Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

EASA PPL 70 Hours!!


Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

EASA PPL 70 Hours!!

Old 10th June 2011 | 23:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Chatham ASR
EASA PPL 70 Hours!!

As set out in the EASA licensing http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/620/c-May2011v3.pdf a PPL will now account to at least 70 hours. (I think)

With flying being the cost that it is, is that a really a good idea? I understand the safety aspect, but i see no elevation of privileges of the license (correct me if I'm wrong) so why the extra 25(at £150/hr) hours onto the minumum?

Any thoughts?

Last edited by Milton1995; 10th June 2011 at 23:23. Reason: spelling.
Milton1995 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th June 2011 | 00:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow, UK
I only found a reference to the number 70 on page 19. I think that relates to the required experience for converting an existing national license (might be a UK PPL or NPPL?) to an EASA PPL. It says it's for non-JAR licenses, too, and earlier in the doc says that JAR PPLs will be converted automatically. So I don't think it's about ab-initio training (if that's the right term).

Interesting bit in section 6.2 (page 9) on the IMCr. It's no guarantee but nice to know that EASA are at least trying to placate us. I'm studying for it now and quite keen to be able to actually use it - legally - for more than a year!
douglas.lindsay is offline  
Reply
Old 11th June 2011 | 05:40
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
The 70 hour figure refers to the conversion of an old-style pre-JAA UK PPL into an EASA part-FCL PPL.

You need to have 70 hours or more on aeroplanes and to 'demonstrate the use of radio navigation' in order to convert an old-style pre-JAR PPL(A) into an EASA part-FCL PPL - as has always been the case for converting to a JAR-FCL PPL(A).

There are no changes to UK-issued JAR-FCL PPLs; these will automatically be considered EASA part-FCL PPLs and will only need to be physically exchanged when the 5-year re-issue date is due, whereupon it will become a lifetime licence.

It would seem that with an EASA part-FCL PPL, you will be able to exercise the full range of Rule 28 VFR privileges - rather than being restricted as is the current situation unless you hold an IMCR.
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 11th June 2011 | 06:56
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 12
From: UK
You will still be able to take your PPL skill test after just 35 hours as you have been able to for the past 11 years. 45 hours is required for licence issue and may include the test. EASA does not propose to change this. So far I have only met one person who actually passed the test with just 35 hours under his belt.
Whopity is offline  
Reply
Old 11th June 2011 | 07:11
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
I have to say WOW... hats off to Whopity and his astonishing knowledge of the regs...

I had never heard of that one and I bet neither have 99% of schools.

BTW here is more reading on the same stuff.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th June 2011 | 08:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
A few schools have. I did one who sat his test after 38 hous and then went on to do his night rating.

The boss didn't like this arrangement though and decided it wasn't to happen again as he felt diddled out of the night qual and bitched about not getting an additional 5 hours out of the punter.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2011 | 22:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: UK, mainly
Wasn't a boss up north was it?? Pointless moan anyway, the punter could have done the NQ before the LST and still done the whole lot without paying extra!
madlandrover is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2011 | 15:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Aye thats the one.

It was the punter not paying extra that he didn't like, which ever way you did it.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2011 | 20:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: UK, mainly
He wasn't the only one. Think the death knell was the other Director moaning about lending a hi-vis to a paying AOC customer rather than forcing them to buy one to complete the flight!
madlandrover is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.