NPPL (M) Information Please?

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Likes: 1
From: England
Pretty well every C150 and C152 flight is overweight and they have less performance than a C42 to start with.
Also remember that alot of so called UK microlights are actually certified to higher weights abroard.
Also remember that alot of so called UK microlights are actually certified to higher weights abroard.

Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,401
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Which makes them safe, if unlawful.
Hence an internationally agreed 600 kg limit for such aircraft would be no bad thing if and only if the associated pilot licensing remained out of the hands of the meddling €urocrats trying to strangle sub-ICAO flying with their pointless red tape.
Hence an internationally agreed 600 kg limit for such aircraft would be no bad thing if and only if the associated pilot licensing remained out of the hands of the meddling €urocrats trying to strangle sub-ICAO flying with their pointless red tape.
Last edited by BEagle; 4th February 2009 at 10:21.
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
From: Midlands
Very few advantages to a micro over a VLA. A VLA MCR01 / P300 etc will cruse at 130kn+, burn 16lph Mogas and you can typically lift 50kg more weight. You can add toys like CS props and full glass, but you are restricted to day VFR just like a micro.
Rod1
Rod1
Oh Shazbat!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, UK
My two penneth on the wind issue - 15kt is the C42 crosswind limit, although it can cope with a little more.
Confession time, it wasn't the crosswind limit that made me elect to learn in a C42, it was one of the few microlights for training on when I started that had a heater in it.




