Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Pilot gets 3 years for Coventry Airport helicopter attack

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Pilot gets 3 years for Coventry Airport helicopter attack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2002, 21:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Luton
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Pilot gets 3 years for Coventry Airport helicopter attack

A pilot who flew a helicopter at an air traffic control tower, a month after the Semptember terrorist attacks in the US, has been jailed for three years.
Air traffic controllers at Coventry Airport watched as Shaun Lees flew the Bell Ranger straight towards them before pulling up just yards away, Warwick Crown Court heard.

Jailing Lees, a 41-year-old engineer from Warwickshire, Judge Marten Coates said on Friday it was "practically an act of terrorism".

The judge said Lees' actions had been particularly frightening because they took place on 12 October last year - a month and a day after the 11 September terror attacks in the US.

"There was a feeling in the country at large and in the world at large of what had gone on a month before.

"I have got to pass a custodial sentence on you. I have a public duty to do so.

"Anybody seeing those events would have no choice," he said.

Lees, from Chatsworth Drive, Nuneaton, was jailed for endangering the safe operation of the airport, a charge which he had admitted at a previous hearing.

He had also admitted damaging the airport's glide path monitoring aerial, which helps aircraft land.

Adrian Keeling, prosecuting, told the court Lees was using the helicopter to mount a protest against the airport manager, Peter Jackson.

He had been banned from using Coventry Airport the month before, after his medical certificate expired.

As Lees hovered the helicopter at the airport, landings and take offs were aborted.

Staff in the control tower described Lees making an "incoherent" rant as he hovered before them.

Mr Keeling said: "They honestly thought they faced injury or even death."

Lees eventually landed on the glide path monitor damaging it and was arrested as he ran to a nearby air club.

Graham Cliff, defending, said Lees effectively "snapped" when Mr Jackson allegedly refused to talk to him when he first landed on the apron.

"He should not have done it, but that was the straw that broke the camel's back.

"To say the timing of his protest was bad is an understatement. He realises that, more than anybody else"
LTN man is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2002, 21:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Hopefully he will never get his ticket back when he comes out of jail. There is no place in our skies for braindeads like this.
flickoff is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 01:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flickoff, There but for the grace of God go anyone of us...
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 08:14
  #4 (permalink)  
DB6
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom, speak for yourself old bean. The bloke sounds like a bit of a bamstick to me. There are other ways to make a protest if you don't want to go to jail. I mean, it's not as if no-one was going to see him,is it?
DB6 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 12:41
  #5 (permalink)  
High Flying Bird
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Sarum ish
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the local news, this was about his airport security pass... not his medical certificate?! Doesn't matter which, still not the most sensible way to protest!
I also heard that his licence was 'suspended'... he's not going to get it back is he?
AerBabe is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 12:56
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
Fuller report from the Times:

Helicopter terror pilot is jailed for three years
By Oliver Wright

A PILOT who deliberately flew his helicopter at an air traffic control tower just a month after the September 11 terrorist attacks was jailed yesterday for three years.
Shaun Lees directed his Bell Jet Ranger towards air traffic controllers at Coventry Airport and announced over his radio: “You are going to see the very worst of my flying.”

He then “buzzed” the control tower, at times pulling up just 30ft away and forcing incoming flights to be diverted.

Jailing Lees, a 41-year-old engineer from Nuneaton, Warwickshire, Judge Martin Coates told him that what he had done was “practically an act of terrorism”.

“An aggravating feature of it was that it all took place just a month after those dreadful events in New York,” he said. “I have got to pass a custodial sentence on you. I have a public duty to do so. Anybody seeing those events would have no choice.”

Warwick Crown Court was told that Lees had decided to stage a protest against Peter Jackson, the airport manager, using the helicopter, which he had chartered from another airfield. Adrian Keeling, for the prosecution, said Lees had been banned from Coventry Airport a month earlier after his medical certificate had expired, which meant he was unable to get a security pass.

On the morning of the incident, Lees landed on the runway as two private aircraft, one bound for the United States and the other for Italy, were preparing to take off.

Lees had told the tower that he wanted to refuel, but then said he wanted to talk to Mr Jackson, who walked over and told him to leave or face being escorted off. Lees took off again, but hovered at the intersection of the two runways, forcing an incoming Cessna to pull up short as it landed.

At that point, Mr Keeling said, the airport was effectively shut down. Two aircraft due to land were forced into a holding pattern which meant that the pilot of one plane had to issue a low fuel warning.

As the US-bound aircraft began to taxi on to the runway, Lees turned to face it, hovering about 200 yards away. The pilot saw the manoeuvre as an intimidating gesture and aborted the take-off; his passengers disembarked. Lees told the tower that he wanted to talk to Mr Jackson about their dispute and flew towards the control tower, where Mr Jackson had joined about four air traffic control staff.

Staff described Lees making an “incoherent” rant as he hovered before them; they became alarmed when his tone changed, Mr Keeling said, adding: “They think he said something like, ‘I have had enough’. The nose dipped, the engine sounds were heard to speed up and the helicopter moved straight at the tower.”

When Kevin Lynch, a fellow pilot and friend, was called to try to intervene, Lees told him: “I can see the whites of Mr Jackson’s eyes.” An emergency evacuation was ordered as Lees continued to “buzz” the tower, at times pulling up about the length of the two rotor blades from it. He eventually landed on the glide path monitor, causing damage of about £15,000 and putting it out of action for several weeks.

He was arrested as he ran to a nearby air club. Because of the ordeal, one experienced radar operator had since been unable to return to work, while others had taken long sick-leave absences, Mr Keeling told the court.

Mr Jackson, a commercial pilot with 30 years’ experience, had suffered continuous sleepless nights since the events.

Mr Keeling told the court: “Mr Jackson and his staff in the tower thought the helicopter was about to ram them. They honestly thought they faced injury or even death.”

Lees had previously admitted endangering the safe operation of the airport as well as damaging the airport’s glide path monitoring aerial, which helps aircraft to land, for which he was not given any separate penalty.

Graham Cliff, in mitigation, said the incident had shattered Lees and his family, and he had been unable to work and was receiving treatment for post-traumatic stress. He had spent a considerable amount of money training to be a pilot and was considered by fellow flyers to be highly competent.

The problem over Lees’s medical certificate had in fact been resolved by September 11, and Lees was angry that he was still barred from the airport.
ORAC is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 14:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was sentenced very properly. The underlying problem is more to do wirh psychiatry than flying.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 16:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'From the horse's mouth!'

I am the wife of one of the ATCO's involved in the incident at Coventry Airport. I have never taken much interest in this site, but feel compelled on this occasion to pass comment.

My husband and I have been together for 26 years and aviation, be it flying, controlling, reading about etc. has been his life, man and boy.

The incident on October 12th has not only possibly ruined his career (20 yrs an ATCO) but also but a huge strain on our family life. My husband now finds it difficult to go near an airport terminal or tower, is still suffering from horrendous nightmares and is suffering severe depression, partly due to the prospect that his lifelong career may have been destroyed by this one man's 'moment of madness'.

For the likes of those thinking along the lines of 'Tom the Tenor' I can only say that I hope you are never on the receiving end of such an incident. I have not experienced anything like this before, it is extremely frightening watching your loved one struggling to come to terms with what has happened and the way in which it has affected him.

I don't expect sympathy and violins, but wanted to try to explain from first hand experience, the consequences of Mr Lees actions.
ATCO Spouse is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 17:52
  #9 (permalink)  
High Flying Bird
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Sarum ish
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very very sorry to hear of your husband's, and family's suffering ATCO. I hope that in due time he will be able to return to work, and that life will return to normality. The controllers at CVT, and at all the other airfields, do a great job, and it's a shame that one person can disrupt the lives of so many. Best wishes to your family.
AerBabe is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 18:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I,m verry sorry to here that the actions of this idiot have had such dire effects on one of the coventry controlers who has been such a help to me over the years , I can only wish him a speedy recovery and hope that the idiot has a long and unplesant stay in prison.
A and C is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 20:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if that idiot has enough money to pay for 'joyrides' in a Jet Ranger (maybe he even owns it?) then I sincerely hope that Mr. and Mrs.ATCO sucessfully sue him for every sodding penny he has. Maybe that'll ground him for good.
maxalt is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2002, 20:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom the Tenor, are you a nutter too? I cannot believe anyone could say that unless they were. This **** was totally out of order. There is no mitgating circumstance that could posisbly give any validation to this blokes actions, If you think it was ok for him to do what he did on the basis that "don't shout to loud 'cuz one day you might do it" where do you draw the line. Would it be ok for a concorde pilot to do a mach one beat up of EGLL control tower one sunny bank holdiday because he was a bit pissed of with the management? Of Course not. as pilots we all sign up for the law abiding saftey first thingy. If this man's command of the english languauge was so poor he felt the need to express himself by chucking a helicopter at the ATC staff, he should be in a nut hut not a prison!

Last edited by flickoff; 13th Apr 2002 at 21:34.
flickoff is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 08:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom the Tenor,

Do please reply to the previous poster, because you too might be a dangerous dipstick at this stage as your post stands. Hurry up.
Twistedfirefighter is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 12:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I refuse to be intimidated by the like's of you, Twistedfirefighter. Go bully somewhere else! I am not an apologist for this guy at Coventry. It is that there is a thin line between carrying on sort of rationally and becoming nuts and people succeed and fail at this every day.
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 15:54
  #15 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Wind your necks in......

Back to the point please or this gets booted........... No ifs, no buts... Ok.?
BRL is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 16:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think we have strayed from the point. Tom the Tenor (if I understand him) has raised the possibility that this man Lees was suffering from some sort of mental illness. He (Lees) certainly wasn't very rational that day at Coventry....
CAHLIBAHN_MK2 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 16:33
  #17 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAHLIBAHN_MK2
I am just nipping it in the bud before it gets out of hand. We all know how things like this can go off all over the place. My real point is that we have Mrs Atco explaining in great detail how this has affected her husband. This is her first post and she is probabley checking back to this thread to see what is being said. What i dont want her to see (or anyone else) is the way us so-called 'professionals' going off subject and slugging it out with each other. That will not do on this forum. As i say, just getting a grip to prevent the slagging that goes on occasionally.
BRL is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 16:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There may be a thin line but being on the wrong side of it places you in the 'shouldn't have a licence' category. There is no excuse for this sort of behaviour being acceptable. If you believe that you are likely to be in a similar situation then hand back your licence now, do us all a favour, and accept that you simply shouldn't be flying (assuming you are).

Mental illness, if this was the case here, is very sad but that doesn't mean that we should all rush round and say that this person couldn't help himself, should be given a 'get out of jail free' card, and sent on a course of improving himself through state sponsored helicopter rental. Come on.

I don't go for hanging and flogging but when people pursue this beheviour I am all in favour for sending them to an uninhabited island where they can tilt their rotors at a rock face and endangour only themselves not other aviators, the control tower staff, and the reputation of the private flying community.

Sorry that this thread is being cut short - there are some valid points here.
formationfoto is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 17:42
  #19 (permalink)  
PPruNaholic!
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Buckinghamshire
Age: 61
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi all,

I read the story in the Times yesterday absolutely aghast. What this fella apparently did was absolutely awful. Not only scaring the living daylights out of the people in the TWR but also delaying two outbound and causing diversion of some inbound flights as well.

Whatever caused the guy to become so upset cannot justify what he did, and I feel sure that many who like me are able to enjoy our hobby thanks to the work of ATCOs around the country will join me in expressing sympathy and concern for "ATCO" & "ATCO Spouse" et al.

I'm also sympathetic to the moderator on this occasion... just because someone (apparently in Ireland?) who is perhaps not fully aware of the details shot off a perhaps ill-considered comment and hasn't the grace to back-down, we should be careful not to go overboard with the "flaming" and be satisfied that the matter has been decided in a court of law, and that justice has been decided there where the facts would hopefully have been given a full hearing.
Aussie Andy is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2002, 18:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spanish Riviera
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The priveledge to fly an aircraft is just that; this person has abused that priveledge and, in doing so, upset, worried and assaulted various individuals.
Whipping Boy's SATCO is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.