Airmanship.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Age: 44
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airmanship.
I realise that I am just a lowly PPL student with only 10 hours to my name but can I just ask people to keep a better look out when flying.
I was with my instructor down at Lydd last Saturday and I was amazed at the attitude (or lack of it) towards keeping an eye out for other aircraft. I was second in the circuit when one muppet decided to totally ignore all other aircraft and cut in ahead of us on final. He was waaaaay too close and nearly succeeded in putting it on top of another a/c that was taking off.
On the return journey to Redhill, we were "carved up" by a helicopter who clearly hadn't bothered to look round and check for others in the vicinity!
It seems to me that some PPLs just become oblvious to others in the air once they pass their exams.
I was with my instructor down at Lydd last Saturday and I was amazed at the attitude (or lack of it) towards keeping an eye out for other aircraft. I was second in the circuit when one muppet decided to totally ignore all other aircraft and cut in ahead of us on final. He was waaaaay too close and nearly succeeded in putting it on top of another a/c that was taking off.
On the return journey to Redhill, we were "carved up" by a helicopter who clearly hadn't bothered to look round and check for others in the vicinity!
It seems to me that some PPLs just become oblvious to others in the air once they pass their exams.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sennadog,. . Don`t blame it all on PPLs. The chopper was more likely to be a CPL.. .I had an airprox with a chopper at 400 ft on the climb out. At the subsequent enquiry he said he was programming his GPS at the time and didn`t realise that the airfield was active. Never did find out what he was doing cruising cross country at 400 ft though.. .The `prox` was about 30 ft exactly the same level by the way. It also taught me that your lookout needs to be 360 degrees too, he came at us from the port rear quarter.
Mike W
Mike W
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Age: 44
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Skylark, I'm not. The helo was a separate incident and was much later in the flight. I'm not blaming PPLs as such - I'm just trying to remind everyone in general that one element of good airmanship is to maintain a good look out for other aircraft.
The circuit at Lydd was generally fine apart from some of the "more experienced" pilots who appeared to be a bit clueless IMO.
The circuit at Lydd was generally fine apart from some of the "more experienced" pilots who appeared to be a bit clueless IMO.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chichester, UK
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It happens - I had a similar experience recently when doing circuits at Goodwood. Some pillock gave the AFIS a bashing because they wouldn't clear him for take off - they can't, of course - and then did a sharp right hand turn after take off and cut straight in front of me when I was downwind.
Not quite as bad as the chap who kept trying to land on 28 when 32 was the active runway. After a couple of attempts AFIS asked him if he had enough fuel to go back where he came from. Affirm came the reply, after which it was "suggested" that he might return there.... <img src="smile.gif" border="0">
Not quite as bad as the chap who kept trying to land on 28 when 32 was the active runway. After a couple of attempts AFIS asked him if he had enough fuel to go back where he came from. Affirm came the reply, after which it was "suggested" that he might return there.... <img src="smile.gif" border="0">
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Near a castle!
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. Been there, done that. Finsishing my skill test, and on finals at about 500ft I had a microlight cut in right infront of me. He had no idea I was there. I've also heard of a few peaches, but that's another story...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vertical at the merge
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A good lookout is imperrative! No matter where you are - low level (<2000`)midweek especially (watch out for the fast movers), but a good listen out and lookout in any airspace is always important. I am not saying sacrifice good flying skills at important stages of flight but like Spacers example, you never know when other aircraft flown by dullards will pitch up right in your HUD. Especially the civvies that think its alright to disregard that MATZ! . .After you have been scared a few times I bet your lookout will be improved exponentially.
Lose sight, lose fight!
Lose sight, lose fight!
Free Man, Not a Number
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Well here of course.
Age: 58
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cranfield is a busy training drome, I've seen a lot of "interesting" things happen but two RT calls come to mind from last summer.
Tower: "G-XX you have been ignoring my calls, permission to land is denied, get out of my circuit"
And whilst being no 1. on hold - a sudden flurry of "extend base", "overhsoot" and me to stop calls as a Cessna popped up over the fence and landed on the active. The tower called G-XX (a known airfield training plane) and asked for the instructor while the C-150 rolled out. "Do you want to tell your pupil what he did wrong or would you like me to?" I'd love ot have heard the rest of the conversation.
Tower: "G-XX you have been ignoring my calls, permission to land is denied, get out of my circuit"
And whilst being no 1. on hold - a sudden flurry of "extend base", "overhsoot" and me to stop calls as a Cessna popped up over the fence and landed on the active. The tower called G-XX (a known airfield training plane) and asked for the instructor while the C-150 rolled out. "Do you want to tell your pupil what he did wrong or would you like me to?" I'd love ot have heard the rest of the conversation.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not strictly on topic, but the mention of your incident happening at Lydd prompts me to comment upon my experience when I flew in there yesterday, and to wonder whether it might not have been a contributing factor.
One of the 'Lydd RADIO' operators yesterday was clearly a frustrated ATCO. In the short time it took for me to join and land yesterday, he gave 2 aircraft taxi INSTRUCTIONS, including hold position etc, and then as I turned final with one on for departure he said to the next one who reported ready: "After the departing aircraft, line up". I then called final (having not been able to get in before) and he told the subject aircraft to hold position. This is a very dangerous practise, in my opinion, and one which has been discussed on these fora many times before. Quite apart from the legality of what this guy is doing, I feel the danger is that the pilots will stop using the airmanship to which this thread refers as the subconciously feel that someone else is doing that for them, when in fact that person is probably not aware of the whole picture and certainly isn't qualified to take on that responsibility.
I am afraid that it is a common problem I experience at some smaller airfields with A/G or AFISO operators. By the way, by the time I departed the voice had changed and it was by the book.
One of the 'Lydd RADIO' operators yesterday was clearly a frustrated ATCO. In the short time it took for me to join and land yesterday, he gave 2 aircraft taxi INSTRUCTIONS, including hold position etc, and then as I turned final with one on for departure he said to the next one who reported ready: "After the departing aircraft, line up". I then called final (having not been able to get in before) and he told the subject aircraft to hold position. This is a very dangerous practise, in my opinion, and one which has been discussed on these fora many times before. Quite apart from the legality of what this guy is doing, I feel the danger is that the pilots will stop using the airmanship to which this thread refers as the subconciously feel that someone else is doing that for them, when in fact that person is probably not aware of the whole picture and certainly isn't qualified to take on that responsibility.
I am afraid that it is a common problem I experience at some smaller airfields with A/G or AFISO operators. By the way, by the time I departed the voice had changed and it was by the book.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my opinion its probably better NOT to have a A/G operator. Its safer to let all pilots converse with each other on the Unicom. Stops all this confusion with pilots taking instructions and A/G operators issuing 'illegal' instructions. The best person for a weather advisory is the last pilot to land.....
Dir. PPRuNe Line Service
It's not just A/G operators that cause the problem. White Waltham is (usually) A/G and they take great care to be by the book.
Occasionally visiting aircraft cause problems by repeatedly asking for landing clearance etc. and can't seem to understand that an A/G station can't do that. Is this caused by the pilot not having read/forgotten CAP413 or is it caused by them in the past being in contact with too many "Heathrow Tower" A/G stations?
--Mik
Occasionally visiting aircraft cause problems by repeatedly asking for landing clearance etc. and can't seem to understand that an A/G station can't do that. Is this caused by the pilot not having read/forgotten CAP413 or is it caused by them in the past being in contact with too many "Heathrow Tower" A/G stations?
--Mik
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
englishal and PPRuNe Dispatcher,
There would be no problem if A/G operators did what they were supposed to do and no more. Why can't they? It's all written down clearly. It's not rocket science, and it's not complicated.
At one point I started training to be an A/G operator at Sleap. The first day the chap who was teaching me was quite specific - never use the word clear, don't say "at your discretion" (only FISOs are supposed to do that, I think), just give runway in use, QFE, QNH, and wind info and similar. If asked for traffic info say something to the effect that there was traffic in the circuit and coming and going and they should keep a good lookout. Not difficult is it?
Right, the second time I had another guy. He cleared people to taxi, asked them to hold, gave them circuit instructions and so on. When I pointed out that this was illegal he just got annoyed; he'd been doing the job for 16 years and wasn't about to change for a new trainee A/G operator. He made me do as he said, but it was the last time. I never went back.
Why is he allowed to carry on? I don't know for sure, and it's another story anyway. But people like that shouldn't be allowed to. Apart from being illegal, they confuse pilots, and that could be dangerous.
There would be no problem if A/G operators did what they were supposed to do and no more. Why can't they? It's all written down clearly. It's not rocket science, and it's not complicated.
At one point I started training to be an A/G operator at Sleap. The first day the chap who was teaching me was quite specific - never use the word clear, don't say "at your discretion" (only FISOs are supposed to do that, I think), just give runway in use, QFE, QNH, and wind info and similar. If asked for traffic info say something to the effect that there was traffic in the circuit and coming and going and they should keep a good lookout. Not difficult is it?
Right, the second time I had another guy. He cleared people to taxi, asked them to hold, gave them circuit instructions and so on. When I pointed out that this was illegal he just got annoyed; he'd been doing the job for 16 years and wasn't about to change for a new trainee A/G operator. He made me do as he said, but it was the last time. I never went back.
Why is he allowed to carry on? I don't know for sure, and it's another story anyway. But people like that shouldn't be allowed to. Apart from being illegal, they confuse pilots, and that could be dangerous.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Gone.........for good this time.
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sennadog,
You keep looking out old chap, then you will spot these idiots long before they crash into you! Unfortunately, many of the flying clubs, schools and pilots of today have never even heard of 'Airmanship', let alone courteous flying! I suspect most of them have been to the school of lifemanship (Terry-Thomas in 'School for Scoundrels'), or failing that, the School of one-upmanship. I think it has something to do with the amount of jet-skiers taking up flying!
On the subject of A/G operators overstepping their authority, if you as the pilot believe a breach of the ANO and Air Traffic Regs has taken place, put in a Mandatory Occurence Report (MOR)to the Safety Information & Data Department at the CAA. If Pilots told somebody who could do something about it rather than just whingeing about it on PPRUNE, then it might prevent an accident. If there was to be a serious accident, which was due to A/G incompetence, then the powers that be may then decide we all need Air Traffic 'Control' and then we would all lose out!
And judging by the amount of Bill & Fred's useless chat on a certain 'unofficial' frequency, 'UNICOM' will never work here.
Rant over for now
[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Zlin526 ]
[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Zlin526 ]</p>
You keep looking out old chap, then you will spot these idiots long before they crash into you! Unfortunately, many of the flying clubs, schools and pilots of today have never even heard of 'Airmanship', let alone courteous flying! I suspect most of them have been to the school of lifemanship (Terry-Thomas in 'School for Scoundrels'), or failing that, the School of one-upmanship. I think it has something to do with the amount of jet-skiers taking up flying!
On the subject of A/G operators overstepping their authority, if you as the pilot believe a breach of the ANO and Air Traffic Regs has taken place, put in a Mandatory Occurence Report (MOR)to the Safety Information & Data Department at the CAA. If Pilots told somebody who could do something about it rather than just whingeing about it on PPRUNE, then it might prevent an accident. If there was to be a serious accident, which was due to A/G incompetence, then the powers that be may then decide we all need Air Traffic 'Control' and then we would all lose out!
And judging by the amount of Bill & Fred's useless chat on a certain 'unofficial' frequency, 'UNICOM' will never work here.
Rant over for now
[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Zlin526 ]
[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Zlin526 ]</p>
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A good A/G is of great benefit. As a frequent visitor to Sleap I've found them very useful in the past and thankfully, I've never had the experience of a bad one. I've personally witnessed two potential accidents where pilots had not seen other aircraft on finals, cut into the circuit and been warned off by A/G. It's not nice to be just on very short finals and to look up to see another aircraft descending onto you from above and behind! Using a common air-air frequency is great providing other aircraft are 1) radio eqipped and 2) listening!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Age: 44
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, at least it seems as though I'm not alone here! I thought that maybe it's because I'm new to flying that I kept more of a look out due to unfamiliarity. It seems that there are just as many muppets in the air as on the Queen's Highway!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Blackbushe
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personaly, I think them whole A/G AFIS situation is pretty screwed up.
There is either an info service or an advice service ( seeing as the pilot is ultimately responsible ).
In the circuit of a lisenced field, If the tower says to do something & if airmanship & the law allows, it should be done. Easy really!...
...or, they tell you the weather & the runway, & for anyhting else, look out of the window!
There is too much of a grey area that we all fall into.
Ultimately, remember that you, as the pilot in charge, are that - the pilot in charge.
Take care!
BtB
There is either an info service or an advice service ( seeing as the pilot is ultimately responsible ).
In the circuit of a lisenced field, If the tower says to do something & if airmanship & the law allows, it should be done. Easy really!...
...or, they tell you the weather & the runway, & for anyhting else, look out of the window!
There is too much of a grey area that we all fall into.
Ultimately, remember that you, as the pilot in charge, are that - the pilot in charge.
Take care!
BtB
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hey guys
Never forget that you as PIC have the ultimate responsibility to keep your a/c and souls on board safe.
This was brought home to me a few years ago when cleared to land by ATC at a regional airfield and encountering traffic flying UP the same glideslope that I was descending!
Fortunately good VMC and a good lookout avoided a bang, but the susbequent airprox investigation was most interesting.
The buck stops in the LHS.
Fly safe....
Never forget that you as PIC have the ultimate responsibility to keep your a/c and souls on board safe.
This was brought home to me a few years ago when cleared to land by ATC at a regional airfield and encountering traffic flying UP the same glideslope that I was descending!
Fortunately good VMC and a good lookout avoided a bang, but the susbequent airprox investigation was most interesting.
The buck stops in the LHS.
Fly safe....
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Final 3 Greens
I think you should read the latest posting on the other <a href="http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=53&t=001300" target="_blank">Airmanship</a> thread.
It's alright saying the ultimate responsibility rests with the PiC, but it would be nice if some were capable of conducting themselves in a manner commensurate with that responsibility!
CM
[ 28 February 2002: Message edited by: Chilli Monster ]</p>
I think you should read the latest posting on the other <a href="http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=53&t=001300" target="_blank">Airmanship</a> thread.
It's alright saying the ultimate responsibility rests with the PiC, but it would be nice if some were capable of conducting themselves in a manner commensurate with that responsibility!
CM
[ 28 February 2002: Message edited by: Chilli Monster ]</p>