Crossing Alps and Oxygen - rules?
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can get to FL140 you should be fine on a nice calm day.
Remember that the claimed ceiling will be achieved only in ISA conditions. In Sep/Oct you should be OK but much of this "summer" I have been seeing ISA+10 to ISA+15 and that knocks anything up to 3000ft off the ceiling.
Flying abroad is no problem and your 180hrs is fine. I was doing trips like this with less time. You just have to get your ducks in a row and do the planning and understand aircraft performance; stuff not necessary if going to say Bembridge
That's not a good strategy. For serious flights you need proper navigation which means a decent GPS. ATC will not offer vectors below their minimum vectoring altitude and that is usually a few thousand feet above the general terrain in the Alps. But you need to avoid IMC because of the icing risk; you will not have an escape route via a descent.
Remember that the claimed ceiling will be achieved only in ISA conditions. In Sep/Oct you should be OK but much of this "summer" I have been seeing ISA+10 to ISA+15 and that knocks anything up to 3000ft off the ceiling.
Flying abroad is no problem and your 180hrs is fine. I was doing trips like this with less time. You just have to get your ducks in a row and do the planning and understand aircraft performance; stuff not necessary if going to say Bembridge
So thoughts were, be above MSA, stay there and have a chat to ATC for some vectors.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your notes of the legal position. This reads to me like 12,000ft legal limit without O2 on board, as you say it only says I need a bottle. But this reads to me that if I go above 12,000 I do not need O2 unless I am there for 30 minutes or more, but I need it on board to bust 12,000. Is that a correct interpretation?
Sorry, in Germany when flying VFR above 5000ft amsl or 2000ft above ground it is MANDATORY to maintain a Flight Level according to the semicircular rules (55,75,95,115 from 0 - 179 degrees magnetic track, 65,85,105 etc from 180 degrees to 359 degrees).
Last edited by achimha; 28th Aug 2012 at 10:11.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever i lay my hat, that's my home...
Age: 44
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Peterh337,
I agree now hence "My thoughts were..." not are
Achimha, thanks with FL125 for 30 minutes that at least offers me compliance with semi-circular for the return leg. Even if it's not that adhered to.
That's not a good strategy.
Achimha, thanks with FL125 for 30 minutes that at least offers me compliance with semi-circular for the return leg. Even if it's not that adhered to.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pace, I've taken what you've said on board and will check my O2 performance with altitude.
Pace
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume you wouldnt consider this trip without good GPS. On that basis I am not sure where you think ATC might come in with vectors? Over the Alps unless above the MSA they are not going to give you vectors, and in any event they arent going to see cloud on their radar (as opposed to precipitation). As with any flight above the MSA and IF in CAS you could request x degrees left or right for weather but the request is based on your visual perception of the weather ahead, or, if fitted, the weather information in the cockpit. To be frank at the point at which you start requesting vectors around weather unless you are very comfortable with what you are doing you might well do better with another plan (like turning back) because certainly I find when ever you start requesting vectors around weather there is a very good chance you will end up in IMC for a period of time. Once in IMC over the ALPs what are you going to do, even with ATC's help? You could ask for a climb, but you might not achieve VMC on top before exhausting your aircraft's performance, and you could ask for turns, but neither you or ATC will have much idea whether this is likely to take you out of the weather. Of course, what you cant do is ask for a descent which is often a good get out of trouble solution where the MSA is much lower and/or where you know there is VMC below. If you elected to stay in IMC for however long it took aside for the icing risk which is very real, you cant expect ATC to vector you "out of trouble". As a last resort it could be an option, but you definitely should not have got yourself into that situation in the first place unless you were also "happy" to take responsibility for your own navigation including diversions and for some unexpected reason (like dual GPS failures) things haven't gone well!
With apologies, I am not trying to teach you to suck eggs, or to bang on about IMC, but IMC above the Alps is really not a good idea and should be avoided at almost all cost unless you are very certain about your instrument flying and the aircraft's capability. In short unless you are very certain, the trip should be an assured VMC day and if it doesn't go to plan for any reason the old adage of turning back or diverting is a good one.
With apologies, I am not trying to teach you to suck eggs, or to bang on about IMC, but IMC above the Alps is really not a good idea and should be avoided at almost all cost unless you are very certain about your instrument flying and the aircraft's capability. In short unless you are very certain, the trip should be an assured VMC day and if it doesn't go to plan for any reason the old adage of turning back or diverting is a good one.
Last edited by Fuji Abound; 28th Aug 2012 at 11:48.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can fill yer boots with oximeters here
This one is quite good, but would probably get in the way. Perhaps one could wear it on one's willy?
Might be worth taking the C172 up to Norfolk (CAS base FL200) and see how high it really goes. I wonder what the correct procedure would be to get a non-instrumented engine to the operating ceiling? A cruise climb ought to do it, I suppose, eventually. One cannot use the constant-EGT method without an EGT gauge.
This one is quite good, but would probably get in the way. Perhaps one could wear it on one's willy?
Might be worth taking the C172 up to Norfolk (CAS base FL200) and see how high it really goes. I wonder what the correct procedure would be to get a non-instrumented engine to the operating ceiling? A cruise climb ought to do it, I suppose, eventually. One cannot use the constant-EGT method without an EGT gauge.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever i lay my hat, that's my home...
Age: 44
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norfolk would be a good place, but I'm southern Germany at the moment... lol. A long flight for that. I can get to FL100 as it is all Class E to that level here, except for around the big airports where it is C/D. So I can probably get a good idea of climb performance to that level. I think it is C above that, so could probably ask Lagen Info for higher, they might say bog off... but you never know.
The steed does have 1 EGT gauge, in fact all aircraft I can get my hands on do, I'm not sure but the C182 might have EGT/CHT per cylinder as well; I would need to check.
I normally cruise around 6k to 8k when the leg is longer than an hour. Did Strasbourg a while ago 61 minutes wheels up to wheels down FL065. Worked well to constant EGT up to cruise and then set cruise power Peak EGT. On the way down I nudged it to about 100F ROP and then let it come back to just ROP, before nudging to 100F again. Worked well with a power on decent. Out of a PA28 got 125 to 130 KIAS all the way down to the circuit.
The steed does have 1 EGT gauge, in fact all aircraft I can get my hands on do, I'm not sure but the C182 might have EGT/CHT per cylinder as well; I would need to check.
I normally cruise around 6k to 8k when the leg is longer than an hour. Did Strasbourg a while ago 61 minutes wheels up to wheels down FL065. Worked well to constant EGT up to cruise and then set cruise power Peak EGT. On the way down I nudged it to about 100F ROP and then let it come back to just ROP, before nudging to 100F again. Worked well with a power on decent. Out of a PA28 got 125 to 130 KIAS all the way down to the circuit.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One EGT is better than none!
The problem of course is that you don't know if one (or more) cylinder(s) is (are) running hot and if you are using the EGT to operate at LOP then that substantially increases the danger of causing severe damage.
With a single EGT I think you are better off using the mixture control but back it up by a reasonable degree so the engine is running a little more rich, and by all means monitoring the EGT to establish whether it trends as you would expect.
The problem of course is that you don't know if one (or more) cylinder(s) is (are) running hot and if you are using the EGT to operate at LOP then that substantially increases the danger of causing severe damage.
With a single EGT I think you are better off using the mixture control but back it up by a reasonable degree so the engine is running a little more rich, and by all means monitoring the EGT to establish whether it trends as you would expect.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may well find that if you cross in Swiss airspace, they won't let you go into the Class C whose base is FL130 in places (was last time I looked). So you have to fly fairly close to the terrain. That's what I ended up doing on this trip in 2004.
One EGT gauge is good enough as it allows you to fly the constant-EGT climb profile, where you note the EGT after takeoff, and then gradually lean throughout the climb, keeping that value constant-ish. Some notes here (search for constant-EGT method).
One EGT gauge is good enough as it allows you to fly the constant-EGT climb profile, where you note the EGT after takeoff, and then gradually lean throughout the climb, keeping that value constant-ish. Some notes here (search for constant-EGT method).
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have flown - repeatedly - over several mountain ranges, not only the Alps. Leaving the O2 issue aside, trying to cross ANY mountain range with only 1000ft to spare borders on the insane, especially in an (at that altitude) totally underpowered a/c.
Do *not* assume that because it's nice and calm where you start your trip and the fcst wx is good that it will be like that at altitude and/or remain throughout your trip. Wx in the Alps especially can change at no notice at all and can easily catch you out. Always have a Plan B and enough air between you and the cumulugranitus.
Btw, you say you are in southern Germany. IIRC getting to FL120/150 is not an issue in Austria, if you want to give it a go. Then again, you'll already be half way across the Alps by then
Do *not* assume that because it's nice and calm where you start your trip and the fcst wx is good that it will be like that at altitude and/or remain throughout your trip. Wx in the Alps especially can change at no notice at all and can easily catch you out. Always have a Plan B and enough air between you and the cumulugranitus.
Btw, you say you are in southern Germany. IIRC getting to FL120/150 is not an issue in Austria, if you want to give it a go. Then again, you'll already be half way across the Alps by then
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norfolk would be a good place, but I'm southern Germany at the moment... lol. A long flight for that. I can get to FL100 as it is all Class E to that level here, except for around the big airports where it is C/D. So I can probably get a good idea of climb performance to that level. I think it is C above that, so could probably ask Lagen Info for higher, they might say bog off... but you never know.