Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Blocked Runway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th March 2009 | 23:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
You are lucky to have a gate: our strip is completely open to the countryside and unsecurable.

Despite 3 foot high signs in Red/White on two Hangars declaring 'Danger Active airstrip Keep Off', the entire world and his brother treats it as open pasture, ignoring the fact that it is in the middle of private farmland.

Cusco.
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 02:05
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
I'm thinking an A10 "tank-buster" would be an ideal mount for a bit of strip flying. Better check the GAU cannon is fully loaded first. I'd hate to be dissapointed.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 08:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
We're thinking of inviting the Apaches from nearby RAF Wattisham to carry out a few day and night exercises over the strip.

A laser aiming beam from an Apache onto the midnight boy-racers' Astras as they carve up the strip doing donuts and handbrake turns might have a sobering effect.....

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 09:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: France
Bazookas, barbed wire, lasers, killer robots... You are all out of order.

Farmstrips are used 99% of the time for walking dogs and just 1% of the time for aviation. Remember that even on foggy, rainy days the dogs are still there. To the people in the area it is the aircraft that are unwelcome guests and not the other way around.

They also don't appreciate the dangers, but this is not their fault. I am sure that if the pilots of Pprune went to a gun club the members would shake their heads at the dangerous things they'd do.

There is only one solution that works: engaging with the local community. Go out to the field yourself one day and chat with the dog owners. Tell them that they are welcome to walk their dogs there but whenever they see an aircraft approaching they should leave the field, restrain their animals until the engine is switched off and never turn their back on the air traffic.
deltayankee is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 10:16
  #25 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
You didn't Buzz them...you were making a normal approach to land but had to Go Around due to blocked runway
englishal is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 11:46
  #26 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
Pah!! I'll get those darn pesky ground dwelling peasants out of my way once and for all, shoot them all slowly Jeeves.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 14:42
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Oxford, UK
It is only good manners to phone ahead for prior permission.

It is only self-preservation to have enough fuel to go elsewhere; did you plan to refuel at this farm strip?

I'm wondering what you were flying at the time.

Glider pilots, before going cross country, must understand how to select a safe landing field. In addition to Size, Slope and Surface, we must look out for animals, and cricket players. If a field is cluttered with dogs, people, horses, you must go elsewhere.
mary meagher is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 19:01
  #28 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 208
From: Toronto
SSSLOW for Outlandings

Slope, Surface, Stock, Length, Obstacles, Wind is the checklist.

Of course in a glider, go-arounds are not an option, but glider pilots at busy clubs get lots of practice slotting landings around other gliders and retrieve vehicles, and trying to avoid obstructing the glider behind. It does help to have a 50 yard landing roll

My favorite outlanding field is bare and regularly cultivated -- decent surface, no stock, rocks generally removed, not much crop to damage or cause a groundloop, unattractive to strollers and animals.

Even better is a strip where the towplane can come get me. A few strollers and/or animals in one spot a glider can work around, but a crowd is a different matter.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 19:06
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
Thread drift has rather missed the point: The original poster relates to problems at an established airstrip where aeroplanes might reasonably be expected to land, not a ruddy great field miles from anywhere that gliders tend to plonk in out of a choice of dozens of such fields .

There is a bit of a difference.

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 20:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Oxford, UK
blocked airstrip

Thanks, Cusco. There is a difference between a ruddy big field and a
farm airstrip. Usually a farm strip is narrow, short, and has tall trees at one end and power lines at the other! To have locals walking their dogs is the last straw, but unfortunately it happens.

If the strip is sufficiently popular and has enough traffic that aeroplanes might reasonably be expected to land from time to time, it should be signposted by the owner/farmer to warn the public, and have a nice unobstructed windsock in the middle.

Otherwise we must give way to those who do not appreciate the requirements of air traffic.

There are worse things than landing in a ruddy big field.
mary meagher is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 20:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 36
From: France
but you can dump water ballast!
or finely divided sand, as in "not still in the bag"




applies mainly to gas balloons, but hey, let's get creative!
Piper.Classique is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 22:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
If the strip is sufficiently popular and has enough traffic that aeroplanes might reasonably be expected to land from time to time, it should be signposted by the owner/farmer to warn the public, and have a nice unobstructed windsock in the middle.
MM you've exactly described our strip:

Except no power lines and no trees: it's wide and long with clear approaches for miles.

It is barn door obvious that a/c fly from there as they indeed have done since 1974.

That doesn't stop the locals walking their dogs, riding their horses, flying their kites and even turning up in 4 x 4s for a shoot (yes, really).

A fair bit of afterdark Astra donutting , boozing and not a little sh*gging as evidenced by the cans bottles and rubberware left lying about.

Short of having armed watchtowers there's s*d all we can do about it:

Go some where else to land? Get real, my car's in the hangar..............

You can bet your sweet bippy I will land there eventually.

Not had to divert yet. Like I and others have said above, a (legal) baulked landing as the Yanks call it does the trick.

(Day only of course, what they do after dark is not relevant: a strip run in the morning before take off sorts out the previous night's detritus)

Yeuch: but somebody's got to do it.

And there's always Article 73 of the ANO.

Cusco

Last edited by Cusco; 12th March 2009 at 23:23.
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2009 | 22:40
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
Certainly - nowhere was it mentioned to be an established airstrip as Cusco suggests.
If it's a private strip I would venture to suggest it's established.

Or are you suggesting private strips pop up overnight, operate for a few days then disappear as quickly as they came?

I agree it's a shame hatzflyer hasn't bothered to return as, amongst all the thread drift all his questions have been answered more than adequately.

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 08:54
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Niort
To you and I 'an established strip' is fairly obvious. To Joe Public it simply isn't. That is the point we have to understand.

That big strip of mown grass, the windsock, the hangar - they don't mean anything to the average dog walker. In most cases they will not have seen an aircraft on the strip, if they have seen an aircraft in the vicinity they will not have linked it to that long strip of mown grass - aircraft do not land in fields is the usual response.

I've operated several strips and it frustrates me that pilots can be so stupid and arrogant when it comes to not seeing the viewpoint of the 'general public'. If you talk to them they are ALL surprised that it is possible to land in a field, legal to land in a field and that the police do not stop us landing in fields, thta we do not need permission from 'air traffic control' to land in fields.

That is why so many strips have all sorts of restrictions, why PPR is so necessary. The trouble that the original poster - and many others in this thread - can cause the strip operator is almost limitless.

That is why at my last strip we would only accept visits from people we knew well and why many of those we knew and all we did not, were simply not allowed.
gasax is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 09:27
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: France
if they have seen an aircraft in the vicinity they will not have linked it to that long strip of mown grass - aircraft do not land in fields is the usual response
Mr Gasax speaks wisely. To the average joe an aircraft is a big thing with Ryanair painted on the side. Once when I told someone I had bought an airplane she asked "Do you have hosties?" and "What kind of food do they serve?"

Even if people are vaguely aware that there might be smaller ones very few can believe that they can actually land on grass and without a control tower. It's not their fault. They don't know about aviation. I don't know about hunting. Maybe you know nothing about stamp collecting. It's not against the law.
deltayankee is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 09:51
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: suffolk
It is an established strip.
There is no ppr.
There is no phone at the strip.
There was no-one else on the ground (to shoo them away).
Whats the point of phoning before departure? The walkers won't be there then!
Can't legally use my mobile when airbourne.(No one to phone anyway).
I had enough fuel to reach an alternative in Germany if need be.
(I didn't SAY I was low on fuel) but A/C do develop problems.
I can't speak to them because I would have to BL$$DY land !!!
hatzflyer is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 10:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Oxford, UK
Cusco; returning to your home strip, with your car in the hangar, suggests you know the local hazards and presumably are on friendly terms with the villagers?! So a "balked landing" may suffice to call attention to your intentions.

Strangers using your strip, without PP, should be less assured of a welcome.

Only one thing worries me, though, safetywise: that compulsion to get back to your car.. . . . . .
mary meagher is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 10:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
Without wishing to prolong the agony of this thread: MM, Yes I do know the locals as we have a 20 year lease on the strip from the farmer.The strip is actually a long way from any habitation, situated as it is in the middle of a disused WW2 airfield long since returned to farmland.

It is clearly a strip as seen from the ground: there are hangars with big red warning notices (see earlier posts) and a windsock.

We do not encourage visitors by air and there are no markings on the ground to identify it as a strip from the air for this reason. We are strictly PPR for a good reason: 20 years ago an illegal para outfit arrived and caused great hassle with the locals before they were ejected: we now have a strict PPR briefing for visitors with charts showing noise sensitive areas which are emailed to anybody wishing to fly in.

Obviously my wish to return to my car would not cloud my judgement on safety grounds: I do hope you're not suggesting it would. Clearly if I returned to find a tent pitched in the middle I would go elsewhere.

I don't visit PPRuNe very often as sooner or later personal attack creeps in: 'arrogant' has already been mentioned in this thread.

The users of our strip are all well aware that its active - they are largely locals: (its well off the beaten track out of sight of 'passing trade') and will respond to an overhead join (not below 500ft), a change in engine note , a landing light and a dropping of the gear.

The go-around is a final but rarely used completely legal option.

Out

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 13:57
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: suffolk
Slight thread drift but relevant to my original post with the giro incident.
Many horsey types have posted about aircraft scaring horses on the hunt,but they are quite happy to canter up my runway, double standards???
hatzflyer is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2009 | 16:33
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk UK
I remember doing my tailwheel conversion at Clacton,and there is a footpath across the runway!
Most of the locals seemed to respect the fact that aircraft were operating,but the odd one seemed to be totally unaware of what was going on.
I fly from a grass strip and we have a "neighbours day" when we entertain,feed and take them flying.
It does help a lot with local relations.
Lister
Lister Noble is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.