Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Prop Strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th April 2001 | 21:24
  #1 (permalink)  
DOC.400
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Prop Strike

My plane is grounded due prop strike with 1500hrs total engine and airframe time. Oh god I'm depressed!!! This is five strikes and three new props in 11 years!! None of which I've been responsible for I hasten to add!!
Insurance job again...Lycoming recommend a complete strip down for internal inspection.
Would you:
a) Claim on insurance, go for strip down, new prop and put back extg unit;
b) Time to put a new engine in (Thank goodness we have an engine fund!);
c) Ignore Lycoming and just put a new prop on, + oil analysis every ten hours;
Answers on a postcard please!!!!!!!
 
Old 7th April 2001 | 01:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Saab Dastard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow

Doc,

Bad luck - still you aren't missing much flying with all this crappy weather. Saying that, Sunday is supposed to be rather nice.

How much life is left in the engine - when would you expect to have to replace it anyway, prop strikes excepted? What has been done after the previous 4 strikes?

Could you do (a) and go for a re-build to zero time the engine? Would there be much saving over (b)?

BTW, if you choose (c) I will never fly with you again

SD

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing...
A lot of knowledge can be truly devastating!
 
Old 7th April 2001 | 02:13
  #3 (permalink)  
Warped Factor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

DOC,

Very sorry to hear that. Just curious to know if it happened at WW?

And if repairs drag on give me a shout if you want to aviate.

WF.
 
Old 7th April 2001 | 12:40
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
Post

DOC 400 to take a look at the options #1 is part of the answer get what money you can from the insurance and then go for #2 as the engine is not worth putting back together with only 500 left to TBO (dont think of running on condition after 2000 hrs it just costs more in the long run.)
Dont think about #3 as this may not give warning of shock load damage in the wheel case and you dont want the oil pump to stop without warning........do you ?

Having owned DR400 ,s for the last 20 years i,v never had a prop strike and i think to is time your group take a look to see if these problems have a common thread.
A and C is offline  
Old 10th April 2001 | 22:07
  #5 (permalink)  
DOC.400
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Thanx for your replies chasps -I am SO depressed! With new prop and engine strip down we're looking at no plane for two months. Interesting comments about increased costs over 2000 hours -I'll take that to the meeting we;'re having, but would like more info A&C -I'll e you direct. Our engineer reckons we should have 900 hours left on this engine easily.....That would take about 5-6 years!!!
There is no pattern to strikes, one was due an uncontrollable shimmy, two stupidity and the rest carelessness and possible unfamiliarity with the plane.
I hasten to add, I've NEVER dinged it and am very aware of the restricted clearance!!!
Somebody take me flying please.......still think of the money I'll save....not.
 
Old 11th April 2001 | 02:26
  #6 (permalink)  
AC-DC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I disagree with A&C regarding the extra costs after the 2000h mark.
My engine is around the 2500h TTSN and about 350h STO. It burns 1l of oil per 6.5h compression is between 74 and 78 on all cylinders. Every 25h I send oil for analysis and change it every 50h or 5 months.
Recently I had to remove 1 cylinder due to broken stud (the exhaust had to be removed), we have removed another one and had a good visual check.
The verdict was that I can keep running it for another 500h.
When the engine will have to come down (2000h or 20,000h) I want it to have new camshaft, new bearings, new pistons and cylinders, etc. I don’t believe in repolished camshafts and other corner cuttings.
Saying that, if I was in your shoes I would go for a new/overhauled engine. Put the insurance money into a good use.
 
Old 11th April 2001 | 12:35
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
Post

The recomended engine TBO is based on the most economic time to OH.
After the recomended TBO the crankshaft bearing journals start to wear oval and as the crank can move more in the bearing it also wears oval ,the chances are that if the engine is run "on condition" for a long time it will take the crank below the regrind limits and so put up the cost of OH by about 20%.
I have no doubt that some contributors to this forum have got lucky and saved them selfs some money but across the lycoming fleet this will not be the case.
A and C is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.