Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Plane crash Caernarfon

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Plane crash Caernarfon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2013 | 14:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: THE NORTH
Plane crash Caernarfon

BBC News - Light aircraft crash at Caernarfon injures two people with a third trapped

Last edited by JUST-local; 19th May 2013 at 14:33.
JUST-local is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
G-ATRR, a PA28 from a Blackpool flying club. Very sad.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 15:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: BFS
Sadly updated to one dead.
silverknapper is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,395
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
The fire service said it had 32 crew members and three officers at scene, along with eight appliances.
Why?

In the last 24 hrs, there have been at least 3 serious road accidents. But you don't see many of those reported in the national media.

The BBC does like its weird aeronautical lexicon of 'planes flipping', 'tail spins' and no doubt 'power dives'. Meaningless garbage churned out by third rate journos.

Nevertheless, very sad news.....

Last edited by BEagle; 19th May 2013 at 16:03.
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 16:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 1
From: uk
The BBC report I read said the aircraft had "fewer than eight seats".

What a strange thing to say.
vulcanised is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 16:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: uk
just noticed the plane is 46 yrs old, is that old?
spooky3 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 17:33
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Swindon, Wiltshire
Originally Posted by spooky3
just noticed the plane is 46 yrs old, is that old?
Not really....
stevelup is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 17:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: uk
ok just thought it sounded rather old for a hire plane
spooky3 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 17:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: England
Very sad, but why do the fire service seem to over react in these situations, if it was in a built up area you could justify 8 appliances.
Echo Romeo is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 18:09
  #10 (permalink)  

Spink Pots
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Up in the air
just noticed the plane is 46 yrs old, is that old?
Not really. I've logged quite a few hours in that aircraft and while the "oldness" shows through in the ergonomic nightmare that is the instrument panel, it really did fly beautifully.

Very sad news indeed.

To those criticising the fire service response, consider that their initial call might have contained no more information than "there has been a plane crash". I'd rather they send half the fleet just in case rather than spend valuable time trying to find out how many seats it has.
Scuzi is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 18:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
tragic for those involved and friends and family, however if this had happened while driving home from the airfield it would hardly be covered by the press.....

I had actually looked at this aircraft on the flybpl.com website before I saw the accident on ASN

I have emailed a few different flying schools for prices to do my NPPL(M) to SSEA conversion today and doing a little research on their fleets. I would not have been happy learning in a 50+ year old aircraft which had already logged 16894 flying hours as of 31/12/2011, I would prefer to fly something a little less ancient and pay more...

I hate when people speculate as to the cause of a crash before any investigation has even begun, I am aware the age of the aircraft may not have been a factor in this accident.
madfrankie is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 19:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Really close to NANTI.
Very sad indeed. Makes you realise 'but for the grace of God'.

Does anyone know what the weather was and what runway they were using ?

I hope it was nothing to do with them bloody big wind turbines.
742-xx is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 19:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter
One dead, two hurt in light aircraft crash

Daily Star: Simply The Best 7 Days A Week :: Latest News :: One dead, two hurt in plane crash
AnotherWannabe is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 19:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Yeah i was thinking about those turbines too.

Very sad. Makes you think...
F4TCT is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 19:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Another one of Robert Mergatroyds aircraft...

He has some bad luck that fella.....
collywolly21 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 20:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire
G-BBBK Accident?

Last edited by F4TCT; 19th May 2013 at 20:29.
F4TCT is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 21:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, UK
Does anyone know what the weather was and what runway they were using ?
I think they were using 26 today but I may be wrong. If they were using 26 then the undershoot is the caravan park and the overshoot is the road/beach.
DavidWoodward is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 21:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: FL260
With regards to the fire service attendance....

When called by the airfield or member of public the initial details will be limited due to the speed we need to dispatch the appliances. Crews get used very quickly at any incident. Add to that aviation fuel, potential close proximity of other risks etc. Its a bit more involved than a RTC or car crash.

Trust me the last thing to be wording about is how many appliances were mobilised!

RIP and thoughts with the injured.
Vone Rotate is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 21:19
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Swindon, Wiltshire
Originally Posted by madfrankie
I would not have been happy learning in a 50+ year old aircraft which had already logged 16894 flying hours as of 31/12/2011, I would prefer to fly something a little less ancient and pay more...
The accident aircraft will have been maintained to the highest possible standard. The age really is meaningless. There have been plenty of accidents in brand new machines!

I hate when people speculate as to the cause of a crash before any investigation has even begun, I am aware the age of the aircraft may not have been a factor in this accident.
I'd be astonished if the age of the aircraft turns out to have had any bearing on this accident.
stevelup is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2013 | 21:45
  #20 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 2
From: Manchester
Looks like runway 26

Looks like runway 26 to me, the signs say that on the pics, I landed there in November and the caravan site, high trees and telegraph poles right at the end of the runway are a surprise, 26 has a displaced threshold due to this. It looks like the plane is sat just inside the airfield boundary on 26, wonder if it caught the trees?
charliejulietwhiskey is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.