Constant Speed Propeller
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: localhost
Constant Speed Propeller
Hi,
I've been told that in order for me to fly a wobbly prop plane (TB-10) I need a constant speed prop rating. As far as I can see, the plane isn't counted as "complex" because the gear is fixed.
What do I need to add to my UK PPL in order to fly the aircraft and how might one go about getting said rating?
Thanks
I've been told that in order for me to fly a wobbly prop plane (TB-10) I need a constant speed prop rating. As far as I can see, the plane isn't counted as "complex" because the gear is fixed.
What do I need to add to my UK PPL in order to fly the aircraft and how might one go about getting said rating?
Thanks
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: The World
If memory serves me well, EASA tends to use the non specific term "instructor" in the regulations, so I guess FI is fine, or anybody who is allowed to stamp and sign. I am not current on knowledge regarding Competent Person, does the EASA even know such?
And another one: if somebody wants to take a ride in a brand new Cessna Skyhawk JT-A under EASA license, does this means the need for EFIS, VP and SLPC endorsements, as it is a G1000 equipped Diesel aircraft with Single Lever control? How do you keep your endorsements records handy, (electronic?) copies of the respective flight log book entries?
And another one: if somebody wants to take a ride in a brand new Cessna Skyhawk JT-A under EASA license, does this means the need for EFIS, VP and SLPC endorsements, as it is a G1000 equipped Diesel aircraft with Single Lever control? How do you keep your endorsements records handy, (electronic?) copies of the respective flight log book entries?
Last edited by ChickenHouse; 1st January 2017 at 13:41.
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: London
In my logbook there are pages specifically for such endorsements, with space for it to be signed off.
These are called differences training, and to the best of my knowledge these can be signed off by either a CRI, or FI.
There is a full list of differences training available on the CAA website if one wants to check!
These are signed off in the logbook after following "appropriate" training.
Hope this helps!
These are called differences training, and to the best of my knowledge these can be signed off by either a CRI, or FI.
There is a full list of differences training available on the CAA website if one wants to check!
These are signed off in the logbook after following "appropriate" training.
Hope this helps!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
And another one: if somebody wants to take a ride in a brand new Cessna Skyhawk JT-A under EASA license, does this means the need for EFIS, VP and SLPC endorsements, as it is a G1000 equipped Diesel aircraft with Single Lever control?
At my club most of the ab-initio training now takes place at SLPC aircraft (Robin Ecoflyers). We need transition training if a pilot wants to convert to an aircraft with a fixed pitch propellor + manual mixture + manual carb heat.
Joined: Sep 2009
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 948
Likes: 62
From: N.YORKSHIRE
You do not need a rating, but a simple instruction and signed off endorsement "VP", Variable Pitch Propeller, in your flight log.
Would the VP endorsement automatically include 'Constant speed'?
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 605
Likes: 10
From: UK
A suitable (i.e. one who has the differences qualification themselves) Class Rating Instructor can do the differences training. It's worth noting that you don't have to have this done within a formal training organisation, you just need the instructor and access to a suitable aircraft.
For EASA, the "Acceptable Means of Compliance" & Guidance Material) at FCL.700 says that differences for a SEP rating are:
Variable pitch propellers;
Retractable undercarriage;
Turbo or super charged engines;
Cabin pressurisation;
Tailwheel;
EFIS;
SLPC.
For EASA, the "Acceptable Means of Compliance" & Guidance Material) at FCL.700 says that differences for a SEP rating are:
Variable pitch propellers;
Retractable undercarriage;
Turbo or super charged engines;
Cabin pressurisation;
Tailwheel;
EFIS;
SLPC.
Joined: Jan 2008
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 649
Likes: 39
From: Canada
Never used a VP, does it have a governor?
An important element of differences training for any not FP prop is the fact that loss of pitch control or governing is possible, and what action the pilot must take. In my opinion, differences training should also be required for reversing propellers, but they have not made the list yet. There are many things which should be understood with those, and their differing methods of operation.
From BossEyed's EASA list, I had an amusing discussion with the staff of the Norwegian CAA on this topic, as I was flying an EFIS single piston amphibian in Norway. At the time, it was Canadian registered, so within my privileges. When we discussed training (differences training) for the Norwegian pilots of this aircraft, the CAA pointed out that having the required signoff for EFIS on a SEP landplane would not carry over to the seaplane, and according to EASA, the differences training would have to be done again in the seaplane. Even before I told them my opinion of the silliness of this, they conceded it sounded odd, but that was the way the rules are written!
It's always a great idea to get training on a system new to you...
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 188
From: 11 GROUP
Complex Props
Some time ago our local pleasure flying operation used a FR172 (Reims Rocket) and needed an extra driver for the summer months.
Enter an ex RAF BA retired candidate with a 172 on his licence.
Having completed 'his 'check' he was then informed by the CAA that he could not operate the machine as he did not have VP props on his licence !!!
They would not accept a 'phone call test' so off to Redhill he had to go for an exam.
Slightly puzzled by having this guy attending for a rather simple test the CAA man inquired whether he had ever used VP props in the service.
Does 1400+ hours on Shackletons count our man responded. !!!
He was on the Rocket the next day.
Enter an ex RAF BA retired candidate with a 172 on his licence.
Having completed 'his 'check' he was then informed by the CAA that he could not operate the machine as he did not have VP props on his licence !!!
They would not accept a 'phone call test' so off to Redhill he had to go for an exam.
Slightly puzzled by having this guy attending for a rather simple test the CAA man inquired whether he had ever used VP props in the service.
Does 1400+ hours on Shackletons count our man responded. !!!
He was on the Rocket the next day.
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: USA
There were (though in 40 years I have never seen one) hydraulic variable pitch props, which were not governed. There are now electric VP props, for which the pilot must manage RPM.
Electrically actuated props commonly have constant speed controllers. Curtiss and Beech both mass produced them a very long time ago. MT electric props and various microlight experimental props are current examples.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 188
From: 11 GROUP
Endorsement
C-House]
In this case the guy had a 172 on his commercial,but the Rocket had an IO-360 injected engine with a VP prop.
He must have come off jets at BA so his licence never contained a type with a VP prop.
The fact that he had captained a machine with 4 contra rotating cs and fully feathering props did not impress the CAA that he had the required experience to use a simple VP prop on a Cessna.
In this case the guy had a 172 on his commercial,but the Rocket had an IO-360 injected engine with a VP prop.
He must have come off jets at BA so his licence never contained a type with a VP prop.
The fact that he had captained a machine with 4 contra rotating cs and fully feathering props did not impress the CAA that he had the required experience to use a simple VP prop on a Cessna.
