'water aided' landings.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'water aided' landings.
So, I'm sure plenty of us have seen the alaskan bush pilot landings where they aquaplane on the mains up to the gravel bar, then stop with the tail in the air.
What I'm wondering, and purely out of curiosity is why? I'd expect the limiting factor to be getting out (i.e. takeoff), not landing...
What I'm wondering, and purely out of curiosity is why? I'd expect the limiting factor to be getting out (i.e. takeoff), not landing...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which was exactly what set me thinking: "The nearest gravel bar is too short to land on using normal techniques". So after a bit of splashing around he arrives, adds two sturdy blokes with backpacks, and a raft, then takes off..
All of which really doesn't add up: I'm sure the takeoff run would have been rather longer than the landing run.
All of which really doesn't add up: I'm sure the takeoff run would have been rather longer than the landing run.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sexy eskimos aside, there was a nice bit of production spice added to "Flying Wild Alaska" if you look at it closely. Scene's varied with the C180 going one minute from 29" bushwheels to 8.50's all in the one landing on more than once.... Good show and dramatization aside I'd like the box set for xmas!
Irish
Irish
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the good news is there will be a second season! I think he started the take-off run in the water as well didn't he? That might explain away some of the extra take-off ground roll but I wonder whether the water aided landing was just for effect! After all someone had to drop the camera-man off in the first place so that he could film it.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've watched the Big rocks, Lonp Props DVs a few times. In that there is a fair big of discussion on water landings.
Using the water to land is usually to give a better line for the approach. There is quite a bit of discussion regarding the lowest speed at which the tyres. still aquaplane - between 22 and 28mph for the types in the DVD, needless to say prematurely cutting the power is said to be potentially disasterous.
When taking off water is generally not used much. Where it is it seems to be only for short, very short, periods - just the last couple of seconds. So certainly it seems to be a little unbalanced in terms of its use. From the DVDs it seems to more a 'because you can' - otherwise it would be used much more for taking off.
Using the water to land is usually to give a better line for the approach. There is quite a bit of discussion regarding the lowest speed at which the tyres. still aquaplane - between 22 and 28mph for the types in the DVD, needless to say prematurely cutting the power is said to be potentially disasterous.
When taking off water is generally not used much. Where it is it seems to be only for short, very short, periods - just the last couple of seconds. So certainly it seems to be a little unbalanced in terms of its use. From the DVDs it seems to more a 'because you can' - otherwise it would be used much more for taking off.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the clip that started the train of thought:
Impressive Landing In Alaska [VIDEO]
Confess I'd have thought that a short field, back of drag curve approach could've dropped it shorter, not that the skiing doesn't look cool. What gasax is saying makes more sense to me.
Impressive Landing In Alaska [VIDEO]
Confess I'd have thought that a short field, back of drag curve approach could've dropped it shorter, not that the skiing doesn't look cool. What gasax is saying makes more sense to me.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember reading an article on this some years back. As far as the takeoff went the pilot being interviewed was describing takeoffs starting in up to a foot of water. I can only imagine the increase in take off roll due to poor initial acceleration but given a tyre of 29" I can certainly see it as possible.
Definately going to get wet if the engine stops though!
Definately going to get wet if the engine stops though!