Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Microlight Down near Kincardine, Clackmannanshire


Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Microlight Down near Kincardine, Clackmannanshire

Old 16th April 2012 | 10:48
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 1
From: Lochwinnoch, Renfrewshire
Pilot has now been named.
Graham Borland is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2012 | 11:47
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Of note that that is not the name of the registered owner on G-INFO.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2012 | 13:46
  #23 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Lamb and Flag
Also of note is the CAA seem happy to state to the media that, as far as they are concerned, it is de-registered. So G-INFO would seem fairly accurate!
Sir Herbert Gussett is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2012 | 21:47
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
beeb article here now says:
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said Mr Paterson was unlicensed and the microlight unregistered.
I feel for his family. So easy to be flippant but a life has been lost, and every life is precious.
riverrock83 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 07:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktoo
With the greatest respect to his family and acknowledging a life has been lost let's not overlook how it happened, or indeed the apparent disregard the pilot had for the law and safety of others!

Taking it at face value I find it difficult to get all sentimental.

BB
BabyBear is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 07:45
  #26 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 7
From: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Presumably the CAA would not know if this pilot had a non-UK licence.
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 08:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 549
Likes: 2
From: The frozen north....
Presumably the CAA would not know if this pilot had a non-UK licence. NS
I'm led to believe that the chap had purchased the Microlight on ebay and enquired about lessons however the cost put him off. I've heard quite a bit more but I'll leave it at that for the moment and let the investigation run its course.

UA
Unusual Attitude is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 08:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
Presumably the CAA would not know if this pilot had a non-UK licence.
NS
It wouldn't matter, because you cannot fly a UK microlight on a foreign licence.
patowalker is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 08:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Aye you can.

You just need any JAR license with a SEP Class rating.

Just like I can fly one on my UK JAR ATPL SEP class rating with zero training if I was stupid enough to try.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 09:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
To quote someone on here:
The CAA is entitled to (and does) permit JAR-FCL licence holders with SEP ratings to fly Microlights and has specified the requirements. There is no obligation for any other State to follow the same procedure or to accept the CAA's National Position.
patowalker is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 09:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Yep so anyone from any JAR country with a JAR license not a national one can come to the UK and fly G reg microlights on there JAR SEP class rating.

You just can't presume you can do it the other way round though. And for that matter they may not be permited to do the same thing at home.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 09:40
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
I see what you mean. Very strange indeed.
patowalker is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 10:05
  #33 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Originally Posted by patowalker
I see what you mean. Very strange indeed.
The issue of permissions to fly microlights, for other licence holders, has always been rather odd.

The issue should be simple - they're different, but not that different. So you need training, or you are probably going to break it, and possibly yourself. The amount of training will depend upon the pilot and the aeroplane.

But depending upon whether you have an ICAO licence, a UK licence, a JAR licence, or an NPPL - all of which you might be quite legally flying, say, a PA28 with - the rules change about what training and testing you need to fly a microlight.

Which is daft. It really should be the same for everybody. Which is to say MANDATORY differences training. The only debating point really is then whether it should be just signed off by an instructor, or requires an examiner.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 10:12
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Your not really needing to test the full skill set so a sign off solo by an instructor should be fine just like a tailwheel differences in my opinion.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 10:17
  #35 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Originally Posted by mad_jock
Your not really needing to test the full skill set so a sign off solo by an instructor should be fine just like a tailwheel differences in my opinion.
That is my opinion as well.

But my strongest opinion is that everybody should have to meet the same requirements, rather than jumping around depending upon what form of "heavy metal" licence you happen to hold.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 10:26
  #36 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 7
From: Sometimes north, sometimes south
you cannot fly a UK microlight on a foreign licence
and
Aye you can.
You just need any JAR license with a SEP Class rating
Hang on. What about ANO Article 62 which states:
any licence which authorises the holder to act as a member of the flight crew of an aircraft and is granted:
(a) under the law of a Contracting State other than the United Kingdom but which is not a JAA licence...is, unless the CAA gives a direction to the contrary, deemed to be a licence rendered valid under this Order.
Surely that allows non-JAR PPLs to fly G-reg microlights? Where does it say that the "deemed valid" provision doesn't extend to microlights?
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 10:38
  #37 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Any ICAO licence with something equivalent to SEP should do. I've come across people with FAA PPL(SEP) licences flying microlights, so far as I could tell legally.

But in my opinion differences training should be mandatory for everybody. Either when going to microlights, or when switching control systems between 3-axis, flexwing, and/or PPC.

In the meantime, any pilot who is not an idiot should get differences training, whether legally required or not.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 11:41
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
In France you cannot fly a microlight on a French or foreign PPL. So, the UK CAA could not deem a French PPL valid for microlights.



Depuis l’arrêté du 4 mai 2000, il n'y a plus d'équivalence.
Si vous êtes titulaire d'un brevet de pilote avion, d'hélicoptère, de planeur ou de ballon libre, ou encore d'une licence étrangère, vous êtes uniquement dispensé du certificat d'aptitude théorique commun ULM.

Détail d'un texte
patowalker is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 11:50
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
The CAA can deem valid anything it likes on a G reg and its airspace. It got nothing to do with the French CAA.

It couldn't let a french licensed pilot fly a F reg, in UK airspace or a G reg in French airspace.

As I said they might not be allowed to do the same thing at home.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 12:04
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Plumpton Green
any licence which authorises the holder to act as a member of the flight crew of an aircraft and is granted:
(a) under the law of a Contracting State other than the United Kingdom but which is not a JAA licence...is, unless the CAA gives a direction to the contrary, deemed to be a licence rendered valid under this Order.
MJ
I disagree. The French PPL does not authorise the holder to fly a microlight, so the CAA can hardly override that. It would be different if the Contracting State did not specifically exclude microlights from PPL privileges.

In the event of an incident, the foreign licence would need to be verified with the issuing state and the microlight exclusion would come to light.
patowalker is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.