Question about Skyhawk antennas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question about Skyhawk antennas
My CFI told me something the other day that just doesn't make sense to me...
Please clarify if you know the answer to this one.
Skyhawks have two radios and two VOR's. Why are there two communications antennas but only one VOR antenna?
Here is what I was told:
One communication antenna is for transmitting and the other is for receiving. Since we only receive VOR, only one antenna is needed to serve both VORs.
BUT...
The Tomahawk that I used to fly had only one radio and only one communication antenna. Wouldn't that mean that that communication antenna is used for both transmitting and receiving?
Please clarify if you know the answer to this one.
Skyhawks have two radios and two VOR's. Why are there two communications antennas but only one VOR antenna?
Here is what I was told:
One communication antenna is for transmitting and the other is for receiving. Since we only receive VOR, only one antenna is needed to serve both VORs.
BUT...
The Tomahawk that I used to fly had only one radio and only one communication antenna. Wouldn't that mean that that communication antenna is used for both transmitting and receiving?
Last edited by francis.mandrake; 20th May 2016 at 16:08.
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Greater London Area
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The two COM antennas on the Skyhawk are one for each COM and the reason is, both can RX and TX on their own antenna without the danger of one COM sending the TX directly into the RX part of the other. One antenna for RX and the other for TX is simply, a joke ... your CFI got you on that one :-).
One VOR antenna may serve for two NAV by introducing a duplexer to the antenna cable, because it is RX only, so far correct. But, the reason not to fit two VOR antenna is pure laziness. There are quite some Skyhawks with two VOR antenna, mainly the ones first fitted for IFR use on ancient avionics when there were no sufficient duplexer available.
One VOR antenna may serve for two NAV by introducing a duplexer to the antenna cable, because it is RX only, so far correct. But, the reason not to fit two VOR antenna is pure laziness. There are quite some Skyhawks with two VOR antenna, mainly the ones first fitted for IFR use on ancient avionics when there were no sufficient duplexer available.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whopity
That's how almost all light aircraft are rigged, one VOR/ILS antenna that is split at some place under the instrument panel to feed two VOR/LOC and GS boxes.
The latest Garmin split the VOR/ILS signal inside the box.
Mathematicly an antenna and length of coax cable is so reliable that failure is almost unheard of and far less likely than two independent failures inside the boxes.
The latest Garmin split the VOR/ILS signal inside the box.
Mathematicly an antenna and length of coax cable is so reliable that failure is almost unheard of and far less likely than two independent failures inside the boxes.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here ya go ! some further reading from an old thread
http://www.pprune.org/private-flying...-question.html
http://www.pprune.org/private-flying...-question.html
