Reduce to minimum speed
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reduce to minimum speed
Had this today in a biz jet! Reduce to minimum speed.
Minimum speed is obviously a whisker above stall not a good idea on windy shear type days.
Given you are asked to reduce to minimum speed what does that mean to you ????
Pace
Minimum speed is obviously a whisker above stall not a good idea on windy shear type days.
Given you are asked to reduce to minimum speed what does that mean to you ????
Pace
Last edited by Pace; 30th Mar 2013 at 22:49.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May be wrong but I don't think I have often, if ever, heard the phrase used for GA operations; but certainly very common for airliner approaches.
The most common reply seems to be a rather disgruntled
"There is a limit to how slow we can go you know....."
The most common reply seems to be a rather disgruntled
"There is a limit to how slow we can go you know....."
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of us will have been taught a 'slow safe cruise' speed at some point, perhaps as a bad weather technique, or perhaps a 'loiter speed' or max endurance speed. Doing my IMCR we did non-precision approaches in a PA28 at 75kt/25deg flaps, for example, which was also the bad-weather circuit speed. I guess that's what I'd use if asked. Having said that we are usually the slow ones everyone else is adjusting for not the other way round...
Tim
Tim
Define "whisker"
If by "whisker" you mean "vref" (1.3 vso for a particular configuration) plus any margin for gusts or windshear, that, at least in the approach scenario, is what is being requested.
If what you consider minimum safe speed on the day, for that flight, is significantly different from the norm, it would be good airmanship to advise ATC of that speed.
If by "whisker" you mean "vref" (1.3 vso for a particular configuration) plus any margin for gusts or windshear, that, at least in the approach scenario, is what is being requested.
If what you consider minimum safe speed on the day, for that flight, is significantly different from the norm, it would be good airmanship to advise ATC of that speed.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NO ONE EXPECTS YOU TO PUT YOUR PLANE IN JEOPARDY , you are expected to fly as slowly as practicable for your plane in its particular situation.
advise atc of the speed and attempt to maintain it
and if they want you slower, they will give you delay vectors 9assuming radar contact
min speed for my 737 is 280 knots in rough air (below mach levels).
smooth air is min clean for weight
Vref plus 5 configured on final conditions good
vref plus 20 conditions mediocre
so get with it...and you can even ask ATC one day to see their expected speeds and climb rates for particular planes...they all have to memorize what plane can do what.
stop by center and ask for a tour...terrorism may prevent too much, or go to the nearest FSDO office and ask them.
advise atc of the speed and attempt to maintain it
and if they want you slower, they will give you delay vectors 9assuming radar contact
min speed for my 737 is 280 knots in rough air (below mach levels).
smooth air is min clean for weight
Vref plus 5 configured on final conditions good
vref plus 20 conditions mediocre
so get with it...and you can even ask ATC one day to see their expected speeds and climb rates for particular planes...they all have to memorize what plane can do what.
stop by center and ask for a tour...terrorism may prevent too much, or go to the nearest FSDO office and ask them.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think slow to minimum speed is relevant to light GA especially a faster aircraft catching up a slower one on final.
I wondered what formula PPLs will use and what their minimum speed would be ? Mine yesterday was caused by an obstruction on the runway!
Pace
I wondered what formula PPLs will use and what their minimum speed would be ? Mine yesterday was caused by an obstruction on the runway!
Pace
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"There is a limit to how slow we can go you know....."
Well, there's always one......
The phrase I used a million times was "reduce to minimum safe approach speed". It doesn't require discussion - it's what it says on the tin - and never got any snide remarks in response.
Well, there's always one......
The phrase I used a million times was "reduce to minimum safe approach speed". It doesn't require discussion - it's what it says on the tin - and never got any snide remarks in response.
Funny I would have thought any bizjet driver with a bit of experience would be familiar with the term although, as HD says, it should be 'minimum safe approach speed'. Maybe the controller was undergoing OJT.
Last edited by chevvron; 31st Mar 2013 at 12:22.
ICAO
Obviously, it's minimum safe speed - isn't it?
2 s
An arriving aircraft may be instructed to maintain its “maximum speed”, “minimum clean speed”, “minimum speed”, or a specified speed.
2 s
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny I would have thought any bizjet driver with a bit of experience would be familiar with the term although, as HD says, it should be 'minimum safe approach speed'. Maybe the controller was undergoing ojt.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although, in his original post, Pace didn't given us the context in which the request was made, a later post showed that it related to an aircraft on final approach.
Given that the instruction was given to a biz jet there is a reasonable expectation from controllers that pretty well all turbo prop and jet aircraft will be capable of flying at the generally accepted approach speeds of 240kts below FL100, reducing to 210, then 180 and be expected to maintain 160kts to 4nm final once established and within about 10-12nm. Inside 4nm no speed control can be issued by ATC. Some of the new "mini biz-jets" do have significantly slower approach speeds inside 4nm than other jets including such types as the broad Citation series.
Elsewhere there is a thread running about maintaining separation, and it is the use of speed control during the approach phase which establishes and then maintains the spacing on final approach, whether a distance specified by the tower controller to get best runway utilisation for arriving and departing aircraft or the application of a wake turbulence spacing should this be greater.
Should the spacing be reducing below that which the tower, or indeed radar, controller requires then the phrase identified by Heathrow Director "Reduce to minimum safe approach speed" is a very safe option and in my experience is never queried. Given that a light 757 might have a final approach speed inside 4nm of 125kts (let us know if it is please) perhaps even less and a heavy MD11 could be batting along at 155kts I might ask what the speed might be just to help me decide what happens to the following aircraft, but it is the pilot's call as to the speed flown.
Although Pace did not specifically refer to Cherokees, Chipmunks, Comanches, Cubs and the like, if they are mixing it with pretty much any turbo-prop or jet types the phrase you are most likely to hear is along the lines of "give me your best (fastest safe) speed to short final, what will that be?"
I've just noticed Pace's comment in a later post about a runway obstruction relating to his situation. Perfect example of why "reduce to minimum safe approach speed" might be used. Drag it in fella, we're expecting the obstruction to be cleared it might save a go-around and another 15 minutes in the pattern.
Hope this helps.
Given that the instruction was given to a biz jet there is a reasonable expectation from controllers that pretty well all turbo prop and jet aircraft will be capable of flying at the generally accepted approach speeds of 240kts below FL100, reducing to 210, then 180 and be expected to maintain 160kts to 4nm final once established and within about 10-12nm. Inside 4nm no speed control can be issued by ATC. Some of the new "mini biz-jets" do have significantly slower approach speeds inside 4nm than other jets including such types as the broad Citation series.
Elsewhere there is a thread running about maintaining separation, and it is the use of speed control during the approach phase which establishes and then maintains the spacing on final approach, whether a distance specified by the tower controller to get best runway utilisation for arriving and departing aircraft or the application of a wake turbulence spacing should this be greater.
Should the spacing be reducing below that which the tower, or indeed radar, controller requires then the phrase identified by Heathrow Director "Reduce to minimum safe approach speed" is a very safe option and in my experience is never queried. Given that a light 757 might have a final approach speed inside 4nm of 125kts (let us know if it is please) perhaps even less and a heavy MD11 could be batting along at 155kts I might ask what the speed might be just to help me decide what happens to the following aircraft, but it is the pilot's call as to the speed flown.
Although Pace did not specifically refer to Cherokees, Chipmunks, Comanches, Cubs and the like, if they are mixing it with pretty much any turbo-prop or jet types the phrase you are most likely to hear is along the lines of "give me your best (fastest safe) speed to short final, what will that be?"
I've just noticed Pace's comment in a later post about a runway obstruction relating to his situation. Perfect example of why "reduce to minimum safe approach speed" might be used. Drag it in fella, we're expecting the obstruction to be cleared it might save a go-around and another 15 minutes in the pattern.
Hope this helps.
Last edited by octavian; 31st Mar 2013 at 17:11. Reason: clarification
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny I would have thought any bizjet driver with a bit of experience would be familiar with the term although, as HD says, it should be 'minimum safe approach speed'. Maybe the controller was undergoing OJT.
Maybe in our exact Uk airspace but this was in Lubeck Germany and he just said " reduce to minimum speed "
Yes in this situation there was a blockage of some kind on the runway.
On the ILS you can reduce to Vref for the configuration and weight but I was not thinking of Biz jets but how a PPL will slow up if need be and what they do to gain seperation.
In my piston twin days with an aircraft ahead even S turns helped
As for fastest speeds I remember on numerous trips into Dublin being asked the fastest speed I could maintain on the approach in a Seneca piston twin! To fit in with jet traffic!
Leaving 10 k I could usually pick up the glideslop indications way out and adjusted the descent rate to that so it was a continual descent all the way in and hence a better speed to boot .
Pace
Last edited by Pace; 31st Mar 2013 at 18:57.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Drag it in fella,
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As backpacker says, it depends on circumstances - situational awareness plays a part here, but finally it is the pilot's call. Which is best; a go around, with all the fuel considerations or a slower, but safe, approach and landing. In the end we're all trying for the best outcome for the crew. CRM isn't just a cockpit function.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
how a PPL will slow up if need be