Does this mean "mode-s" ?
Pompey till I die
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guildford
Age: 51
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does this mean "mode-s" ?
European Mode S Carriage Requirements | Mode S | Airspace Policy
he Belgian regulator has stated that for VFR Flights, conducted in airpsace where currently the carriage and operation of SSR transponders is mandatory:
he Belgian regulator has stated that for VFR Flights, conducted in airpsace where currently the carriage and operation of SSR transponders is mandatory:
- A level 2 transponder is needed with Elementary Surveillance (including SI-code) functionality, as a minimum, compliant with ICAO Annex 10 Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS) with effect from 1 January 2011.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere in Europe
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a bit of a faff last year trying to clarify the situation with Belgium with their own authorities! In the end the conclusion was - as applied to this question here - yes: you will need Mode S if you fly in airspace currently requiring SSR. More simply put, if you intend to fly in a Transponder Mandatory Zone (TMZ) you will need Mode S. The answer is to avoid the TMZs, providing that is an option in destination/routeing terms, and continue flying without Mode S. Standing by to be shot down by more rule changes which have been buried away by another Himalayan-sized range of mountains....!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The answer is to avoid the TMZs, providing that is an option in destination/routeing terms, and continue flying without Mode S.
Unfortunately our airspace is quite congested so avoiding TMZ's is sometimes not a viable option. Some of the schools here are cringing at the prospect of having to pour more scarce cash into ageing spam cans. Whats next - cvr's and cdr's??
Unfortunately our airspace is quite congested so avoiding TMZ's is sometimes not a viable option. Some of the schools here are cringing at the prospect of having to pour more scarce cash into ageing spam cans. Whats next - cvr's and cdr's??
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats next - cvr's and cdr's??
On mainland Europe flying about without mode-S and without an ELT, while staying on the right side of the law, will become an increasingly difficult exercise in flight planning.
I thought one of the benefits of Mode-S was that we should not have to use transponder codes any more, as each aircraft could have its own unique code permanently assigned. So why are we still flying around squawking this and that in our Mode-S aircraft?
It seems to me that, as used by ATC today, Mode-S offers absolutely no advantage over Mode-C to us GA pilots - am I missing something?
It seems to me that, as used by ATC today, Mode-S offers absolutely no advantage over Mode-C to us GA pilots - am I missing something?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
“It seems to me that, as used by ATC today, Mode-S offers absolutely no advantage over Mode-C to us GA pilots - am I missing something?”
There are only 2 radars in the UK providing “Mode S” ident (although the feeds go to more than two ATC units). There are no plans to update most of the radars according to local military and civilian controllers in my area. Right now there is no VFR pilot benefit in the UK of Mode C over Mode S, and the only issue is the international situation which appears to be mostly ok depending on which arrears you look at. With Mode s units dropping in price, and possibly starting to be replaced in the US, giving us second hand units, the cost of fit is likely to continue to drop.
Life for non mode C may start to get difficult depending on the TMZ consultations, but that is another issue.
Rod1
There are only 2 radars in the UK providing “Mode S” ident (although the feeds go to more than two ATC units). There are no plans to update most of the radars according to local military and civilian controllers in my area. Right now there is no VFR pilot benefit in the UK of Mode C over Mode S, and the only issue is the international situation which appears to be mostly ok depending on which arrears you look at. With Mode s units dropping in price, and possibly starting to be replaced in the US, giving us second hand units, the cost of fit is likely to continue to drop.
Life for non mode C may start to get difficult depending on the TMZ consultations, but that is another issue.
Rod1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All radars in the Netherlands have been upgraded to process the Mode-S signals and the Mode-S ID will be displayed on all radar screens.
In fact, you can expect a significant amount of hassle from ATC if your Mode-S transponder transmits a wrong ID. And yes, transits through controlled airspace are now routinely done on a squawk of 7000 instead of something specific - after ATC has validated your callsign, position and altitude with the mode-S readout.
In fact, you can expect a significant amount of hassle from ATC if your Mode-S transponder transmits a wrong ID. And yes, transits through controlled airspace are now routinely done on a squawk of 7000 instead of something specific - after ATC has validated your callsign, position and altitude with the mode-S readout.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mode-S elementary (i.e. what we use) offers very little observable benefit to anyone vs. Mode C.
There is fact that Mode-S transponders reply less frequently than Mode -A/C when interrogated by an ACAS system or by compatible ground radar. This has reduces the RF traffic on the transponder frequency, and has a potential benefit that the level of interference on the transponder frequency would become a problem with the increasing use of transponders and ACAS.
There are some potential benefits (over the horizon at the moment) like replacing the squawk code with the aircraft identifier (helping to relieve the European shortage of codes) and support for ADS-B.
In the LTMA they have a nice tool to show the vertical profile of a stack (who is where) in addition to the traditional overlay of all of the targets in the stack painted on top of each other. It maybe Mode-S elementary transponders work in this environment (but it is unlikely that a PA28R is going to be in the LAM Stack!)
Mode-S enhanced does offer some advantages to ATC to help avoid level busts and communication errors (like a different speed or heading being selected vs cleared)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South of UK
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mode S
There are only 2 radars in the UK providing “Mode S” ident (although the feeds go to more than two ATC units).
There are no plans to update most of the radars according to local military and civilian controllers in my area
I thought one of the benefits of Mode-S was that we should not have to use transponder codes any more, as each aircraft could have its own unique code permanently assigned. So why are we still flying around squawking this and that in our Mode-S aircraft?
From an interoperability point of view the sooner everyone is using the Mode S the better - but I can understand the point of view of a GA operator having to upgrade a transponder with no immediate obvious benefit.
RS
