Thread removal.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: dorset
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread removal.
I can no longer find the Indy Hiatt thread and was wondering why it has been removed.
I'd also like to ask, if a thread is removed by the management, should a reason be given?
I'd also like to ask, if a thread is removed by the management, should a reason be given?
JAKL. Brave of you questioning why.
I noticed it vanished, sunk without trace.
BUT Prrune is a private fiefdom and the owners can do what they like.
QED.
mike hallam.
I noticed it vanished, sunk without trace.
BUT Prrune is a private fiefdom and the owners can do what they like.
QED.
mike hallam.
A little less conversation,
a little more aviation...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bracknell, UK
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A little less conversation,
a little more aviation...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bracknell, UK
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had been following that thread with interest and had it in my mind that IF the accusations were untrue pprune could be in deep trouble in the courts.
Some on thes pages jump in with both feet long before all the facts are known and fail to give a balanced opinion, in fact some times pprune is just like a kangaroo court...........looking to give the accused a fair trial by media and then hang them.
No wonder a few threads get pulled.
Some on thes pages jump in with both feet long before all the facts are known and fail to give a balanced opinion, in fact some times pprune is just like a kangaroo court...........looking to give the accused a fair trial by media and then hang them.
No wonder a few threads get pulled.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am so surprised the thread ran for so long....it could have huge legal ramifications for the original poster, subsequent posters and PPRuNe.....how much of the story was actual fact??....well, maybe we will never know, on the other hand maybe the truth will come out in a court of law!!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
once its on the internet, it will be cached for ever. You can still read all posts in Google cache, Google:
Code:
site:pprune.org Indy Hiatt
Last edited by riverrock83; 25th May 2012 at 08:58. Reason: to remove emoticon
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Close but no cigar.
riverrock83 wrote:
Like so much of what is posted on pprune, and the web in general, this is nearly true.
once its on the internet, it will be cached for ever. You can still read all posts in Google cache, Google:
Code:
siteprune.org Indy Hiatt
Code:
siteprune.org Indy Hiatt
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect that Pprune or the OP decided it was in their best interest to remove the thread. A good move in my opinion because no matter what the person was supposed to have done or not, airing someones private medical details on a public forum could give very reasonable grounds for a court case - as it has wider ramifications than simply "Aviation" - future employment, medical insurances, etc etc.....And if untrue, then I would suspect a court case would ensue.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, IMHO it served it's purpose, IE it alerted people to a potential risk,whilst the appropriate authorities chewed the cud and got their backsides into gear.
like it or not, GEP performed a public service with his initial posting.
I reiterate, he may have been somewhat indelicate in posting the medical details to substantiate his claim, but I'm damn sure "Towers" would NOT have allowed the O.P. let alone the ensuing thread, to stand, if there had been the slightest risk of litigation for Libel or Defamation of character.
For whatever reason, the subject acted in a reckless and unprofessional manner and I, for one, am glad that some holes in the Swiss Cheese have been blocked BEFORE they had a chance to line up.
GEP stuck his head above the parapet, he should be applauded, not pelted with rotten fruit.
like it or not, GEP performed a public service with his initial posting.
I reiterate, he may have been somewhat indelicate in posting the medical details to substantiate his claim, but I'm damn sure "Towers" would NOT have allowed the O.P. let alone the ensuing thread, to stand, if there had been the slightest risk of litigation for Libel or Defamation of character.
For whatever reason, the subject acted in a reckless and unprofessional manner and I, for one, am glad that some holes in the Swiss Cheese have been blocked BEFORE they had a chance to line up.
GEP stuck his head above the parapet, he should be applauded, not pelted with rotten fruit.
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thread was removed as I'm relieved to say it had served its purpose.
For the seekers of dark clouds and lead linings no contact from m'learned friends - just flying shown to have ceased and unlikely to resume in the short term.
Rob
For the seekers of dark clouds and lead linings no contact from m'learned friends - just flying shown to have ceased and unlikely to resume in the short term.
Rob
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 2nm from Old Warden
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a daily reader, an infrequent poster, and a PPL, I'm glad it has gone. I think the spirit of the intention was sound, the execution was not, and if flying has ceased there is little point keeping the information in he public domain.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect GEP had a letter from the renowned Legal Firm 'Weavers of Warwickshire' which scared him off.
I would be rather worried too if that Legal Firm wrote to me.
I would be rather worried too if that Legal Firm wrote to me.
Last edited by coldair; 25th May 2012 at 14:22.