Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cranfield - Night Rating

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Cranfield - Night Rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2012, 22:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: EGLG
Age: 36
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cranfield - Night Rating

Hello, I am hoping to start a NR. I was looking into OAA as Im doing my ATPLs there, but instructor/aircraft availability is an issue.

I have decided Cranfield, as I have friends on campus, so I could complete the 5 hours within 1-2weeks.

My options are Cranfield Flying School, Bonus Aviation & Billins Air Services.(Any others?)

I've done a few searches, and Bonus seem to have alot of positive comments.

I fly PA28s, and would prefer to keep flying Pipers. Any one done their Night rating at Cranfield? Any advice on which school?
Airbusboy is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 07:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Billins Air Services would get my vote, honest realistic prices and no attitude.

Treat the change to a Cessna as a chance to widen your experience.
A and C is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 07:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,233
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
I've flown with all three for one reason or another, and would also recommend Billins FOR WHAT YOU WANT. On the other hand, if you are planning a CPL, go with Bonus as they are a well regarded CPL school and it gives you a chance to decide if you like them or not.

Billins has a C150 and a couple of Grumman AA5s, so either way, you'll get a change from the PA28. I'm biased and prefer the AA5 (having about 140 hours in PA28s, it took me about 2 hour to become a thorough Grumman convert), but they are more expensive than the Cessna.

Bonus is likely to use a PA38, which I confess I do have a soft spot for as an aeroplane, particularly for training - although many people don't like them much. But make your own mind up.

I agree, Billins will be cheaper, and is a lot less formal. On the other hand Bonus will get you closer to the CPL training environment if you're heading in that direction anyway.

You may detect that I'm avoiding mentioning CFT. That is correct, I am.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 07:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bonus would get my vote .. and business .. then I have to admit bias .. I loved flying the PA38 :-)
Teddy Robinson is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 09:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever i lay my hat, that's my home...
Age: 44
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd vote Billins and have just gone through and done IMC and Night there; I liked it as it was very much "what you see is what", so you get and none of the crap and politics that I have seen elsewhere.

Also felt I was taught to fly with the IMC and Night, not just pass an exam and tick boxes and that for me was the BIG positive!!!
italianjon is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 10:29
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: EGLG
Age: 36
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input guys. Now its between Bonus and Billins. Genghis appreciate the hint about CFT

italianjon, did you fly in the Grumman for the NR?

I have approx 150 TT. Between the AA5 and the Tomahawk, without going into tonnes of detail, which aircraft do you feel transition is better from a Cherokee/Archer. I've heard about the aggressive stall characteristics of the Tomahawk, but that doesn't scare me and would not affect my choice.
Airbusboy is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 10:55
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,233
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
You are not going to have trouble converting to any of the C150, AA5 or the Tomahawk from the PA28, although the AA5 is probably the closest to the PA28 in terms of ergonomics and handling, and the C150 and PA38 pretty similar in terms of magnitude of differences.

The Tomahawk doesn't have "aggressive" stall characteristics - it has plenty of warning, a good solid back stick force to stall it - it just tends to drop a wing and make you do the recovery right. More that the PA28 has incredibly benign stalling characteristics.

With 150 hours, presumably over less than 4 years, and hopefully a willingness to spend an evening with the manual before you fly any new aeroplane, you'll not have a problem.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 11:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever i lay my hat, that's my home...
Age: 44
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did it in the 150, but really only because that is what I was using for the IMC so it was nice to have the same plane.

A word of advice though, that someone offered me and it turned out to be so true... Never, Never, Never go flying at night unless you have at least a torch in EVERY single pocket you own...

I learnt a comical lesson when the Dome Light Bulb went at 2000 feet over Milton Keynes... luckily the person who gave me that advice did have that many torches and offered some help (after he stopped laughing when my one torch had a flat battery - I bet he's reading this in which case thanks mate, I'll drop you a line after I've looked at the flying clubs this weekend and let you know what I think of our German Cousins and Aviation!)...

Oh and also some other stuff I learned, is if you are fond of red filters, make sure you can easily remove it, or carry a white torch... because the CAA maps are crap under red light.

And make sure you have a camera.... quite simple stunning views of North London and things!!!!!!

After I finished the IMC And Night, my only regret is not doing it sooner!!!! Was really enjoyable getting those!!!
italianjon is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 11:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll second the torch in every pocket. I use a head torch, one of the ones that you can flick between red and white LED's, I carry spare batteries for it and the small mag light I keep in my pocket (not in your flight bag, you don't want to be fiddling about in the dark looking for something by touch). I did mine in a PA28 for the simple reason that it has the best instrument lighting of any of our club a/c.
thing is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 12:05
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,233
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Nowadays, I also keep half a dozen cylumes (yellow works best) in my flight bag. They are brilliant whilst night flying - and bought on eBay in a pack, about a quid each.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 12:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever i lay my hat, that's my home...
Age: 44
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a quid of ebay???? I hope they are Certified and Approved Yellow things haha!
italianjon is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2012, 12:31
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: EGLG
Age: 36
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol..Thanks for the torch/lighting advice. Will let you know how everything goes.
Airbusboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.