SEP revalidation advice
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westbury
Age: 40
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SEP revalidation advice
Hi all,
My rating is due to run out in a few months and wouldn't mind a bit of advice.
To give you some background info, I currently live in Finland although I have a UK PPL with SEP rating.
My problem is really financial, I've been quoted £550-£600 for an hours pre training and then a proficiency check. I suppose this is about right but was much more than I was hoping for.
I haven't flown since last May so I imagine I probably do need the hours training, I can prepare myself a bit my using flight simulator at home.
I was wondering about just letting the rating lapse and then picking it up when I'm actually able to afford it. Has anyone done the same thing ?
It's quite difficult to find the information but from what I understand up to 3 years from the date of the rating lapsing I would need some kind of assessment of my skills before doing the proficiency test (which it seems like I need anyway even though it hasn't yet elapsed) and after 3 years I'd have to do the whole skills test again (which isn't great but doable).
Maybe someone knows of a particularly cheap airfield where I could do the re validation ? I'm prepared to go anywhere in the UK really since I need to fly from Finland first anyway.
Thanks in advance !
Paul
My rating is due to run out in a few months and wouldn't mind a bit of advice.
To give you some background info, I currently live in Finland although I have a UK PPL with SEP rating.
My problem is really financial, I've been quoted £550-£600 for an hours pre training and then a proficiency check. I suppose this is about right but was much more than I was hoping for.
I haven't flown since last May so I imagine I probably do need the hours training, I can prepare myself a bit my using flight simulator at home.
I was wondering about just letting the rating lapse and then picking it up when I'm actually able to afford it. Has anyone done the same thing ?
It's quite difficult to find the information but from what I understand up to 3 years from the date of the rating lapsing I would need some kind of assessment of my skills before doing the proficiency test (which it seems like I need anyway even though it hasn't yet elapsed) and after 3 years I'd have to do the whole skills test again (which isn't great but doable).
Maybe someone knows of a particularly cheap airfield where I could do the re validation ? I'm prepared to go anywhere in the UK really since I need to fly from Finland first anyway.
Thanks in advance !
Paul
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm on the left side of the Atlantic, so don't have specific advice about places to fly, or EASA/UK currency regulations, however:
From a flying safety point of view, an hour is not enough for recurrency training after more than six months not flying for any pilot. The total of the skills which must be reviewed and demonstrated to a safe standard would take more than an hour, even of the demonstration was to standard the first time around, which is optimistic.
The realities of the cost to fly are unfortunate, but being a safe pilot is beyond the economics of the exercise, it's having sufficient recent experience that your skills are where they need to be to be safe.
A comparable situation is for those of us who fly floats in Canada, the water is too cold or too hard six months of the year to float fly. So, in the spring, there will be, by necessity, a six month recurrency flight. That is rarely done to completion in less than an hour, and that would be for very experienced pilots, whose "muscle memory" will mostly last over a cold winter.
You don't want to find yourself in a situation where, airborne alone, you'd "pay anything" to have received more training or practice, because somehow, it's all going bad fast now....
I haven't flown since last May so I imagine I probably do need the hours training, I can prepare myself a bit my using flight simulator at home.
The realities of the cost to fly are unfortunate, but being a safe pilot is beyond the economics of the exercise, it's having sufficient recent experience that your skills are where they need to be to be safe.
A comparable situation is for those of us who fly floats in Canada, the water is too cold or too hard six months of the year to float fly. So, in the spring, there will be, by necessity, a six month recurrency flight. That is rarely done to completion in less than an hour, and that would be for very experienced pilots, whose "muscle memory" will mostly last over a cold winter.
You don't want to find yourself in a situation where, airborne alone, you'd "pay anything" to have received more training or practice, because somehow, it's all going bad fast now....
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westbury
Age: 40
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm on the left side of the Atlantic, so don't have specific advice about places to fly, or EASA/UK currency regulations, however:
From a flying safety point of view, an hour is not enough for recurrency training after more than six months not flying for any pilot. The total of the skills which must be reviewed and demonstrated to a safe standard would take more than an hour, even of the demonstration was to standard the first time around, which is optimistic.
The realities of the cost to fly are unfortunate, but being a safe pilot is beyond the economics of the exercise, it's having sufficient recent experience that your skills are where they need to be to be safe.
A comparable situation is for those of us who fly floats in Canada, the water is too cold or too hard six months of the year to float fly. So, in the spring, there will be, by necessity, a six month recurrency flight. That is rarely done to completion in less than an hour, and that would be for very experienced pilots, whose "muscle memory" will mostly last over a cold winter.
You don't want to find yourself in a situation where, airborne alone, you'd "pay anything" to have received more training or practice, because somehow, it's all going bad fast now....
From a flying safety point of view, an hour is not enough for recurrency training after more than six months not flying for any pilot. The total of the skills which must be reviewed and demonstrated to a safe standard would take more than an hour, even of the demonstration was to standard the first time around, which is optimistic.
The realities of the cost to fly are unfortunate, but being a safe pilot is beyond the economics of the exercise, it's having sufficient recent experience that your skills are where they need to be to be safe.
A comparable situation is for those of us who fly floats in Canada, the water is too cold or too hard six months of the year to float fly. So, in the spring, there will be, by necessity, a six month recurrency flight. That is rarely done to completion in less than an hour, and that would be for very experienced pilots, whose "muscle memory" will mostly last over a cold winter.
You don't want to find yourself in a situation where, airborne alone, you'd "pay anything" to have received more training or practice, because somehow, it's all going bad fast now....
Right now I'm thinking I might just be better off letting it lapse until I can afford to fly regularly, which will be safer and cheaper, at least for the ratio of money to hours I'm flying for my own enjoyment rather than being assessed.
Cheers, Paul
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paul, how many hours total is your experience, so how firm were your airmenship skills? Is your "UK PPL" already converted to EASA Part.FCL (in that case the license itself no longer expires and it does not harm to let it sit incurrent)?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westbury
Age: 40
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry yes by UK PPL I actually mean EASA but issued in the UK, Turns out it's not as european as I thought though otherwise I'd be able to do the revalidation proficiency check here in Finland.
My total hours are not very high, around 66. Hard to really say how firm my airmenship skills are/were, I practice a lot on simulator to keep things fresh in my mind but it's obviously not a substitute for real flying.
Are you saying with the EASA licence I don't have a 3 year limit before I need to take the skills test again ? Why doesn't it seem to list anywhere on the CAA site happens after X amount of years?
I know that the licence never expires as such, but of course if I have to re-take the skills test it might as well have.
Thanks,
Paul Standing
It matters not how long you leave it lapsed. (The 3 year thing went away some time ago)
You seek out the head of training at an ATO or an RF who assesses how much refresher training you need, as a minimum, before the LPC. It's now around 8 months since you flew. Unless you're exceptional you would have got rusty at least and may need more than that minimum.
Feel free to PM me if you need further advice.
You seek out the head of training at an ATO or an RF who assesses how much refresher training you need, as a minimum, before the LPC. It's now around 8 months since you flew. Unless you're exceptional you would have got rusty at least and may need more than that minimum.
Feel free to PM me if you need further advice.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westbury
Age: 40
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all for advice. LPC, LST ? I'm guessing the PC is proficiency check and the ST is skills test. But what is the L ?
The more I think about it the more I think my best option for now in my state of poverty is to just let it lapse, and just deal with the inevitable re-training needed when I can actually afford it. I can keep a lot of things fresh just by using simulator.
Cheers,
Paul Standing
The more I think about it the more I think my best option for now in my state of poverty is to just let it lapse, and just deal with the inevitable re-training needed when I can actually afford it. I can keep a lot of things fresh just by using simulator.
Cheers,
Paul Standing
One option might be to convert to an LAPL(A). The recency requirements have a little more wiggle room than SEP rating revalidation/renewal, allowing you to dabble in aviation as & when without involving expensive examiners or even an ATO. Any EASA FI would be allowed to supervise & authorise your flying.
Should you ever want to convert back to a PPL(A) with an SEP I presume you would already meet the requirements of FCL.210.A (a) but you might want to check before burning that particular bridge.
Should you ever want to convert back to a PPL(A) with an SEP I presume you would already meet the requirements of FCL.210.A (a) but you might want to check before burning that particular bridge.
Not Gold plated, only as recommended by my ultra experienced FIE.
It's more than sensible to test a 50 hour PPL, who hasn't flown for 10 years, a little more thoroughly than a 600 hour PPL/IRR/Night who's lapsed by 10 weeks...................
It's more than sensible to test a 50 hour PPL, who hasn't flown for 10 years, a little more thoroughly than a 600 hour PPL/IRR/Night who's lapsed by 10 weeks...................
I had a similar dilemma a few years ago when I found that I wasn't flyting enough to enjoy it. I have up for a while. After an eight year gap I revalidated recently. I had about 140 hours on a few types.
The requirement is to pass a skill test. The examiner has some discretion about how much they make you do and is likely to test more if you're less experienced or have lapsed longer.
I did an hour each of circuits, cross country and gh/emergencies on a Saturday.
The skill test was reasonably comprehensive on the Sunday but I passed without a problem.
I did spend a few evenings reading beforehand so I knew checks, speeds etc thoroughly before I started. I found that handling the aeroplane, landing on the numbers etc came back in the first hour but it took a two more hours to do a nice pfl and get back on top of nav.
In honesty it took another few solo flights doing circuits, gh amd short nav legs to be properly happy with myself.
I think the message is that returning to flying after a gap is not too daunting, but you will need enough refresher training and passing the test might not be all you need to do to regain proper currency.
The requirement is to pass a skill test. The examiner has some discretion about how much they make you do and is likely to test more if you're less experienced or have lapsed longer.
I did an hour each of circuits, cross country and gh/emergencies on a Saturday.
The skill test was reasonably comprehensive on the Sunday but I passed without a problem.
I did spend a few evenings reading beforehand so I knew checks, speeds etc thoroughly before I started. I found that handling the aeroplane, landing on the numbers etc came back in the first hour but it took a two more hours to do a nice pfl and get back on top of nav.
In honesty it took another few solo flights doing circuits, gh amd short nav legs to be properly happy with myself.
I think the message is that returning to flying after a gap is not too daunting, but you will need enough refresher training and passing the test might not be all you need to do to regain proper currency.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's more than sensible to test a 50 hour PPL, who hasn't flown for 10 years, a little more thoroughly than a 600 hour PPL/IRR/Night who's lapsed by 10 weeks...................
If you are conducting an LPC then you should conduct it exactly as per the CAA guidelines. If you choose to improvise you are running the risk of a Reg 6 appeal at some stage. I prefer just to follow the guidelines as laid down in the examiners hand book. I am only an FE/CRE/TRE so probably don't know as much as your uber experienced FIE but I do know the test standards.....
Except for including 3A and only completing one nav leg (which is what I've always done), I can find no stated difference between LST/LPC in the handbook. The 1157 has mandatory items and others that can surely only be at the discretion of the examiner otherwise why put them on the form? Thanks for the discussion b, I'll raise the point at my seminar as well as my assessment, both of which are due soon. Maybe best to PM the answers I get.
Hi Paul. Its not actually a"Skills Test" that you have to pass, as if it was the flying test for initial issue of a PPL. After the necessary retraining assessed by the ATO, you will just need a "Proficiency" check by an authorised examiner. This will be to the requirements of that examiner, but not quite as all encompasing as the skills test. Hope that helps.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are several "UK briefed" EASA examiners in Finland who can do this. They are familiar with the process along with required forms etc. (it's not hard to figure out by yourself). I just did a SET rating Skill Test with one in Finland this past summer, submitted the paperwork to the UK CAA and paid the fee (133£), simple as that.
How much SEP flight time you have within 12 months?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westbury
Age: 40
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You certaintly don't need to. Any EASA examiner can do your revalidation, it is just that non-UK Examiner can't endorse the Ratings page but you need to submit paperwork to UK CAA and pay the fee (88£ if I am not mistaken).
There are several "UK briefed" EASA examiners in Finland who can do this. They are familiar with the process along with required forms etc. (it's not hard to figure out by yourself). I just did a SET rating Skill Test with one in Finland this past summer, submitted the paperwork to the UK CAA and paid the fee (133£), simple as that.
How much SEP flight time you have within 12 months?
There are several "UK briefed" EASA examiners in Finland who can do this. They are familiar with the process along with required forms etc. (it's not hard to figure out by yourself). I just did a SET rating Skill Test with one in Finland this past summer, submitted the paperwork to the UK CAA and paid the fee (133£), simple as that.
How much SEP flight time you have within 12 months?
So the revalidating by experience is out of the question for me since I'd need to fly 9 hours which I believe one hour of which needs to be a training flight. I can imagine that would cost over £1500, completely out of the question for me.
That's interesting though that I should be able to revalidate here, I thought I read something about instructors having to be pre-aproved by the CAA ? Could be old info though. Are you aware if I need to check with the CAA before any proficiency flight or anything ?
I may well look to do it here in Finland in the future as it sounds easier than i'd feared.
Thanks also to everyone else for the other answers.
Paul