Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Quadrantal rule question


Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Quadrantal rule question

Old 16th July 2012 | 14:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: UK
Quadrantal rule question

Hi all,

According to PPL Air Law, the Quadrantal Rule applies upto FL245 and then the Semi-Circular Rule applies above FL245.

But, what if your flying exactly AT FL245.

Say your heading is 310 degrees, then do you still follow Even FL + 500 = FL245?

Thanks in advance

Mark
Mark3618 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 15:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
If you're at FL245 you do whatever ATC tells you to do.

Seriously, at that altitude you are most likely flying IFR airways. Each airway has its own altitudes for traffic back and forth, and most follow the semi-circular rule.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 15:07
  #3 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 323
From: east ESSEX
FL245 is not available as a cruising level....
sycamore is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 15:14
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi,

So does this mean the highest available FL for a heading of 310 degrees using Quadrantal, would therefore be FL225?

Mark
Mark3618 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 16:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
....and quadrantal exists only in the UK.
172driver is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 16:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 2
From: UK
According to PPL Air Law, the Quadrantal Rule applies upto FL245 and then the Semi-Circular Rule applies above FL245.
So does this mean the highest available FL for a heading of 310 degrees using Quadrantal, would therefore be FL225?
You're a bit out of date. If you look at CAP393, Rule 34 (11 Jan 2010 revision) shows the division now as FL195. So FL185 is highest usable as a cruising level for 310 degrees.

All airspace above FL195 is class C, hence you do what ATC clears you to do.
bookworm is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 17:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, USA
Another Brit anomaly. Hey, I have this radical idea - why not do it like the rest of the world does it in the interest of safety?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 17:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Its already due to be changed I believe.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 17:41
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
Another Brit anomaly. Hey, I have this radical idea - why not do it like the rest of the world does it in the interest of safety?
You mean like using inches of mercury and US Gallons?
foxmoth is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 18:01
  #10 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 323
From: east ESSEX
Or even Hector`s Pastilles..
sycamore is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 18:09
  #11 (permalink)  
UV
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 665
Likes: 8
From: Essex
or American miles?...need we go on?
UV is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 18:14
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: london
we'll standardise our quadrantal if you standardise your R/T
custardpsc is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2012 | 19:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
We'd love some standard weather too!
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2012 | 08:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: London
To be fair, it's much easier and cheaper to change things like the quadrantal rule and RT phrases than it is to change all the instruments that display in non-SI units. It would seem to make sense to do that in the interest of safety...more sense maybe than insisting on hi-vis jackets at small GA fields
fattony is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.