPL(SEP).
I was chatting the other day to the BMAA's Doctor, who has been negotiating the reduction in medical standards from class 2 to the FCL150 standard used by microlight pilots. He told me that he's actually been receiving hate mail from AME's over the amount of revenue his negotiations have lost them. Now I'm all for people earning a living, but that lost revenue for the AMEs is staying in pilots pockets, or could even be spent on flying instead !
No it's not going to be earthshaking, but I think there's a point.
G
But, for new PPLs, it also saves them from having to pay for expensive training in radio-nav, instrument flying, and suchlike frivolities that the majority will never use anyway.
Hardly anybody's going to do the 32hr syllabus in 32 hrs, but a lot will probably do it in 40-45, as opposed to the 60hrs or so that's the current average for a PPL(SEP).
I was chatting the other day to the BMAA's Doctor, who has been negotiating the reduction in medical standards from class 2 to the FCL150 standard used by microlight pilots. He told me that he's actually been receiving hate mail from AME's over the amount of revenue his negotiations have lost them. Now I'm all for people earning a living, but that lost revenue for the AMEs is staying in pilots pockets, or could even be spent on flying instead !
No it's not going to be earthshaking, but I think there's a point.
G
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: too near London
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm, some good points, though not convinced about how much time will be saved by not doing radio nav - in the good 'ol days we didn't have to do that anyway and folk still took 6o odd hours. It does save 3 hr I/F though.
Talking about AMEs, apparently the country is divided up into areas and the number of AMEs in each is restricted and producing a waiting list. If that isn't a restrictive practice to keep revenues up, I don't know what is...
Talking about AMEs, apparently the country is divided up into areas and the number of AMEs in each is restricted and producing a waiting list. If that isn't a restrictive practice to keep revenues up, I don't know what is...
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the new NPPL will be of great (financial) benefit to many existing PPLs, particularly those with JAA PPLs which have to be renewed (more money) every five years.
The difference between the typical £100 every year for a 50+ pilot to an AME and poss £10 to get your GP to countersign your self-cert medical is significant and AME fees have gone up much more than inflation in the past few years. I'm not expecting them to go down in the future either.
Those who fly PFA aircraft have permit limitations on the aircraft that prevent IMC flight or even night flight so the new licence will suit many PFA group members who don't fly abroard.
Its no good to me because I do fly abroad and have an IR, but I thoroughly support the new NPPL and appreciate the work that so many have put into bringing it about.
The difference between the typical £100 every year for a 50+ pilot to an AME and poss £10 to get your GP to countersign your self-cert medical is significant and AME fees have gone up much more than inflation in the past few years. I'm not expecting them to go down in the future either.
Those who fly PFA aircraft have permit limitations on the aircraft that prevent IMC flight or even night flight so the new licence will suit many PFA group members who don't fly abroard.
Its no good to me because I do fly abroad and have an IR, but I thoroughly support the new NPPL and appreciate the work that so many have put into bringing it about.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The difference between the typical £100 every year for a 50+ pilot to an AME and poss £10 to get your GP to countersign your self-cert medical is significant
However, please don't think that I'm knocking the NPPL - I'm not. I would like to add an IMC (ideally an IR, but cannot afford that) and I'd like to fly in the USA (my father-in-law owns a Bonanza ), but that's the only thing keeping me from the NPPL - and both of those will probably change in the future. There's also the rumour that EASA will hand private flying back to the national authorities, so we may all end up with a NPPL....
Last edited by Evo7; 8th Jul 2002 at 18:25.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evo7 I see that you are from the South Coast, so flight time to a French airfield for you, is probably well under an hour each way.
Personally, I would not be prepared to give up lunch & shopping in LeTouquet.
Personally, I would not be prepared to give up lunch & shopping in LeTouquet.
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Northampton
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nonradio, with regard to your original post, I tend to agree with you. I think that the NPPL's advantages lie in it's ancillary features, rather than in a vast saving in flying training costs, although there will be some saving in that respect, of course.
Incidentally, you say the NPPL is upon us at the end of the month. As I understand it (and no doubt I'll be shot out of the sky if I'm wrong) we can start training for the NPPL now, but the licence can't be applied for until the ANO is amended (at the end of the month).
Regards, GT.
Incidentally, you say the NPPL is upon us at the end of the month. As I understand it (and no doubt I'll be shot out of the sky if I'm wrong) we can start training for the NPPL now, but the licence can't be applied for until the ANO is amended (at the end of the month).
Regards, GT.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVO 7, Please remember we don't all live and fly in the South of England. For our group a trip to France (even Calais) is a full day's flying in a PFA aircraft. Lunch in Scotland is much quicker and cheaper.
You don't need to have a large disposable income to fly a PFA group aircraft in the North of England. Example prices up here are £8 to £28 per hour (airbourne time) with a well run group (there are plenty) and dozens of airfields to land at with no landing fee.
Yes, if you have money to burn you can hire club aircraft, but we don't all have sufficient disposable income to do that.
You don't need to have a large disposable income to fly a PFA group aircraft in the North of England. Example prices up here are £8 to £28 per hour (airbourne time) with a well run group (there are plenty) and dozens of airfields to land at with no landing fee.
Yes, if you have money to burn you can hire club aircraft, but we don't all have sufficient disposable income to do that.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Talking about AMEs, apparently the country is divided up into areas and the number of AMEs in each is restricted and producing a waiting list. If that isn't a restrictive practice to keep revenues up, I don't know what is...
It is expensive, but then you are paying for 10 years training to become a GP, plus the added expertise, training and experience to be an AME. Junior solicitors start to bill at £120 per hour plus, so in a free market context AMEs are good value.
Me, I'd love to become an AME, but I haven't even bothered writing to the CAA, so unlikely is it they would be interested. In any case, it's not all roses. The hard part would be taking someone's licence off them. Not fun. Spare a thought for the AME in those circumstances.
QDM
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, I doubt you'd get your GP to sign a NPPL med cert for £10 if it's anything like an HGV medical, which I've heard it is. Currently, £60 is about standard for an HGV medical.
I may be on wrong on this, but it would have to be an utterly simple form for a GP to charge only £10. GPs are getting more and more militant on private fees, feeling they have been grossly undercharging for years and years. You have been warned.
QDM
I may be on wrong on this, but it would have to be an utterly simple form for a GP to charge only £10. GPs are getting more and more militant on private fees, feeling they have been grossly undercharging for years and years. You have been warned.
QDM
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QDM, You've got to shop around. Yes, my quack quoted something like £60 for my PSV/HGV medical and my AME took the biscuit by wanting to charge me an extra £55 to sign the HGV/PSV medical form at the same time as he was charging me £100 for the CAA (sorrry JAA) medical. I asked a few other drivers and went to a recommended quack who did the PSV/HGV medical for £25. Incidently this is valid for 5 years c.f. 1 year for the JAA medical.
The only way to keep prices in check is to shop around.
added in edit:
By the way, I think it is going to be a much simpler form that the PSV/HGV medical. I haven't seen the form, but from what I have read in the press releases, the medical form is going to be a self-certification. i.e. You fill it in, and your own GP countersigns it. I think this is what the microlighters already do. Perhaps they can give us some idea of how expensive the signature is?
The only way to keep prices in check is to shop around.
added in edit:
By the way, I think it is going to be a much simpler form that the PSV/HGV medical. I haven't seen the form, but from what I have read in the press releases, the medical form is going to be a self-certification. i.e. You fill it in, and your own GP countersigns it. I think this is what the microlighters already do. Perhaps they can give us some idea of how expensive the signature is?
Last edited by QNH 1013; 8th Jul 2002 at 20:45.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QNH
My apologies - my southern bias is fairly obvious. I had thought about mentioning groups in an earlier post, but as far as I can tell down here you need to do a lot of flying for group membership to pay. Several thousand quid in and £50+ a month before per-hour costs doesn't match up with a £60 quid saving on a medical. I'd forgotten that elsewhere might be different - just add a darn sarf disclaimer to what I've written
My apologies - my southern bias is fairly obvious. I had thought about mentioning groups in an earlier post, but as far as I can tell down here you need to do a lot of flying for group membership to pay. Several thousand quid in and £50+ a month before per-hour costs doesn't match up with a £60 quid saving on a medical. I'd forgotten that elsewhere might be different - just add a darn sarf disclaimer to what I've written
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked a few other drivers and went to a recommended quack who did the PSV/HGV medical for £25. Incidently this is valid for 5 years c.f. 1 year for the JAA medical.
Always worth haggling / shopping around to get the best deal.
QDM
(P.S. Tell me who the scab was and who did it cheap and I'll have him drummed out the union )
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: too near London
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm. QNH I think you make some interesting observations but the thrust of your argument seems only to apply to those lucky enough to have been able to afford a licence in the first place; which is what Evo's point was with respect to being able to 'afford' to fly. I am afraid I cannot see the new licence being a spur to new folk learning to fly - it doesn't affect the hourly rate on the aircraft you fly nor the landing fees you pay etc etc .Please don't think I am knocking the new licence, I think it is right that recreational flying should be administered this way and that's a good thing but I do get fed up when people keep saying it's going to be 'easier' (by which I am presuming we mean cheaper) to obtain a flying licence now.. We are effectively importing millions of pounds worth of flying training (mostlyfrom the US) and nobody seems to mind.
3QDM - nice spiel about standards! Are you really saying that you personally would need a month's course to learn how to do an 'aviation' medical? Most humans operate the same way so I imagine an HGV driver is subject to much the same inspection as a PPL or ATPL for that matter. I wonder on the argument about up front costs we could do the same thing for Flying instructors, or helicopter pilots since it takes a bit of dosh to get qualified and would be nice to have one's own patch...
3QDM - nice spiel about standards! Are you really saying that you personally would need a month's course to learn how to do an 'aviation' medical? Most humans operate the same way so I imagine an HGV driver is subject to much the same inspection as a PPL or ATPL for that matter. I wonder on the argument about up front costs we could do the same thing for Flying instructors, or helicopter pilots since it takes a bit of dosh to get qualified and would be nice to have one's own patch...
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm..
Well Ive been told Ive got to teach NPPL.
However, as no syllabus is forthcoming explaining where the 13 hours disappear I cannot do so....
As for those who said 'savings on i/f and radio nav'...obviously dont understand the current JAR syllabus. The old UK PPL was 5 hours i/f...however under JAR it is 'sufficient training to be able to perform a 180deg turn by sole reference to instruments' (my wording not theirs). There is *NO* stipulation of i/f hours required under JAR. I personally teach basic IF in 45mins - and refresh this enough to pass the test.
As for radio Nav? Well once again lets see...1:00..oh yeah and it covers VOR/DME/VDF/ADF/RADAR and oh yes GPS...like guys on the NPPL wont be using that either..
So at the moment we have speculated about dropping 1:45...yet the licence covers 13 hours less....hmmm...
So..as far as I am concerned no NPPL courses until someone defines what on earth us instructors should be teaching....Im still waiting for BOTH the flying clubs I teach at to provide a syllabus...
Ho hum.
FF
Well Ive been told Ive got to teach NPPL.
However, as no syllabus is forthcoming explaining where the 13 hours disappear I cannot do so....
As for those who said 'savings on i/f and radio nav'...obviously dont understand the current JAR syllabus. The old UK PPL was 5 hours i/f...however under JAR it is 'sufficient training to be able to perform a 180deg turn by sole reference to instruments' (my wording not theirs). There is *NO* stipulation of i/f hours required under JAR. I personally teach basic IF in 45mins - and refresh this enough to pass the test.
As for radio Nav? Well once again lets see...1:00..oh yeah and it covers VOR/DME/VDF/ADF/RADAR and oh yes GPS...like guys on the NPPL wont be using that either..
So at the moment we have speculated about dropping 1:45...yet the licence covers 13 hours less....hmmm...
So..as far as I am concerned no NPPL courses until someone defines what on earth us instructors should be teaching....Im still waiting for BOTH the flying clubs I teach at to provide a syllabus...
Ho hum.
FF
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nonradio,
Yes you are quiet correct in that I was just refering to the advantages of the NPPL for (some, many?) existing pilots. This is because this aspect seemed to be being overlooked in discussions of the NPPL, and yet it offers real advantages to some pilots, particularly those flying pfa aircraft where the aircraft restrictions mean that they aren't missing out on much by changing to the NPPL.
I didn't feel well-enough informed to comment on ab-initio training, but surely this is only the first step, with other advantages like an American style single theory exam still in the future. Its early days yet, but I felt sorry that there seemed to be so much grumbling about the NPPL when it seems to be the first official move in the direction of reducing costs that I can recall.
Again, I express my thanks to those who have put so much effort into making this possible.
While not being sufficiently informed to comment on the training hours for the NPPL I can say from experience that many hours of my PPL training were wasted because of poor organisation. I don't think my experience was particularly exceptional.
QNH
Yes you are quiet correct in that I was just refering to the advantages of the NPPL for (some, many?) existing pilots. This is because this aspect seemed to be being overlooked in discussions of the NPPL, and yet it offers real advantages to some pilots, particularly those flying pfa aircraft where the aircraft restrictions mean that they aren't missing out on much by changing to the NPPL.
I didn't feel well-enough informed to comment on ab-initio training, but surely this is only the first step, with other advantages like an American style single theory exam still in the future. Its early days yet, but I felt sorry that there seemed to be so much grumbling about the NPPL when it seems to be the first official move in the direction of reducing costs that I can recall.
Again, I express my thanks to those who have put so much effort into making this possible.
While not being sufficiently informed to comment on the training hours for the NPPL I can say from experience that many hours of my PPL training were wasted because of poor organisation. I don't think my experience was particularly exceptional.
QNH
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3QDM - nice spiel about standards! Are you really saying that you personally would need a month's course to learn how to do an 'aviation' medical?
Well, yes actually. There's a lot of applied physiology involved and you need to understand the rationale behind the licencing standards and how the whole system works. Like everything in life, it looks simple from the outside when all is going swimmingly. When stuff doesn't go swimmingly or simply it needs experience, expertise and training to carry you through. Like flying itself, in fact.
A good bluffer with reasonable common sense could do 80% of my job as a GP, but the other 20% they couldn't and that's what I get paid for. Same with AMEs.
QDM