Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Flying Harvards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2002, 21:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Age: 40
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Harvards

I wont be flying these for years but I have some questions:
1) Who sits in the front? If you fly solo you are in the front arent you?
2) Does anyone know of anywhere where you can fly them moderately cheaply? I was told theyd be about £200-£500 per hour depending on various things (ie if you know the owner or something) but so far I have only found some place that has it for £500 an hour
3)Are they hard to fly? How long might it take to convert given that I might have 100hours on Tiger Moths?
Tiger_ Moth is offline  
Old 12th May 2002, 21:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Gone.........for good this time.
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger,

In answer to your questions:

1) P.1 sits in the front, and yes it is flown solo from the front seat.
2) Not sure about the going rate these days.
3? If you've got 100hrs on a Tiger Moth, and are a current tailwheel pilot, then you should have no problem converting to the T6, given a good instructor..

Have fun, I certainly did!
Zlin526 is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 03:45
  #3 (permalink)  
www.harvsair.com
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a Harvard for training not far from our place...near Steinbach, Manitoba, Canada for $400/hour Canadian funds.

Adam
http://www.harvsair.com
pittss2b is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 08:10
  #4 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is one down here at Shoreham EGKA It has a website too. I will look for it later or you can do a search on Shoreham airport and i think there is a link to it on there. Good luck flying it.

Warbirds website.

Last edited by BRL; 13th May 2002 at 08:14.
BRL is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 10:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warbird Adventures at Kissimmee, FL has three. $500 per hour. You fly from the front.

I caught my aeros habit there. Little did I know that $250 half hour was the tip of the iceberg...
paulo is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 10:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southern UK
Age: 64
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are in Florida beat a path to these guys at Kissimmee

They are superb value for money , I needed surgery to have the smile removed from my face after a trip with them!


http://www.warbirdadventures.com/


wunper
Wunper is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 10:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are two in the hangar at Goodwood. Never seen either of them flying (although I've seen the Shoreham one come visit ), and I think the CofA has lapsed on at least one.
Evo7 is offline  
Old 13th May 2002, 22:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also had the smile surgically removed after 45 mins (should have been 30) in the Kissimmee T6.

Having time on the Tiger, Stampe, Chipmunk and a ride in the YaK 52 you will find the T6 a 'Chunky Chipmunk'. It's big and beefy, but handles just as sweetly as the Chippy.

Save yourself £300 an hour and get a Chipmunk conversion instead.

Have fun.
Ella is offline  
Old 14th May 2002, 10:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

..... or save not quite so much and get a Yak 52 conversion. Harvard performance (or better) with much sharper handling than even the lovely Chippy.

Not flown a Harvard so I don't know how its handling compares to the '52. But I'd be surprised if it's as good.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 14th May 2002, 13:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: saff 'stralia
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'luck on the Harvard, but if you have 100hrs+ on the Dh82a's then you may need some phsyce help , along with finding the harvard soooo responsive and no major problem in comparison.

F4
"whoops , it's never done that before?"
farrenfour is offline  
Old 14th May 2002, 13:35
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Age: 40
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The idea of flying Harvards was partly to do with getting time on fairly powerful vintage machines which might take part at air shows so that I might be able to fly it in one after a while and eventually move onto other vintage planes because unless you;ve got time on machines like harvards no one would ever think of allowing you to display their aircraft. People who fly spitfires have to learn on other machines like harvards which is what they used in the war before they converted onto type. For example if your company had a share in a spitfire then who would you be looking for as potential pilots for it: someone with 500 hrs on a cessnas or someone with time on Tiger Moths and Harvards?

Its very unlikely that I'd ever get to fly a spitfire but harvards are a good plane to fly to make it more likely and chipmunks and yaks would not benefit you in the same way.

However chipmunks and yaks are very good suggestions. I know chipmunks could be around £130 an hour, I think there's one at Liverpool and another at Booker for about that, but how much is a Yak 52?
Tiger_ Moth is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2003, 21:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the Harvard referred to by Adam is CF-UAT, which is a Harvard IV built in 1952 and currently owned by Mac-Ann Farms Inc., Box 98, Ochre River, Manitoba R0L 1K0.
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2003, 22:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Uist, Outer Hebrides
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oi Tiger Moth, there IS a queue old chap you know!

(Unless of course you're a recently retired RAF FJ pilot with very little time on tailwheel aeroplanes, in which case you can collect £200, pass GO and step into any vintage warbird with a big engine with the minimum of conversion, if you know the right people, wink,wink.)
Prof Denzil Dexter is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 04:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna Wine Country
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
Mr Moth,

I think most of the people who became Spitfire pilots went from Tigers to Spits, usually at about 30 hrs and many joined squadrons after about 10 hours on the Spitfire or Hurricane.

Had two fathers go that route.

Harvards were US planes and I never saw one in UK even after the war.

Talking of the Warbird Museum at Kissimmee, I was there last year. Many great planes in varying states of decrepitude as well as some interesting rebuilds. Visit somewhat spoiled by a guide who insisted that Vampires were famous for tipping over V1 flying bombs. (No I was not a smart Alec who argued in front of his customers but I did send them a polite email when I got home.)
ChrisVJ is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 07:06
  #15 (permalink)  
FNG
Not so N, but still FG
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Thread That Would Not Die, 2....

but, seeing as it's come back, happy new year Tiger Moth and please update us on your commendable efforts to acquire a PPL on a DH 82. I didn't do any Tiger Moth flying at all last year, but might try to get back into it this year. It's not that I particularly like the aircraft, but I find it spiritually improving in a sort of cold shower, 5 am cross country run sort of way.

As for the comment above re WW2 training, I recall various pilot memoirs mentioning spending time on Harvards en route to front line aircraft, albeit later in the war, and sometines in Canada. I think that only the Brits and Canadians called it a Harvard. Didn't the Americans call their versions Texans? The memoirs also reveal that apart from the desperate times in 1940 (when the two dads mentioned above may have made their transitions) the training hours flown by many of the pilots before they got to squadrons were a bit higher than is generally thought. The system seems to have worked to its own peculiar logic in the deployment of what would now be called its human resources.

For example, Pierre Clostermann, a fully qualified pilot when France fell, was made to do lots of training and wait until 1942 before being let lose on the enemy. Last year I flew with a wonderful man who qualified as a pilot very early in the war but didn't get to the sharp end until early in 1944 (he more than made up for the long wait by flying well over 100 Typoon ops thereafter, collecting a DFC on the way).
FNG is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 08:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FNG - you do make me laugh! I'm envisaging The Thread That Would Not Die, 3....

"How many hours on Spitfires (cheaply) before I can fly the Space Shuttle from my mate's farmstrip?"

G - Let's get together this summer and fly (not S&L)!

TigerM - if you are really interested there are a few Harvards/SNJs/Texans in E Anglia but cheaper access would be in RSA. My neighbour has one but it is thirsty, noisy and v fugly. another chap I know also has one but personally I wouldn't go near it. You could of course do a search on G-INFO and write to all owners and see if you can blag some time, it always works for tkf!!

Stik

Last edited by stiknruda; 14th Jan 2003 at 10:46.
stiknruda is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 11:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK Work: London. Home: East Anglia
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TM,
The Yak is a great advanced trainer - there's one available for commercial instruction at Skytrace, at Wolverhampton Spaceport. Another great advanced trainer, somewhat more widely available, is the Pitts S-2, which is about as different from a Tiger Moth as it is possible for another two-seat single-engine biplane to be. It's not far from Cambridge to Sywell where Northants School of Flying has one. Any owner of an under-utilised Spitfire would, I guess, look at someone with mastery of both Pitts and Yak as having at least an element of potential. And a Pitts hour and Yak hour together cost about the same as a single Harvard hour.
Air forces are very choosy about their pilot candidates (even in 1940) and don't mind washing out lots of them. In civilian flying everyone who can be trained to fly safely has the opportunity if they can find the cash and motivation, even if it takes longer with a steadier rate of progress.
But if you've only flown the Tiger don't overlook the benefits of broadening your experience with other types even if they appear less exotic. Learning in stages is a lot easier rather than lump it all together at once - less risk of "swamping". If you go straight from Moth to T-6, you would miss out on the experience of all the shades in between and may find it a lot more intimidating than it need be. You might also miss out on a lot of fun.
Having gone Warrior - Archer - Arrow - Yak in the nosewheel world, and Chipmunk - Super Cub - Pitts - Moth in the taildragger world, each transition has helped the next. I'm _very_ glad that I did some training on the Arrow becoming accustomed to CS prop and retractable gear in a familiar environment before I converted to the Yak. I'm also very glad that I refreshed my tailwheel experience with the Cub before trying the Pitts. And no, I am not yet its master, not by long chalk!
Lowtimer is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 11:56
  #18 (permalink)  
Evo
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air forces are very choosy about their pilot candidates (even in 1940) and don't mind washing out lots of them.
Indeed - my grandfather was rejected twice by the RAF in 1939/40, despite having a pilots licence and a fair few hours thanks to the Oxford UAS. He first applied to be a pilot and then a second time to be a navigator and was rejected on health grounds both times (he then joined the Army who were perfectly happy to have him).
Evo is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2003, 16:11
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Age: 40
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit odd this thread leaping into life again, I'd completely forgotten about it...

I've got about 30 hours now and am at the stage where if the weather was good I could do a short (40-50 nm round) navigation trip on my own, not landing away of course. Not flying much lately, but I did break my 2 months without flying a couple of weeks ago which was lucky - and fun. Also re-assuring as I was just as good as the last time I'd flown.
I'm in a much better position flying wise now than ever before because I'm in a gap year before university so I'm working full time so when the summer comes I'll be able to do loads of flying instead of scraping along like before and not booking enough lessons because if I did get to fly each time ~I couldnt afford it.

About this harvard business: I had thought that nearly all WW2 RAF pilots flew the harvard (or equivalent) after the Tiger Moth, I certainly didnt think they would go straight from Moth to operational type, especially not at 30 hours. It seems like it probably varied a lot, but I read a really good book called First Light by Geoffrey Wellum who learnt ot fly just as WW2 started and then fought in the Battle of Britain. He had about 40 hours on Moths before going onto Harvards to do his advanced training and probably had at least 100 hours before he got near a spitfire. The book gave the impression that the Harvard was the RAFs standard advanced trainer and I swear I've seen this in loads of other places too, but I can't remember where.
ChrisVJ, are you sure that most pilots went right from tigers to spits after only 30 hours because Ive always thought, through reading loads about the period that they'd have closer to 100 hours by the time they got to spit/hurricanes and that they would have had an advanced trainer. Are u sure 30hours then onto spits was the norm?

See where you're coming from lowtimer. The main reason I might fly say a chipmunk or pitts ( which i like the look of by the way, and what are it's rates?) before a harvard is money. Having said that I do see the sense of flying a less advanced type first because it would mean I might get 2 or 3 times the hours I'd have got if it had been an advanced type. But if I were a millionaire I would go straight onto the harvard after the Moth. Then get myself a spitfire! Anyway, didnt esperto do his first solo on a Harvard?
Tiger_ Moth is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2003, 07:25
  #20 (permalink)  
FNG
Not so N, but still FG
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T_M, you first-soloed the Tiger! Well done ! Your achievement is doubly worthy of celebration, first because they are hard b*ggers to land right, and secondly because by determinedly training on one you have kept alive an ancient tradition. Arrange one of your navexes to be Cambridge-Waltham one fine day this spring and I'll take you upside down in my Cap 10 if you're interested.

Stik: is your farm strip long enough for us to buy that tatty old Vulcan that's up for sale? If we haggle they might throw in a couple of nukes. At a mere 1000 man hours of maintenance per flying hour, it's got to be the way forward for recreational flying.
FNG is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.