Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

What Microlight?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

What Microlight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 13:47
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: dublin
Age: 57
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have a look at the Roko Aero NG4 nice machine
EI-BNC is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 16:27
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: What day is it?
Age: 72
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynamic WT9

If I could add my 2pence worth.

Flown about 60 hours in an 912 80HP fixed gear Dynamic. Great plane. High price here in the UK and restricted to 450kgs to get it into our microlight bracket. With this weight restriction on say a 255kg empty airplane with two 90kg lard ar$$es in it, this leaves only 15kg for fuel etc ..legally.

If you don't have these restrictions and the price in your neck of the woods is reasonable then it's a good choice.

Can be tricky to land consistently as it refuses to stop flying if you have any excess speed. Apart from that, a pleasure to fly.

Can't compare with the others mentioned as I don't have any experience on them.

If you are buying in the UK, check who the importer is, these days. Heard a rumour that there were some changes in that area.

Regards
OyYou is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2009, 07:42
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which is the more robust for training a C42 or Eurostar? and which is the cheaper to operate based on 200 hours per year?
Mickey Kaye is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2009, 20:31
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Basingstoke
Age: 48
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say the C42 is more robust for training, as evidenced by the fact that just about every 3 axis microlight school uses it.

The Eurostar can certainly be used for training and several schools do, but the low wing and thus the access via the wing, the perspex canopy etc... mean that it is likely to get shabby quicker than a C42.

As for operating costs I doubt there's anything in it as they both use the same 80 hp Rotax, same fuel burn/maintenance etc...
XXPLOD is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2009, 06:32
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A small indication of the UK microlight fraternity achievements in the World Air Games in Turin.

BMAA

09-Jun-2009 - World Air Games - British Champions

Four UK Pilots have won the microlight - flexwing title at the 2009 World Air Games in Italy today. Team Rob Grimwood and Chris Saysell took the first place with Rob and Rees Keene taking second. Less than a second separated the two aircraft in the pylon racing event. The nearest rivals came over twenty seconds behind, well trounced. 09-06-2009

Well done chaps.
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2009, 10:05
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK & France
Posts: 40
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to thank all those who have contributed information/impressions to this thread.

It has proved to be most interesting and helpful. Well done, guys!
lastgasp is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2009, 12:20
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as a by the by.

Rob Grimwood flys the eurostar (ev-97) at his flight school. Another thought is size of pilot as if you are short in the legs ( cannot reach the rudders) the eurostar rudders cannot easily be adjusted.
wacits is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2009, 11:52
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CZ
Age: 49
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
few comments:
Eurostar and Sportcruiser are sharing just the same airport (LKKU) where they are getting born. Different company, different people.
Having 200+ hours on EV-97 Eurostar (mainly cross-country including ferry flight to UK ;-) ) I can definitely recommend this as easy and nice to fly while providing good performance figures. I am not (and I was not) a sales person for Eurostars, that´s my opinion.
Don´t go for Roko NG4 - they are currently only 20+ of them build and you know "never fly A-model of anything". They have excellent marketing but the aircraft is still too new.
No experience on Dynamic or C-42 to be hones.
bubo is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 15:54
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: England
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's happening with the Dynamic in the UK, the importer company is listed as "proposed to be struck off" the companies house register? Is someone else going to take up importing these?
Reg-e is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 16:31
  #50 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Reg-e
What's happening with the Dynamic in the UK, the importer company is listed as "proposed to be struck off" the companies house register? Is someone else going to take up importing these?
I'd not heard anything, but if YLAC folds they are owners of various agreements with the CAA to allow import (or more to the point, issue of a UK Type Approved Permit to Fly), and those agreements which are built upon some incredibly expensive work by them will be the main asset of the company.

Another company could take this on, and that would certainly be a good thing, but I'm willing to bet that if YLAC do fold, whoever holds the assets will want a fair lump of money for ownership of those agreements.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 18:27
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone needs to be very clear, YLAC are classed by the CAA as the manufacturer, not the importer/distributor, of the WT9 Dynamic. No YLAC, no new Dynamics. Aerospool are simply classed as the sub-contract company making the things, they do not own the rights to the UK derivative. If YLAC did cease to exist, whether the owner would be willing to pass on all the docs needed for someone else to take over is, as indicated by previous post, moot point!
dstevens is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 20:51
  #52 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by dstevens
Everyone needs to be very clear, YLAC are classed by the CAA as the manufacturer, not the importer/distributor, of the WT9 Dynamic. No YLAC, no new Dynamics. Aerospool are simply classed as the sub-contract company making the things, they do not own the rights to the UK derivative. If YLAC did cease to exist, whether the owner would be willing to pass on all the docs needed for someone else to take over is, as indicated by previous post, moot point!
I'm sure they would, but certainly not for free. I was involved on the fringes of that certification project - it was huge, expensive, and the bill must have been well over £100k; also the UK version Dynamic is not the same aircraft sold in other countries. That "manufacturer status" is the company's primary asset.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 00:32
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Age: 48
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As YLAC's CEO and 75% shareholder, I can clear up any misunderstanding here.

We are listed as "proposal to be struck off" on Companies House website only because our accounts were overdue. They have been completed now, and the website will be changed within the next few days.

YLAC is not going to fold - on the contrary, we are well capitalised and currently sales are going very well. Even if we were (and, I repeat, we are NOT!), there are no circumstances upon which it could appear on Companies House website - they are just a bunch of civil servants who give you a hard time if your accounts and/or annual return are late.

Genghis - try around £300k for the bill for Type + Company Approvals (split ca. 80:20 between the two)! But thanks to your early support - and that of a group of other talented professionals - we achieved our goal and crossed the finish line.

Certification is long, long, long, long process. Luckily I was only 27 when I co-founded YLAC so had youth on my side (and hair then)!

Hope this helps. Safe and happy flying to all!

Nick

PS YLAC now on Twitter - check out www.twitter.com/yeomanlightair
nick.marley is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 08:00
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roko Aero

It would be if it had a permit and was flying
renrut is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 08:59
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Received 21 Likes on 9 Posts
Dynamic

Am I the only one to note that Reg-e's first post is one making negative comments about another company, and to wonder what his/her agenda might be?
KeyPilot is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 10:17
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: England
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just want to know if this rather nice machine is going to continue to be available here in the UK.
Reg-e is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 11:17
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Age: 48
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reg-e,

It is - check out my post above (which has only appeared some time after it was posted, as I am a mere "probabtionary ppruner")

Thanks,
Nick
nick.marley is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 11:31
  #58 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by nick.marley
Reg-e,

It is - check out my post above (which has only appeared some time after it was posted, as I am a mere "probabtionary ppruner")

Thanks,
Nick
I can't remember the number, but any new member's first few posts are delayed and moderated - it's a facility built into the website to fend of spam and flame-wars (and a large number of same do get trapped by the system).

Do a bit more posting, and the probationary bit will vanish.

I can't say I'm overly surprised by your £300k+ bill, it was clear at the start that it wasn't going to be a quick and easy job, for a whole stack of reasons. However, I continue to be impressed that you made it through and hope you keep going for a fair while yet.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 13:44
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Age: 48
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info - and kind words - Genghis.

I would like to say the success was all down to my first-class project management skills, but I'd be lying through my teeth! It was purely and simply through being a tenacious Scouser (accent long since faded but spirit remaining) and refusing ever even to countenance defeat. Remember, the only team ever to have come back from 3-0 down to win the UEFA Champions League is Liverpool.

It is that spirit which got us through. Many said we couldn't do it, we proved them wrong.
nick.marley is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 20:48
  #60 (permalink)  
Oh Shazbat!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Leeds, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to say the success was all down to my first-class project management skills, but I'd be lying through my teeth!
You got through didn't you? That makes the PM skills better than a lot of projects. Next time, I'd suggest you say that you had been using Agile Methods (see here)
batninth is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.