IMC Theory Question
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why on earth not? Uncontrolled airports can (and sometimes do!) have weather observers.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Olasek,
UK IMC rating holders are limited to 1800m met visibility on takeoff and landing anyway, I appreciate this isn't obvious if you live in a country where they let you have an IR for less than the price of a detached house...
UK IMC rating holders are limited to 1800m met visibility on takeoff and landing anyway, I appreciate this isn't obvious if you live in a country where they let you have an IR for less than the price of a detached house...
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK IMC rating holders are limited to 1800m met visibility on takeoff and landing anyway
But BA pilots are excluded, right?
1800 m is a nautical mile, so you are telling me that a IR holder in UK can't land at airport with visibility 1/2 mile (CAT I) assuming runway has CAT I? The fact that he/she can't takeoff with visibility 1/2 nm is no less shocking.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Olasek & Porterhouse, you are confusing a full ICAO compliant IR (which is a requirement if you want to hold an ATPL, like BA pilots do) with the UK-specific IMC rating. The UK IMC rating gives *limited* privileges to fly in IMC conditions, but does not provide you with the full spectrum of IR privileges. For instance, certain minima are higher (like RVR), and you cannot fly in class A airways with an IMC.
If all you know about is the ICAO compliant IR, then it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to comment in a thread that is about the UK specific IMC rating.
If all you know about is the ICAO compliant IR, then it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to comment in a thread that is about the UK specific IMC rating.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To add confusion for all you foreign johnnys it's now not an IMC rating but an IR(R) rating.... Although it's exactly the same as the IMC rating. As BP says the main differences between the IR(R) and the full fat IR is that the IR(R) foesn't allow flight in class A and the recommended minima are 600' for a non precision approach and 500' for a precision.
Is it any use? Oh yes. If you've never flown in the UK's maritime temperate climate then it's the best thing since sliced bread. Plus mine cost me about £2300 all in cf a full IR which is about 4 trillion quid.
. Although it's exactly the same as the IMC rating. As BP says the main differences between the IR(R) and the full fat IR is that the IR(R) foesn't allow flight in class A and the recommended minima are 600' for a non precision approach and 500' for a precision.Is it any use? Oh yes. If you've never flown in the UK's maritime temperate climate then it's the best thing since sliced bread. Plus mine cost me about £2300 all in cf a full IR which is about 4 trillion quid.
