Church Fenton
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Church Fenton
Daft question time. I have seen the Notam notifying the Church Fenton ATZ is suspended from the 1/1/14. What will be happening to the MATZ, will it be missing from the next VFR chart that is printed.
Yes it's now shut.
There is a thread on Military on this subject heading as Church Fenton.
Based aircraft moved to Linton on Ouse mid December so as far as I am aware there are no aircraft at Fenton now.
Trevor.
There is a thread on Military on this subject heading as Church Fenton.
Based aircraft moved to Linton on Ouse mid December so as far as I am aware there are no aircraft at Fenton now.
Trevor.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose it will I fly from sherburn and the new rule is a standard overhead join at 2000 feet
Unfortunately something as simple as funnelling everyone into and out of the place with set routes doesn't really work all that well when people just tend to fan in from the general direction of Selby and all report the same position/routing.
Are they altering any of the circuit patterns do you know?
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: leeds
Age: 44
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have any suggestions in mind as how to report where you are when inbound/outbound as the procedures that are in use here seem to mimic those of other small airfields.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: York
Age: 68
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about calling up with 5-10 miles to run with "inbound to you from the North, South, East or West" and asking for arrival information?
Then conform to the standard OHJ and Circuit pattern.
Just a suggestion of course.
I flew in today and didn't have any problems with reporting points. Just called my position and asked for Airfield info.
Then conform to the standard OHJ and Circuit pattern.
Just a suggestion of course.
I flew in today and didn't have any problems with reporting points. Just called my position and asked for Airfield info.
the Standard Arrivals have gone and as said the OHJ is now at 2000 . Circuits are going to be changing to keep away from villages if possible or at least alternate R and L. For good measure from magnetic drift or possible just regular waterborne drift 29/11 will become 28/10
Looking forward to the 500' passes over the Fenton runways
Looking forward to the 500' passes over the Fenton runways
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have any suggestions in mind as how to report where you are when inbound/outbound...
My understanding of the echo arrival is to join from bang overhead Selby (presumably now at 2000' QFE) and route directly to the airfield to arrive overhead and descend on the dead side of the circuit. On a few occasions I've heard club aircraft call up on an "echo arrival" as I've approached Selby, and seen them scattered all over the place. One even routing down from the direction of Acaster Malbis. Obviously we don't all want to meet in midair, and you could argue they were seeing and avoiding, but it's slack and comes down to poor airmanship when people are saying they are joining on the echo arrival, and they are in reality 3-6 miles off course. So it would be better, in my opinion, to say you are "2 miles North East of Selby" or "overhead Selby" etc then everyone knows where to look.
Another silly "rule" there is having everyone do an overhead join, when conditions could easily warrant a join onto base or final.
Anyway, I'm not trying to Sherburn bash, just wishing that some people operating from there would try a bit harder to follow their own rules.
Surely no ATZ means no MATZ? Also, why stay up at 500' if you're going to pass the runway? Surely if you're belting down the centreline at 5', you'd still be at least 500' from anything else?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: York
Age: 68
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Joining on base or final just encourages bad airmanship and at a quite busy airfield like Sherburn could be downright dangerous.
At a training airfield, correct circuit procedure is important and aircraft joining willy nilly isn't a great idea.
At a training airfield, correct circuit procedure is important and aircraft joining willy nilly isn't a great idea.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The bit when I said "conditions could easily warrant a join onto base or final" means when the circuit is quiet. I thought I'd made that clear, but obviously not.
For example; One bloke/lady just departing 28 (formerly 29), nobody else around, me coming in from Selby... so I could easily position for a straight in and land. Then I'd be off the runway by the time he called downwind, and if he's staying in the circuit I wouldn't be a factor.
If said bloke/lady is staying in the circuit, then surely me joining into the same circuit (crossing to the live side just as he's downwind in the worst case) could be a lot more dangerous than if I'd just landed while he was climbing out.
To force everyone into the same bit of airspace when it's busy doesn't seem too clever either.
Then you've got some people who turn crosswind early, others fly a NAVEX out to Garforth over about 10 track miles to position downwind, and others may be doing a bad weather circuit. Why add to the melee if you have the nous to just position onto a tight base or short final without affecting anyone else?
I don't think you can determine airmanship from circuit joining alone. Surely the better display of airmanship comes from somebody who can size up the situation they are presented with, and has the mental capacity to make a sensible decision based on that. Eg: No traffic, I'll join straight in.
For example; One bloke/lady just departing 28 (formerly 29), nobody else around, me coming in from Selby... so I could easily position for a straight in and land. Then I'd be off the runway by the time he called downwind, and if he's staying in the circuit I wouldn't be a factor.
If said bloke/lady is staying in the circuit, then surely me joining into the same circuit (crossing to the live side just as he's downwind in the worst case) could be a lot more dangerous than if I'd just landed while he was climbing out.
To force everyone into the same bit of airspace when it's busy doesn't seem too clever either.
Then you've got some people who turn crosswind early, others fly a NAVEX out to Garforth over about 10 track miles to position downwind, and others may be doing a bad weather circuit. Why add to the melee if you have the nous to just position onto a tight base or short final without affecting anyone else?
I don't think you can determine airmanship from circuit joining alone. Surely the better display of airmanship comes from somebody who can size up the situation they are presented with, and has the mental capacity to make a sensible decision based on that. Eg: No traffic, I'll join straight in.
The MATZ was only ever mandatory for military aircraft and advisory for civil aircraft, so just pretend it never existed. The NOTAM closing the ATZ only runs until 3 Mar, and the aerodrome closed NOTAM until 6 Jan, so expect an updated NOTAM by 5 Jan.
Last edited by chevvron; 2nd Jan 2014 at 21:33.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: York
Age: 68
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not wanting to get into a slanging match, but who decides when conditions are favourable?
Sherburn is A/G and an Aircraft en route to Sherburn doesn't know the traffic conditions.
I would be a seriously annoyed if some bleeder called long final if I was late downwind or on base leg.
At a training airfield like Sherburn conforming to the circuit as either published in a flight guide or on the radio has to be better than a pilot deciding his own join.
Sherburn is A/G and an Aircraft en route to Sherburn doesn't know the traffic conditions.
I would be a seriously annoyed if some bleeder called long final if I was late downwind or on base leg.
At a training airfield like Sherburn conforming to the circuit as either published in a flight guide or on the radio has to be better than a pilot deciding his own join.
Never been to Sherburn but it's PPR and it's up to the aerodrome operator to advise how you should join; the A/G operator can only advise of known traffic and runway availability; thereafter it's up to pilots to decide the safest way to join.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Castleford
Age: 40
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can see both points, I like the OHJ for orientation of the airfield and situational awareness, but the mental picture can also be built up from miles away, listening out for people lining up and also joining the circuit, so the idea of the American style 45 degree join does appeal to me, that's the way I join at Breighton and that's the only place I've flown into with live side joins, flying from Sherburn I've seen all sorts of joining techniques, some good and, erm, some bad!
Cheers, Jim
Cheers, Jim
Guest
Posts: n/a
ak7274, there's no place in the cockpit for such feelings.
Flying angry will reduce your concentration at a time you don't need such a distraction.
Also, the a/c which is lowest in the circuit has right of way, so regardless of whatever is said you may have to follow them. And think about non-radio a/c again you might have to separate yourself from them and adjust your flightpath accordingly.
SGC
Flying angry will reduce your concentration at a time you don't need such a distraction.
Also, the a/c which is lowest in the circuit has right of way, so regardless of whatever is said you may have to follow them. And think about non-radio a/c again you might have to separate yourself from them and adjust your flightpath accordingly.
SGC
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: York
Age: 68
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do I sound like I would fly angry?
Sorry if that seems to be the case, but I don't. However I believe if airfield rules dictate a circuit, who am I to change it, or indeed do something contrary to air law in not following airfield procedures?
If thinking that arriving at an airfield in any way I see fit because I think the circuit isn't busy works. I don't want to be there thank you.
Not angry at all. Just don't understand how a straight in or base join is acceptable just because a pilot on his/her way in can think this way.
I am thinking especially about non - radio. How would he hear a final call and how would the guy calling final know he was there?
Asking A/G if there is any known traffic may help when traffic is quiet and I have no issues at all with joining base or final if they answer "No Known Traffic" I know it's not correct, but......
I have heard many "Final" calls having called downwind only to find the "final" was from 6 or 7 miles out and the pilot didn't want to join the circuit because the active runway was directly in front of him. Do you not feel even slightly annoyed when this happens?
I also don't understand why an aircraft which is lowest in the circuit has right of way. If a circuit is posted as 1000ft downwind leg should be at a thousand feet. If an aircraft is behind me by a mile at 700ft and I am at 1000ft almost ready to turn base, should I extend my downwind or leave and rejoin? This is a genuine question and not intended to cause a furore as I have read the relevant section and have seen that the lower A/C does indeed have right of way.
Sorry if that seems to be the case, but I don't. However I believe if airfield rules dictate a circuit, who am I to change it, or indeed do something contrary to air law in not following airfield procedures?
If thinking that arriving at an airfield in any way I see fit because I think the circuit isn't busy works. I don't want to be there thank you.
Not angry at all. Just don't understand how a straight in or base join is acceptable just because a pilot on his/her way in can think this way.
I am thinking especially about non - radio. How would he hear a final call and how would the guy calling final know he was there?
Asking A/G if there is any known traffic may help when traffic is quiet and I have no issues at all with joining base or final if they answer "No Known Traffic" I know it's not correct, but......
I have heard many "Final" calls having called downwind only to find the "final" was from 6 or 7 miles out and the pilot didn't want to join the circuit because the active runway was directly in front of him. Do you not feel even slightly annoyed when this happens?
I also don't understand why an aircraft which is lowest in the circuit has right of way. If a circuit is posted as 1000ft downwind leg should be at a thousand feet. If an aircraft is behind me by a mile at 700ft and I am at 1000ft almost ready to turn base, should I extend my downwind or leave and rejoin? This is a genuine question and not intended to cause a furore as I have read the relevant section and have seen that the lower A/C does indeed have right of way.
Last edited by ak7274; 3rd Jan 2014 at 09:16. Reason: adding a question
2 aircraft on final the lower one shall have right of way is what he means; this doesn't apply to 'long' final though. I would suggest it is meant to refer to 'on final inside 2nm' or some such distance.
When gliding this is an essential rule to remember.
When gliding this is an essential rule to remember.
