Question on CSP when engine quits
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question on CSP when engine quits
Does the windmilling effect at best glide speed during engine failure with a CSP (on a single engine airplane) provide enough RPM (with throttle full open) to create the oil pressure needed by the governor to move the prop to full course? Anyone actually been in this situation and were the results of shifting to course noticeable in enhancing the glide?
Edit to add: And if so, does this apply from both the engine failing in the cruise configuration with the RPM provided by windmilling being enough to maintain the course pitch and also in takeoff allowing to move from fine to course?
Edit to add: And if so, does this apply from both the engine failing in the cruise configuration with the RPM provided by windmilling being enough to maintain the course pitch and also in takeoff allowing to move from fine to course?
Last edited by piperboy84; 12th Dec 2016 at 05:03.
Moderator
In years long passed, I flew various jump ships, generally an old C182A. SOP on descent was to pull full coarse and then use the prop control as an drag modifier during the descent. Worked a treat and makes a BIG difference to gradient.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your engine has stopped for a reason other than oil pressure failure/internal mechanical failure, you should expect that a windmilling engine will provide enough oil pressure to move the pitch to coarse, if it is that type of propeller. Note that if the engine is allowed to windmill to a stop, you may no longer be able to select coarse or feather pitch, due to fine pitch blade latches.
Selecting coarse pitch will have favourable affect on gliding. For one of my planes, this is vital, as the power off (engine running or not) fine pitch glide is very steep, and selecting full coarse completely changes the glide characteristics to be entirely fine.
Note that in the case of a failed engine which is windmilling, throttle position will not affect how the engine operates if it is not creating any power.
Selecting coarse pitch will have favourable affect on gliding. For one of my planes, this is vital, as the power off (engine running or not) fine pitch glide is very steep, and selecting full coarse completely changes the glide characteristics to be entirely fine.
Note that in the case of a failed engine which is windmilling, throttle position will not affect how the engine operates if it is not creating any power.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Note that in the case of a failed engine which is windmilling, throttle position will not affect how the engine operates if it is not creating any power.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 429 Likes
on
226 Posts
I thought throttle being fully open would create less of a vacuum in the intake manifold allowing the engine to turn easier and hopefully giving sufficient RPM to work the governor?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
I thought throttle being fully open would create less of a vacuum in the intake manifold allowing the engine to turn easier and hopefully giving sufficient RPM to work the governor?
But with the throttle fully open the pistons have to compress a full charge of air on every compression stroke.
I thought throttle being fully open would create less of a vacuum in the intake manifold allowing the engine to turn easier and hopefully giving sufficient RPM to work the governor?
But with the throttle fully open the pistons have to compress a full charge of air on every compression stroke.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does the windmilling effect at best glide speed during engine failure with a CSP (on a single engine airplane) provide enough RPM (with throttle full open) to create the oil pressure needed by the governor to move the prop to full course?
I understand that in the case of a full feathering prop (so not usually fitted to a single), the feed to the governor from the oil tank must be lower than the feed to the engine pump to provide an oil reserve for feathering in case of a leak. That would further suggest that a windmilling prop and governor pressure alone are sufficient.
But with the throttle fully open the pistons have to compress a full charge of air on every compression stroke.
Last edited by oggers; 12th Dec 2016 at 16:05.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ShyTorque you are correct about the compression but think of it as a spring once over TDC the gas pressure pushes the piston down and on the intake stroke it does not pull a vacuum so less drag. On old carbed cars if flooded the technique was to gently floor the accelerator and spin the engine to the rich mixture out, it always turns faster take your foot of and it slows down. This works on aero engines as well.
pB84,suggest you go up to about 4000 ft,overhead an airfield/strip ,and shut down the engine;then try pulling back to coarse whilst opening /closing the throttle,and noting the differences in ROD in each case....repeat as necessary,and let us know the results.........
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cambridge
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best advice is to read the POH for the particular aeroplane and nail the correct speed. If you are really high there is a good chance of reaching the nearest airfield, but if not the priority must be to select a decent field and landing in it - having gone through the re start drills. Charles Church died because he tried to nurse a failing engine home. He crashed in a small one having flown past some really good ones.
I've only had one proper failure and that was in a twin ( a Dove ), and it's true what they say: "it takes a little longer to get to the scene of the crash in a twin"! I just made it into Dauville in a gradual descent ft from 5,000ft with the good engine on max continuous, which made it start to fail!
I've only had one proper failure and that was in a twin ( a Dove ), and it's true what they say: "it takes a little longer to get to the scene of the crash in a twin"! I just made it into Dauville in a gradual descent ft from 5,000ft with the good engine on max continuous, which made it start to fail!
Last edited by terry holloway; 13th Dec 2016 at 22:13. Reason: Typing erro!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
read the POH for the particular aeroplane and nail the correct speed.
However, another speed which you should consider will be the faster speed, probably not stated in the POH, from which you can execute a nice flare, and have a little reserve of energy in case you misjudged. The alternative may be a crunch, if you use your little energy reserve (stored only as airspeed) in an imprecise flare.
A place to look in the POH will be the speed stated for climb after a normal takeoff (not Vx). That speed (faster than Vx, and maybe best glide speed) will be the speed which has been demonstrated will allow you to make a gliding landing straight ahead following an engine failure (another design requirement).
If you're keen, practice a full power off landing from circuit altitude at the "best glide speed". It can be done, but you're flare best be very well timed! Too early, and you'll crunch, as the aircraft, though pitched up, will not have arrested the descent. Too late, and crunch, because you did not arrest the descent.
I did this testing in a Cessna Grand Caravan, and it was very scary, the runway sure comes at you fast! However, to support the original theme, selecting coarse pitch, and further feathering the prop (which can be done with the engine running in the Caravan) made a terrific difference in the glide, and the POH so directs for that type.
All of this is definitely a practiced skill, just remember the factors associated with shock cooling an engine, if you're going to glide.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The POH does list a speed for best glide however that was based on the stock prop a 76" Hartzell, I got a FAA field approval to install a 198cm 3 blade MT prop (that is 20 lbs lighter), the effect on approach when moved to full fine for landing is like throwing a chute out the back. The reason for the original question is I'm trying to get some off my glide capability back if I have an engine failure as this new props air braking effect is significant.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cambridge
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would advocate the POH best glide speed. That provides time and distance. Im not familiar with the Caravan, but in the C182 it's 75 Kts flapless and 70 with them down. Both speeds in that aircraft are more than adequate for a proper flare with the engine out.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got a FAA field approval to install a 198cm 3 blade MT prop (that is 20 lbs lighter), the effect on approach when moved to full fine for landing is like throwing a chute out the back
In the mean time, if you have had an engine failure, do the following: Best glide speed*, prop selected to full coarse, select your forced landing place (closer being better), cause check (altitude permitting), and if you cannot get the engine running again at that time, mixture to ICO, and mags off then. Doing so forces you to follow through on a decent forced landing, rather than the engine spurting back to life, and luring you into passing up a decent forced landing opportunity for a worse/rushed one later and lower altitude, when it quits a second time.
I would advocate the POH best glide speed. That provides time and distance.
I train this a lot when I'm doing advanced type training, and I regularly see really poor skills in terms of simply putting the plane back on the ground with a reserve of safety - pilots regularly overestimate their glide ability. Ultimately, if you're going to get it wrong as you cross the fence, you would much rather be too fast than too slow, and go off the far end at a few knots, than not cross the fence, and slam into whatever it is at flying speed!
This is extra important in drag changed planes, like floatplanes, skiplanes and float amphibians.
This should be practiced a lot. Every pilot I train and practice with seems to have an eye opener when we do this, so I'm thinking that other pilots could benefit from more practice too. That practice has most value only if it includes a touchdown - go arounds at 50 feet really don't show you that you could have landed and stopped.
Piperboy, I have installed an MT reversing propeller on my flying boat, and found the same characteristics you describe - a forced landing in fine pitch would be very challenging. I found similar, though less dramatic characteristics when I tested the MT reversing prop on the 182 amphibian. I have also flown the MT props during testing on 182, Lake Amphibians, Twin Comanche, and DA-42-L360. I really like them, but they're different, and sometime these differences are not well understood. Talk to Martin.
If you're keen, practice a full power off landing from circuit altitude at the "best glide speed". It can be done, but you're flare best be very well timed! Too early, and you'll crunch, as the aircraft, though pitched up, will not have arrested the descent. Too late, and crunch, because you did not arrest the descent.
Of course this is type dependent so maybe the Caravan is especially bad in this regard.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few years back, undergoing a checkride in the Supercub with an instructor of renown, he presented me with not a dead engine, but a sick one, at 3,000' over Banbury... 7 nautical miles to our home airfield at Shenington (formerly Edgehill).
I figured I had enough height to get back to the airfield even with a sick engine,
but just to be sure, decided NOT to attempt any sort of circuit (or pattern) and as the wind was not strong, about 8 knots, set up a downwind landing which worked nicely. Plenty of height for a straight in approach.
Surprised the instructor, he had expected me to attempt a circuit and run out of height.
Of course a sick engine is more likely to tempt one into a poor decision. A dead engine can present you with no choice at all.
I figured I had enough height to get back to the airfield even with a sick engine,
but just to be sure, decided NOT to attempt any sort of circuit (or pattern) and as the wind was not strong, about 8 knots, set up a downwind landing which worked nicely. Plenty of height for a straight in approach.
Surprised the instructor, he had expected me to attempt a circuit and run out of height.
Of course a sick engine is more likely to tempt one into a poor decision. A dead engine can present you with no choice at all.
Extra Speed can be your Friend
If whatever you are flying has lots of drag available, such as fine pitch, big flaps or good spoilers as in newer gliders, you can point your nose at your chosen landing spot and allow the airspeed to come up - most preferably on an approach slope steeper than best glide speed will give you.
With windshear you have some airspeed you can give up, or decrease drag.
On round out, the drag will reduce airspeed quickly; so don't round out too high
This will get you over the near fence. As before noted it won't hurt as much to get intimate with the far fence.
Of course when the landing surface is water, minimum sink will be the best splash down speed.
With windshear you have some airspeed you can give up, or decrease drag.
On round out, the drag will reduce airspeed quickly; so don't round out too high
This will get you over the near fence. As before noted it won't hurt as much to get intimate with the far fence.
Of course when the landing surface is water, minimum sink will be the best splash down speed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have an idea at what MAP when reducing Power that the prop will go "off the governor" (underspeed) and move to fine pitch on your average 235hp c182 or Cherokee6 on approach? I know I'm asking a lot of wired questions, just trying to get the concept clear in my wee heed.