Detonation caused by lean mixture
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Detonation caused by lean mixture
I've been studying for my aircraft tech ground exam and reading about the hazards of over-leaning the mixture. It brings to mind a time when I did a solo flight and managed to taxi to the holding point and do power checks with lean mixture, right up to the point where the checklist told me to check 'Mixture Rich'. I had noticed it seemed to be rough running, and of course increasing to full rich sorted that out. Now I've read about the theory, I'm wondering if I did damage to the engine. How would one know?
Shows the power of using checklists, but I wouldn't like to think I've damaged the engine.
Shows the power of using checklists, but I wouldn't like to think I've damaged the engine.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You cannot damage the engine by over-leaning, at the relatively low power settings involved in ground ops.
It is normal practice among advanced pilots to lean during taxi, to the maximum degree possible. It keeps the plugs clean, and you cannot takeoff with it because the engine would just cough and splutter if you went to full throttle like that.
In general, to cause detonation, you need the wrong mixture, a high power setting (a high combustion chamber pressure) and a very high CHT. Or the wrong grade of fuel (unsufficient octane rating, etc).
It is normal practice among advanced pilots to lean during taxi, to the maximum degree possible. It keeps the plugs clean, and you cannot takeoff with it because the engine would just cough and splutter if you went to full throttle like that.
In general, to cause detonation, you need the wrong mixture, a high power setting (a high combustion chamber pressure) and a very high CHT. Or the wrong grade of fuel (unsufficient octane rating, etc).
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think you can damage the engine anyway, according to some, if you lean beyond optimum mixture during cruise. The reason is that the temps drop off again with a lean mixture which is why LOP operations work nicely in some aeroplanes (mainly where the fuel is metered correctly - i.e. fuel injected).
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 36
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm no expert on the subject but it seems that the likelihood of detonation is over-estimated in the texts (and possibly instruction) that PPL students generally come across. I'm sure that were I to delve into my Trevor Thom books I'd convince myself that moving the mixture lever away from the full rich position at any time would promptly blow-up the engine.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 37
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do a search by threat subject for "LOP" (lean of peak), and "lean". There are many threads with some very valuable information. Its an area of knowledge greatly lacking in many of the references and flight training organisations. Even ground-leaning for example is a great idea, but many new instructors (and some experienced) look at me like I'm going to make the engine explode.
Just the fact that a lean mixture doesn't magically cause detonation on its own blew my mind when I was a new CPL. There's far to much to write about in one post, but my advice is always to keep researching the material. Don't trust things that refer to "over-lean" or "leaning too agressively", because these statements are only half true and in my opinion indicate a reliance on bar-talk myth. Many of the operating practices that people use such as lean of peak, and wide open throttle likely aren't possible in a carby training aircraft, but the principles behind them are valuable in understanding what happens inside an engine at different power and mixture settings.
Or read the bible:
Pelican's Perch - More Stories
There's one heck of a lot in there though. I spent many months reading, understanding, not understanding, re-reading, and pondering the information in Mr Deakin's work. Now I preach about him like its a cult.
Just the fact that a lean mixture doesn't magically cause detonation on its own blew my mind when I was a new CPL. There's far to much to write about in one post, but my advice is always to keep researching the material. Don't trust things that refer to "over-lean" or "leaning too agressively", because these statements are only half true and in my opinion indicate a reliance on bar-talk myth. Many of the operating practices that people use such as lean of peak, and wide open throttle likely aren't possible in a carby training aircraft, but the principles behind them are valuable in understanding what happens inside an engine at different power and mixture settings.
Or read the bible:
Pelican's Perch - More Stories
There's one heck of a lot in there though. I spent many months reading, understanding, not understanding, re-reading, and pondering the information in Mr Deakin's work. Now I preach about him like its a cult.
It is very difficult to get a non turbocharged carburated engine to detonate. Assuming proper fuel about the only way I would think detonation could possibly occur would be a prolonged low airspeed climb with the carb heat full on and the engine leaned to 50 rich of peak. This will result in very high CHT's due to the heated induction air and hottest flame from a "best power" mixture. Under any normal operating procedures the risk of detonation is virtually zero. This is doubly so for the run of the mill 4 bangers because they were all designed for 80/87 0r 90/96 fuel but usually operated on the far more common 100 Octane 100LL fuel, which will dramatically increase the detonation margins.
It is a different story however for some of the high output turbocharged engines. These engines can, even in "normal" operation have very small detonation margins. There was a spate of early inflight engine failures caused by detonation in early Piper Malibu's for instance. These engines must be operated with care to keep the CHT's down and respect the EGT and TIT limits.
It is a different story however for some of the high output turbocharged engines. These engines can, even in "normal" operation have very small detonation margins. There was a spate of early inflight engine failures caused by detonation in early Piper Malibu's for instance. These engines must be operated with care to keep the CHT's down and respect the EGT and TIT limits.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect you will do more good than harm by taxing lean.
The check is there for exactly that reason, if the taxi was always full rich there would be no need to check it was rich before tafe off (albeit a little tongue in cheek being as it is a critical check).
Of course there may even be times you dont want to depart fully rich, but that is another story.
The check is there for exactly that reason, if the taxi was always full rich there would be no need to check it was rich before tafe off (albeit a little tongue in cheek being as it is a critical check).
Of course there may even be times you dont want to depart fully rich, but that is another story.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been studying for my aircraft tech ground exam and reading about the hazards of over-leaning the mixture. It brings to mind a time when I did a solo flight and managed to taxi to the holding point and do power checks with lean mixture, right up to the point where the checklist told me to check 'Mixture Rich'. I had noticed it seemed to be rough running, and of course increasing to full rich sorted that out. Now I've read about the theory, I'm wondering if I did damage to the engine. How would one know?
That said there are signs of repeated running on too-lean a mixture, valve seats getting burned etc.
Amazed how few people are taught how to use the big scary red lever.
Smithy
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Captain Smithy
But before power checks or advancing the throttle you must put the mixture back to fully rich, otherwise the engine will start to pink, as you found... you probably didn't damage the engine, I think repeated abuse would cause a failure, but you won't be able to tell until the donk one day suddenly goes bang.
That said there are signs of repeated running on too-lean a mixture, valve seats getting burned etc.
That said there are signs of repeated running on too-lean a mixture, valve seats getting burned etc.
Burned valve seats are usually signs of consistently extremely high CHTs (450°F and higher) and you will usually see this temperatures in prolonged climb at Vy or slower (depends on the engine and the engine cowling) or perhaps in poorly cowled engines in cruise with mixture set to best power (50° - 100°F ROP). If the engine is capable of (better said: if air/fuel mixture is consistent in all cylinders) running 50°F lean of peak, you will get very low CHTs than 50°F rich of peak - with the same EGT. Lycoming itself supports leaning techniques and if you read their Flyer publication, you will see that you can set whatever mixture you like (provided the engine isn't running rough) with power settings below 75%, but usually in terms of SFC, leaning too much on the lean side isn't very productive, since power starts to decrease quite rapidly after let's say 50°F LOP.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlyingStone
You are correct, I don't think you can ruin an engine at power check RPM but depending on how much you've leaned the mixture it will start pinking. If it's a long taxi (not usually at my home base, but at my old airport it was a very long taxi) then I'll have the mixture back pretty far.
Interesting info on ROP/LOP, quite (most) often the problem is that the mixture isn't the same for all cylinders, so you end up having to compromise and often that leaves you running ROP, however if its possible to run 50 LOP it's a good idea. Also cockpit instrumentation is a problem - the most many of us have to go on is an EGT, but more often than not there isn't even that, I have to lean using just the tacho because in the aircraft I fly that's all there is, so its ROP for me. But if you've got the instrumentation...
You are correct, I don't think you can ruin an engine at power check RPM but depending on how much you've leaned the mixture it will start pinking. If it's a long taxi (not usually at my home base, but at my old airport it was a very long taxi) then I'll have the mixture back pretty far.
Interesting info on ROP/LOP, quite (most) often the problem is that the mixture isn't the same for all cylinders, so you end up having to compromise and often that leaves you running ROP, however if its possible to run 50 LOP it's a good idea. Also cockpit instrumentation is a problem - the most many of us have to go on is an EGT, but more often than not there isn't even that, I have to lean using just the tacho because in the aircraft I fly that's all there is, so its ROP for me. But if you've got the instrumentation...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Behind a computer screen
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rough running with the mixture pulled back is (in the case of injected engines) uneven distribution of fuel into the cylinders. This will increase vibration, generally not good for the engine, but not itself a risk of detonation.
h
h
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.. .. .. which will be evident by the EGT and CHT readings for each cylinder. I am not sure I am that much of a fan of LOP without being able to monitor each cylinder, rather run richer, accept the extra fuel burn in the knowledge that you are not damaging a cylinder that has a blocked injector or some other issue.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is far safer to have a partially blocked injector when at peak or LOP than ROP. Having a partial blockage when ROP could put this one cylinder in the 'Red Box' and you might not detect it. When at peak or LOP having a partial blockage might cause some roughness but would immediately be noticed.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Captain Smithy
You are correct, I don't think you can ruin an engine at power check RPM but depending on how much you've leaned the mixture it will start pinking. If it's a long taxi (not usually at my home base, but at my old airport it was a very long taxi) then I'll have the mixture back pretty far.
Here are couple of quotes from Lycoming Flyer Key Operations:
First, we must know that cruise power for Lycoming normally aspirated engines is generally considered to be 55% to 75% of the maximum power for which the engine is rated. At these power settings, the engine may be leaned at any altitude.
It is also important to understand that leaning to roughness at the engine manufacturer’s recommended cruise power is not an indication of detonation, but indicates normal characteristics of distribution to the individual cylinders. The roughness indicates that the leanest cylinder has become so lean, it is beginning to miss. This is typical of an engine with a float-type carburetor. Damage, to an engine from leaning does not occur at the manufacturer’s recommended cruise power, but takes place at higher than cruise power.
On the other hand, with any direct-drive normally aspirated Lycoming engine, the pilot can and should lean the mixture at any altitude as long as the aircraft is in cruise configuration at 75% power or less.
Again, we repeat that maximum leaning (peak EGT) does not damage an engine at the engine manufacturer’s recommended cruise power. Damage is caused by maximum leaning at higher than recommended cruise power where the manuals do not spell it out or allow it, and when the aircraft does not have a complete set of reliable engine instruments to protect the power plants. Excessive leaning under the latter high power conditions can cause detonation and/or preignition and possible engine failure.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Behind a computer screen
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember somewhere in Deakin's columns he states that about 50f ROP is the place most likely to do damage, which is exactly where many schools teach to run the mixture (pull it back until it gets rough, then push it in a bit). Any thoughts?
We never operate our normally aspirated IO360 above 75%, but do lean quite aggressively. If Deakin's statement is true, would we be better running AT LOP or are we going to risk damage to the exhaust?
h
We never operate our normally aspirated IO360 above 75%, but do lean quite aggressively. If Deakin's statement is true, would we be better running AT LOP or are we going to risk damage to the exhaust?
h
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We never operate our normally aspirated IO360 above 75%, but do lean quite aggressively. If Deakin's statement is true, would we be better running AT LOP or are we going to risk damage to the exhaust?
A CHT and EGT monitor on each cyliner is not a costly piece of kit and the risks in MO of running LOP with a miss behaving cylinder and not knowing are too great.
You don't necessarily need Gami injectors to run LOP. It depends on how well matched the current injectors are. I manage a Panther Navajo & run it LOP in cruise as standard. It runs fine at 50 deg LOP although fairly quickly becomes rough once more than ~60-70deg LOP (not that it's worth going that lean. Too far off the efficiency curve)
Its manual approves 50 deg using just the factory single point probe although I had the owner fit an EDM 760 to it before doing so, other than a single demonstration of fuel savings & lower temps to show him the difference. I'm just not comfortable operating close to margins without being sure that each cylinder is OK. Interestingly, the EDM probes showed different cylinders were more limiting for EGT & CHT than the factory fitted probes. Not that they were outside limits but certainly closer. With the EDM I can make sure every cylinder is comfortably cool.
Its manual approves 50 deg using just the factory single point probe although I had the owner fit an EDM 760 to it before doing so, other than a single demonstration of fuel savings & lower temps to show him the difference. I'm just not comfortable operating close to margins without being sure that each cylinder is OK. Interestingly, the EDM probes showed different cylinders were more limiting for EGT & CHT than the factory fitted probes. Not that they were outside limits but certainly closer. With the EDM I can make sure every cylinder is comfortably cool.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brussels
Age: 29
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Below 40%NRP and above 75%NRP detonations and preignition are most likely to happen. Still, as stated above, it's extremely rare. But during a long taxi pay close attention to your mixture setting because running to lean with an air-cooled engine at less than 40% will cause a nice rise in CHT.
Yann
Edit: forgot to mention that when running to rich carbon deposits form in the cylinders and can cause detonation, so leaning is good practice during taxi.
Yann
Edit: forgot to mention that when running to rich carbon deposits form in the cylinders and can cause detonation, so leaning is good practice during taxi.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAYE
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GEM
Here is an interesting read about leaning, EGT, CHT & TIT from INSIGHT's GEM Pilot's Guide . I used a GEM for the past twenty years. Not only a GEM allows to lean exactly to the optimum, but also helps recognize magneto troubles and many other snags way before they become problems.