Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Biggin Emergency Landing or was it?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Biggin Emergency Landing or was it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2009, 20:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The laughing stock of the rest of the world!
Age: 73
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ammeter wasn't working in another aircraft and there was nothing on the gauge to indicate it wasn't working.
Fuel gauge, left one was showing full while the right was showing between half to 3/4 full and moving between.
Time to name and shame methinks, your club is obviously not keeping their aircraft maintained properly.
Lightning6 is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2009, 21:26
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The crest was just ahead of us, I think he waited untill speed dropped and then thought best bring it down here rather than hitting the crest at some speed.

I don't want to mention the company incase I cause some hassle just yet though anyone with a knowledge of biggin hill and the gps position in the my first post will have a good idea who it is.

Donalk- Your post is well written and makes good points. Thanks
akzah is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2009, 22:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But if one only believes them when they agree with other sources one is not using them at all. They are there for a purpose
Yes indeed, if the gauges disagree with what I see when I look into the tanks I will consider rejecting the aircraft - what it means beyond that is a matter for the owner's engineer.
Once you are in the air the only means you have to monitor your fuel is the gauge.
Yes indeed, however I was under the impression that the main point under discussion was whether to take off or not.

After all of which ... one of the aircraft I fly has one gauge which occasionally flicks down to zero for a while, giving rise to a spurious low fuel light, then after a while it flicks back up to where it should be. I'm confortable flying this aircraft in this condition.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 05:01
  #24 (permalink)  
Daifly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can imagine it's probably offputting to have a quick return on your second flight, but I wouldn't let it put you off if you can help it as it's a fantastic hobby (or way of life!)

My question is I guess that you've been over it with the instructor concerned and maybe his CFI? My reason being that you're asking people on here (when you really don't know what their own background is) for opinions on what happened when a) none of us bar you were there and b) you don't really seem to know many of the facts that you would do if you'd discussed it with the instructor. Lots of your comments are about you seeing things (85 knots) or you knowing where he put it down ("before the crest") etc - I'm sure he'd happily discuss what and how he did what he did with you.

If he doesn't then you need to find yourself a new instructor anyway!

But don't give up, a good landing is after all one that you walk away from!
 
Old 10th Aug 2009, 06:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, because a fuel gauge is a required instrument for VFR flight. It therefore cannot be placarded as inop and the aircraft legally flown.
You can't say something like that without specifying under what regulations that is true. FAR 91 is a US-only regulation.
bjornhall is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 08:01
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My question is I guess that you've been over it with the instructor concerned and maybe his CFI? My reason being that you're asking people on here (when you really don't know what their own background is) for opinions on what happened when a) none of us bar you were there and b) you don't really seem to know many of the facts that you would do if you'd discussed it with the instructor. Lots of your comments are about you seeing things (85 knots) or you knowing where he put it down ("before the crest") etc - I'm sure he'd happily discuss what and how he did what he did with you.
True maybe he did need to discuss it more with me. I think there was a bit drama of the fire engines and airport authorities and flight school needing to call ATC etc and some paper work to be done first which took priority.

While we didn't have a full debrief, he did say this was the first time in 1500 hours as a CFI that there was anything like this and that this was rare and not to put me off flying etc.. and also that it was probally rough running.
akzah is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 09:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near EGKB
Age: 41
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Runway 29 not only has the dip in the middle, but also lots of trees, 'ploughed' earth, a road, and fence just before the threshold. I'd certainly come in high under the circumstances to make sure I had height enough to avoid all the obsticals should the engine cut on the approach, if too high on 29 i'd turn right and land on a taxiway or on the grass.

Re emergency services, as said by someone here already. They don't have much to do, and hell yeah I'd be out there straight away to see what's up.

As this is your second hour, I'd doubt you were actually in the know with regard to ammeter, and fuel gauges. I fly a tomahawk who's fuel gauges aren't great in the climb-out but are fine in level flight. Certainly a visual check or dip check on the tanks before flight MUST be performed and checked with the gauges so you have an idea of the fuel onboard.

Don't get disheartened, your instructor sounds like he did a bloody good job. And you got a lesson on EFATO very early on
Rodent1982 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 12:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you were really high, the instructor might have use a maneuver called a "sideslip" to increase the drag of the aircraft, thus losing altitude without gaining speed. With a sideslip you're flying more or less sideways through the air so the air doesn't flow along the fuselage, but against it.

But a serious sideslip screws up a lot of cockpit indications temporarily. Fuel gauges, airspeed, altitude and maybe a few others. All depending on the exact configuration of the fuel gauge sender, location of pitot tube, static ports and so forth. We normally don't notice this because in a sideslip you should be looking outside.

Best to ask the instructor what he did exactly, and raise your concerns with him. In fact, if this is a half-decent flight school I think you should be able to phone them up, confess that the whole situation frightened you a bit and ask if you can have a further chat with the instructor about it, on the ground, for free. He is in the best position to answer all your questions and give you the confidence to continue your training.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 22:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long White Cloud
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A phrase I learned a while ago is Fuel gauges are there to show you have gauges, not how much fuel you might have. Better off relying on calculations, so long as your arithmetic is any good.
OA32 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 22:25
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The laughing stock of the rest of the world!
Age: 73
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OA32
A phrase I learned a while ago is Fuel gauges are there to show you have gauges, not how much fuel you might have. Better off relying on calculations, so long as your arithmetic is any good.
And you haven't developed a leak!!
Lightning6 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 12:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And you haven't developed a leak!!
What, like the Atlantic Glider?
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Somerset
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fear Factor ?

Akzah,

I have to agree with Gertrude . . don't trust the guages . . dip the tanks. You can get some lovely dippy tube things from most suppliers of pilots' bag ballast e.g. Transair.

The other thing you might consider is do a bit of gliding as well. Although the characteristics are very different to something like a Cessna, having to get the landing right without an engine doesn't half reduce the pucker factor !

All the best with your training.

Nickh
Nickh2203 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 10:23
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the world
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As we left the runway I could see the fire brigade and other airport vehicles coming across to us. Instructor told them it wasn't an emergency and that during his first call he said it wasn't an emergency, I had heard this but people on the ground said there was some crackling.
Your right, your instructor did say it wasn't an emergency on the RTF however, this was an emergency whether he thought it was or not and this was confirmed when your instructor rejected the left base join for RWY21 and landed on RWY29. The approach controller immediately took the appropriate emergency action when your instructor first reported the engine malfunction.

Your flight was awarded category A priority (as defined by the CAA) which is given to all aircraft in an emergency (engine fault) and other aircraft were moved out of the way accordingly.
Dizzee Rascal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.