Fuel selector Both or fullest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel selector Both or fullest
My POH states on take off and landing select "Fullest Tank or Both, I always select Both as it seems safer, is there a chance of engine feed interruption in the unlikely event one of the tanks running dry while set to Both in a gravity feed system? If not why would Fullest be the first choice in the POH as opposed to always using Both for TO and landing which seems like a more logical/safer option? (note: there are 3 inline pumps on the fuel system, 1 engine driven, 1 boost and 1 for vapor lock (there are additional 2 that are not relevant to this issue as they are xfer pumps)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
because you fly something with xfer pumps i feel deeply unqualified to comment....
but i will say some time ago i flew a 172S which for some odd reason wasn't taking fuel from both tanks evenly (it had the G1000 suite so i had visual and audible warnings) it was giving a low fuel indication on left tank but 3/4 full on the other, instead of taking BOTH on the return leg take off i went for FULLEST didn't fancy a cough from the engine climbing out with 4 pax on board...
Just me.. switched back to BOTH and monitored all the way home...
but i will say some time ago i flew a 172S which for some odd reason wasn't taking fuel from both tanks evenly (it had the G1000 suite so i had visual and audible warnings) it was giving a low fuel indication on left tank but 3/4 full on the other, instead of taking BOTH on the return leg take off i went for FULLEST didn't fancy a cough from the engine climbing out with 4 pax on board...
Just me.. switched back to BOTH and monitored all the way home...
instead of taking BOTH on the return leg take off i went for FULLEST didn't fancy a cough from the engine climbing out with 4 pax on board...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel selector Both or fullest
BPF maule mx7 180a with the Peterson and maule Mogas stc which involves adding an electric pump to the supply
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but i will say some time ago i flew a 172S which for some odd reason wasn't taking fuel from both tanks evenly (it had the G1000 suite so i had visual and audible warnings)
I have heard although it might be an old wive's tale but seems to be fairly well accepted amongst the experienced pilots at my club that the fuel vent on a typical Cessna can also when airborne increase the air pressure in the left tank making it feed quicker than the right.
I am prepared to be shot down in flames and retreat gracefully.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am prepared to be shot down in flames and retreat gracefully.
I was always told that the fullest tank would, in the event of fuel pump failure, give a better head of pressure than a lesser full one. I suppose I've just believed that ever since!! How that works in a low wing set-up is beyond me though.
Last edited by Monocock; 19th Jun 2013 at 22:01.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How that works in a low wing set-up is beyond me though.
We have a 152 (the unfeasibly light one...) that throughout flight drips fuel from the fuel vent, still haven't figured that one out either...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In a low wing set-up, the fuel gets "sucked" up by the fuel pump(s). Hence no "both" setting - try to suck up from an empty glass and a full glass simultaneously through a pair of straws, and you will only get air.
In a gravity fed system, there is a positive pressure in the fuel lines. That pressure does not really change that much, it comes mostly from the fuel in the line (a couple of feet above the engine) and not from the fuel in the tanks (a few inches in addition to that).
In general, it helps to put the fuel selector to a single tank
The most likely reason for this would be flying out of balance. Even a single degree of bank, barely noticeable on a murky day if you never look at the balance ball [or triangle in the G1000], can lead to significant fuel imbalance.
One degree of bank will make the outside end of the lower wing tank sit a couple of inches lower than the higher wing tank, and fuel will flow down... although empty on one and 3/4 full would be a bit extreme; 1/4 to 3/4 would not be unheard off for the less sensitive pilots. Especially when they fly uncoordinated steep turns or holds in an air exercise...
In a gravity fed system, there is a positive pressure in the fuel lines. That pressure does not really change that much, it comes mostly from the fuel in the line (a couple of feet above the engine) and not from the fuel in the tanks (a few inches in addition to that).
In general, it helps to put the fuel selector to a single tank
- When refuelling. With it on "BOTH" the tanks are linked, and a small amount of fuel will flow across.
- When parked on anything than level ground. Otherwise the lower wing tank will be VERY full, and if it is the side with the vent [if there is only one] you can lose a lot of fuel overnight
but i will say some time ago i flew a 172S which for some odd reason wasn't taking fuel from both tanks evenly (it had the G1000 suite so i had visual and audible warnings) it was giving a low fuel indication on left tank but 3/4 full on the other, instead of taking BOTH on the return leg take off i went for FULLEST didn't fancy a cough from the engine climbing out with 4 pax on board...
One degree of bank will make the outside end of the lower wing tank sit a couple of inches lower than the higher wing tank, and fuel will flow down... although empty on one and 3/4 full would be a bit extreme; 1/4 to 3/4 would not be unheard off for the less sensitive pilots. Especially when they fly uncoordinated steep turns or holds in an air exercise...
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll second that. When I was learning to fly I remember refuelling after a sortie and putting much more in one tank than the other. When I asked my instructor he simply replied 'Ball. Middle.Not'
I vote both. Takes more mismanagement to run out of fuel.
I used to fly a 140 with no both position, and I used to keep one tank empty for weight reasons. The 140 I fly now has a both position.
Bryan
I used to fly a 140 with no both position, and I used to keep one tank empty for weight reasons. The 140 I fly now has a both position.
Bryan
Some a/c, Rans S6 with two wing tanks have Left, Right & Off tap.
So the choice is easy, fullest tank.
Despite this separation the low wing overflow syndrome is still possible when parked left wing low - as in my shed - and Right selected. Because the pumped fuel return bleed is to the left tank, a surprising amount can drain from the 'top' right tank via the return bleed in a week parked.
I know !
mike hallam
So the choice is easy, fullest tank.
Despite this separation the low wing overflow syndrome is still possible when parked left wing low - as in my shed - and Right selected. Because the pumped fuel return bleed is to the left tank, a surprising amount can drain from the 'top' right tank via the return bleed in a week parked.
I know !
mike hallam
For fuel injected engines it is a different story as you must have a central collector tank in order to have a both setting even in high wing aircraft.
BTW there is a vent line on high wing Cessna's that runs across the top of the cabin from the right tank to the left tank. The left tank is then connected to the vent behind the left wing strut. Placing the fuel selector to left will not stop fuel moving from the right tank to the left tank via the vent line and then overboard out the vent, if the aircraft is parked on a slope with the left wing down.
Not only are you almost certainly flying the aircraft overgross on most flights you are also flying it while it is unserviceable. There is no way it should be continually leaking fuel out the vent while in flight. There is definitely a problem.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For fuel injected engines it is a different story as you must have a central collector tank in order to have a both setting even in high wing aircraft.
Placing the fuel selector to left will not stop fuel moving from the right tank to the left tank via the vent line and then overboard out the vent, if the aircraft is parked on a slope with the left wing down.
All in all a clever and completely foolproof setup. The only mistake you can make is to fly deliberately out of balance, with the fullest tank on the high side, to restore the fuel balance that way. That will just work counterproductive.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In a low wing set-up, the fuel gets "sucked" up by the fuel pump(s). Hence no "both" setting - try to suck up from an empty glass and a full glass simultaneously through a pair of straws, and you will only get air.
Whatever you do, if you change tanks before t/o give the engine time to stop (if it's going to) while you are still on the ground. Chap a couple of years ago who I knew didn't, and died following EFATO.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northampton UK
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Placing the fuel selector to left will not stop fuel moving from the right tank to the left tank via the vent line and then overboard out the vent, if the aircraft is parked on a slope with the left wing down.
a) forgetting to select a single tank on parking (mucho fuel loss)
b) remembering (most of time after (a)), parked on a slope, no fuel loss.
All this aggravated by the FBO's habit of topping the tanks off at night.
But the 172R has a 'both' position. I believe some 172's don't so maybe they're different.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Victorian I agree. Handbook for the C182T suggests selecting right or left to prevent crossfeed when parked and it works.
It always uses more fuel from the left tank when both are selected. All the C172 and C182 I've flown have done that. Maybe it's my flying!
D.O.
It always uses more fuel from the left tank when both are selected. All the C172 and C182 I've flown have done that. Maybe it's my flying!
D.O.
The C172 R and S models have a fuel injected engine unlike all of the older fixed pitch prop C 172. It has a different fuel system with a collector tank under the floor ahead of the right front seat. It also has a separate fuel shut off valve as well as a tank selector
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yet the SA bulldog with an injected engine and low wing, has a both position (and left/right) yet doesn't have a collector tank to my knowledge.
When parking you set it to left to prevent crossfeed and so loosing the fuel out the vent...
Agree with the comment in that if you change your tanks on the ground then wait to see if the engine is going to stop. We startup on left. When warm enough to taxi we change to right, then change to both for power checks. I believe it takes 10 to 15 seconds at full power for fuel to get from a tank to the engine (judging by how long you can keep the plane inverted before the engine stops...).
I think a lot of this comes down to actually knowing your steed and not to take things for granted!
When parking you set it to left to prevent crossfeed and so loosing the fuel out the vent...
Agree with the comment in that if you change your tanks on the ground then wait to see if the engine is going to stop. We startup on left. When warm enough to taxi we change to right, then change to both for power checks. I believe it takes 10 to 15 seconds at full power for fuel to get from a tank to the engine (judging by how long you can keep the plane inverted before the engine stops...).
I think a lot of this comes down to actually knowing your steed and not to take things for granted!