Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Diamond forced landing/engine failure Norway

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Diamond forced landing/engine failure Norway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 16:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Diamond forced landing/engine failure Norway



Småfly nødlandet på islagt vann - nyheter - Dagbladet.no

Engine failure over wooded area to the east of Oslo. 2 POB taken to hospital for checkup.

Looks like Oslo Flying clubs LN-NEX DA40





M609 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2009, 17:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norway/Oslo + Larnaca (formerly Riga)
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another reason not to fly anything with a Thielert engine.

LN-NEX had an emergency landing at ENRY following an engine breakup(!) only a few years ago. Several DA-40's have been forced down due to engine problems during the last few years.
TuckUnder77 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 09:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Neat, a flying club on snow!
Katamarino is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 12:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gt. Yarmouth, Norfolk
Age: 68
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another reason not to fly anything with a Thielert engine.
A bit of a sweeping statement given that the cause of this crash is not known yet! Yes, there have been a number of issues with diesel powered aircraft in general, but would be interested to know what the failure rate per 1000 hours is compared with the Avgas fleet. Does anyone know?
Justiciar is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 12:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
God - how did they get out? with the a/c upside-down, I can't see how the clam-shell door would have lifted?
wsmempson is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 12:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't see how the clam-shell door would have lifted?
The rear door normally swings upwards but has an emergency release that pulls the pin out of the hinges (or something to that effect), allowing the door to slide/swing out sideways.

The pictures were taken from the wrong side of the aircraft to see this, but that's what I'd do to get out in this situation.

Oddly enough, this is not mentioned in the POH at all. At least not in the PDF version that I'm using.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 13:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done to the occupants for remembering how to pull the pin on the hinge for the back door. Upside-down, in a stream, after a forced landing - that show presence of mind!
wsmempson is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 17:26
  #8 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it shows that their training worked myself.....
englishal is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 18:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the engine and possible failure, there does appear to be a lot of black oily stuff on the port leading edge that pehaps isn't normally there...
smarthawke is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 13:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norway/Oslo + Larnaca (formerly Riga)
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly the same oil spillage on the belly as when the A/C landed at ENRY after the engine breakup...

As far as I've been informed, the occupants did not make their way out through the aft canopy; rather they were saved by pure luck and an escape hole in the front canopy. Not visible in any of the images here, though.

Great to know that the occupants were not injured, but taken into account the amount of engine-related problems on these aircraft, it's time to put them on the ground until further investigations have been completed. Something stinks.
TuckUnder77 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 16:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chessington
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Conspicuity stripes

When we did the Spitzbergen trip three years ago, GG-33s Bonanza (single) had to have orange "invasion stripes" put on the wings for our passage through Norway. These were to aid search, and rescue in the event of a downed aircraft. I see that this aircraft does not have such wing stripes, and it is easy to see how a white aircraft could disappear after a forced landing in such a snowy environment.

The real Iceman
The real Iceman is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 17:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Aberdeen, NE Scotland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Classic forced landing

Note how the pilot kept the nose wheel off the snow, presumably until elevator authority was lost at ??kts. Nosed over 50-80ft after the nose wheel touched down. Nice one!
C-dog is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 19:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Real Iceman"
I see that this aircraft does not have such wing stripes
They are fitted as standard with an ELB, which is probably more useful for S&R.
soay is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 19:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Norway
Age: 54
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
had to have orange "invasion stripes" put on the wings for our passage through Norway
This is only required in certain remote areas, eg. Svalbard. See

http://www.caa.no/multimedia/archive...uide_2866a.pdf
rebra is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 20:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chessington
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That explains the stripes then. Our destination was Svalbard.

The real Iceman
The real Iceman is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 21:34
  #16 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A bit of a sweeping statement given that the cause of this crash is not known yet!
Flyet hadde fått motortrøbbel,
The aircraft had had (got) engine trouble . . .

men klarte å nødlande.
but managed to emergency land.

de har foretatt en vellykket nødlanding,
they had carried out a very lucky emergency landing

Det var to personer om bord. Én flyintruktør og en elev,
There were two persons onboard. A flying instructor and a pupil.

På tilbaketuren mot Kjeller fikk de motorproblemer og måtte nødlande
On the return trip towards Kjeller the engine had problems and they had to (make an) emergency landing.

Begge som var ombord er i god behold.
Both of those onboard are in good 'condition' (ie health / state)

Sorry, literal translation only - my other language is Danish (and unused since 1985) - not Norwegian!


Alarmen på Hovedredningssentralen på Sola gikk like før halv ett
The alarm at the main rescue centre at Sola was raised just before 12.30 and the rescue team found the small aircraft at 13.05.
Klokka 13.05 fant redningsmannskapene småfly
Ingen ble alvorlig skadd
No-one was seriously injured (damaged)
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 22:58
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
de har foretatt en vellykket nødlanding,
they had carried out a very lucky emergency landing
Not to bore non Scandinavians with details but the correct translation is:

....very successful emergency landing.... (And indeed it was given the ground conditions)

"Vellykket" does not imply luck or fortunate circumstances
M609 is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 11:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there any accessible data on the engine failure rates of Thielert diesels as compared to Lycoming engines? Preferably broken down on technical and non-technical reasons?

The feeling one gets is that with a Thielert engine, "running" is but a temporary state in preparation for the next engine failure. Until there is data that proves otherwise, I'd be quite hesitant to fly one...
bjornhall is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 14:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once again, the "plastic fuselage" shown useful. Diamond can continue to say that none of their aircraft were broken after crash. Even the seats are integral part of the fuselage (that's why the rudder pedals have to be adjusted, and not the seats).

This is good after accident, as it reduces the risk of fire (less fuel spillage) and of shock for the occupants. No comments regarding the engine at this time.
PlasticPilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.