Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Quadrantal rule question

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Quadrantal rule question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jul 2012, 14:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quadrantal rule question

Hi all,

According to PPL Air Law, the Quadrantal Rule applies upto FL245 and then the Semi-Circular Rule applies above FL245.

But, what if your flying exactly AT FL245.

Say your heading is 310 degrees, then do you still follow Even FL + 500 = FL245?

Thanks in advance

Mark
Mark3618 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 15:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you're at FL245 you do whatever ATC tells you to do.

Seriously, at that altitude you are most likely flying IFR airways. Each airway has its own altitudes for traffic back and forth, and most follow the semi-circular rule.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 15:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
FL245 is not available as a cruising level....
sycamore is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 15:14
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

So does this mean the highest available FL for a heading of 310 degrees using Quadrantal, would therefore be FL225?

Mark
Mark3618 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 16:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....and quadrantal exists only in the UK.
172driver is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 16:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
According to PPL Air Law, the Quadrantal Rule applies upto FL245 and then the Semi-Circular Rule applies above FL245.
So does this mean the highest available FL for a heading of 310 degrees using Quadrantal, would therefore be FL225?
You're a bit out of date. If you look at CAP393, Rule 34 (11 Jan 2010 revision) shows the division now as FL195. So FL185 is highest usable as a cruising level for 310 degrees.

All airspace above FL195 is class C, hence you do what ATC clears you to do.
bookworm is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 17:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Brit anomaly. Hey, I have this radical idea - why not do it like the rest of the world does it in the interest of safety?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 17:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its already due to be changed I believe.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 17:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Brit anomaly. Hey, I have this radical idea - why not do it like the rest of the world does it in the interest of safety?
You mean like using inches of mercury and US Gallons?
foxmoth is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 18:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Or even Hector`s Pastilles..
sycamore is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 18:09
  #11 (permalink)  
UV
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 653
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
or American miles?...need we go on?
UV is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 18:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: london
Age: 60
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we'll standardise our quadrantal if you standardise your R/T
custardpsc is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2012, 19:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We'd love some standard weather too!
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2012, 08:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair, it's much easier and cheaper to change things like the quadrantal rule and RT phrases than it is to change all the instruments that display in non-SI units. It would seem to make sense to do that in the interest of safety...more sense maybe than insisting on hi-vis jackets at small GA fields
fattony is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.