Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Fis/basic - ATSOCAS Changes - 12th March

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Fis/basic - ATSOCAS Changes - 12th March

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2009, 12:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bisley
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Only a BS "Basic Service" will be provided by both London and Scottish information as A TS "traffic Service" is a radar based service"

Scottish Information is often provided by their airways controllers. London Info is always provided by Area FISOs......hence the difference.
SwanFIS is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2009, 13:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a thriving maritime community
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where I would have asked for a RAS, I will ask for a Deconfliction Service. The level of service provided will be subject to controller workload.
You can now ask for a DS even if VFR, while the RAS is restricted to IFR only.

Other than that, I don't see many substantial differences.

I think there will be more emphasis on the "take your own terrain clearance" bit even for Traffic Service (althought the pilot is entirely responsible for terrain clearance with a RIS, unless on vectors).

Once again, we're spelling out rules that already exist. It's a bit like now, issuing a VFR clearance, the controller needed to remind you "Remain clear of cloud and with the surface in sight".

We probably wouldn't have had these changes if it wasn't for the Ben Macdui crash, no surprise all over the new ATSOCAS it's branded a "joint civil and military initiative".
Ivor_Novello is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2009, 21:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scottish Info have been able to provide RIS in the past, so presumably will be able to provide a TS in the future.


Not on 119.875mhz they have not...this frequency is a non radar based FIS only service...as SWANFIS says other Scottish sectors at times will provide a RIS/TS also using the callsign Scottish information.....see "UK Air Pilot" for designated areas.
fisbangwollop is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 19:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 71
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the "agreement" thing does it mean if I say I am maintaining 3000 feet I have to ask permission to fly at another level?
DavidHoul52 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 19:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If yoiu say you are maintaining 3000 feet ...

That is what other aircraft will be told, and (hopefully) they will all then be part of a coordinated plan to miss you.

If you decide to fly at a different level without telling anybody you could mess up that plan.
Rightbase is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 19:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus 38: Deconfliction service will only be provided by a surveillance (radar) unit above their ATC terrain safe altitude. If you are below that level you won't get DS.
octavian is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 20:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: An island somewhere
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus 38: Deconfliction service will only be provided by a surveillance (radar) unit above their ATC terrain safe altitude. If you are below that level you won't get DS.
Airbus38 was talking about changes and differences. Your observation is equally true of RAS, i.e no change!
Islander2 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 20:18
  #28 (permalink)  
Upto The Buffers
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Leeds/Bradford
Age: 48
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the changes are positive overall. That said, the traditional services are not hard to grasp yet it's scary how many people don't, won't or can't understand what they're entitled to and that what they might be additionally receiving is a bonus because the controller has the grace and capacity to provide it.

Providing services with more obvious titles is progress, but the stupid and ignorant will still be stupid and ignorant.
Shunter is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 20:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote

If anybody can see any startling changes that will make my attitude towards the change fundamentally dangerous, can they let me know?

Time may tell what effect the changes will have. It probably won't be to the detriment of those in high office places. It probably won't be to the advantage of those on the front line, so let us all be careful out there.
octavian is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2009, 20:28
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 71
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you decide to fly at a different level without telling anybody you could mess up that plan.
Sorry .. it was a dumb question Now I have watched the CD it doesn't seem like much has changed beyond now having to ask for a "Basic Service" rather than FIS. Presumably not using the word "maintain" does not imply an agreement.

Overheard on Saturday

ATC: What is your estimate for X?
Aircraft: er...um.. er....
(Break in transmission. Long pause)
Aircraft: I don't know. I'll need some time to work it out.
DavidHoul52 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 18:51
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK sometimes
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anyone is in or near the Yorkshire area, I do know a military airfield near Sherburn is offering (with the help of GATCO) an ATSOCAS brief on Sat 7 Mar at 11am It is aimed at all pilots from the ppl to the professional who may have to operate in class G. Landing fees waived (still have the insurance indemnity charge though).
I also know take up has been fairly disappointing with many pilots thinking it is 'just a name change'.
It is strictly ppr though if you're interested.
fabs is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 18:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK sometimes
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
126.5 Fenton
fabs is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 19:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fabs
... I also know take up has been fairly disappointing with many pilots thinking it is 'just a name change' ...
Which is hardly surprising - because 'just a name change' is pretty well what it will probably turn out to be, I'm sure.

I attended a similar "brief" a couple of weeks ago and failed to sense any significant changes for the user, except that DS will now be available under VFR as well as IFR ...

JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 17:01
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Excellent seminar at Church Fenton, was very good to hear the views of ATC. A few issues significant changes, which could surprise those who haven't read and researched the CD-Rom and information. We were told that the CAA are taking people who fail to acknowledge the changes very seriously, and that they must be reported and may have licenses revoked until they have completed training to understand fully what they are receiving, obviously I think this is at the extreme end of the spectrum.

Also particularly enjoyed flying into a RAF airfield :-)
L'aviateur is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 20:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by L'aviateur
We were told that the CAA are taking people who fail to acknowledge the changes very seriously, and that they must be reported and may have licenses revoked until they have completed training to understand fully what they are receiving, obviously I think this is at the extreme end of the spectrum.
What nonsense, I really can't see that happening - I wonder who was trying to put the frighteners on whom by suggesting that ... ?

Who gave the talk - military or civil ATC ?

JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 20:29
  #36 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
We were told that the CAA are taking people who fail to acknowledge the changes very seriously, and that they must be reported and may have licenses revoked until they have completed training to understand fully what they are receiving,
Eh? How will the CAA know that an individual has "failed" to acknowledge the changes? Who must report them?
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 20:42
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Senior Military ATCO, he advised that the CAA have asked them to report anyone who fails to have any knowledge of the changes to the CAA and advise them to land at the nearest airfield for rebriefing.
L'aviateur is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 20:58
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What absolutely laughable rubbish!

He must have been pulling your plonker - nobody with any nouse would take that seriously ...

JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 21:12
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
... it's just like politics these days - too much emphasis on the spin ... and not enough on the substance ...
Er ... have you ever actually tried being a politician?

Here's an experiment for you:

(1) Get yourself elected to something.
(2) Do something.
(3) Try and get the media interested in the substance.

Million to one on you'll fail, especially if whatever-it-is is good news. The only thing you have the remotest chance of getting the media to take an interest in is spin, or bad news, or silly party political squabbling. To be in with a really good chance you have to put all three into your press release.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 21:41
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What absolutely laughable rubbish!

He must have been pulling your plonker - nobody with any nouse would take that seriously ...
Well, unfortunately not everyone is as experienced and as knowledgable as you. But it seemed a fairly plausable action; despite the fact that the CAA doesn't actually seem to take a lot of action against poor airmanship and comms.
I have no reason or authority to argue with a senior military ATCO, but I do find it annoying that you would throw such a childishly worded comment without explaining or backing up your argument.

On another forum, comments from another seminar by the senior CAA implimentor for the new ATSOCAS has said that that no action would be taken against offenders.

I'm simply repeating what was said for the benefit of those who weren't able to attend a seminar.
L'aviateur is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.