Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Ultimate Controlled Airspace Infringement

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Ultimate Controlled Airspace Infringement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2008 | 17:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: UK
Ultimate Controlled Airspace Infringement

From the little white book that comes along with the GASIL, 19 May - 03 Aug Edition. Page 24

Piper PA 46 Malibu 13 Jul 08.

"Infringement of the LTMA, Heathrow Zone, Stansted Zone, and Farnborough Zone by a PA46 at 2000ft. Traffic info and avoiding action given. Separation lost. Departures were stopped at Heathrow, four a/c were broken off approach, one a/c was sent around. At Stansted one a/c was sent around and one a/c's take off aborted. Appropriate CAA action is being taken as a result of this incident".

I read it in stunned amazement.
timzsta is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 18:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Chasing Dreams
Absolutely stunned.
Jimmy Macintosh is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 18:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
What are you so stunned at?

That a Malibu pilot would make a mistake like the rest of us?
That a Malibu would be going off airways, and having to do their own navigation?
That the infringment could cause so much trouble?
That they are being prosecuted?

I'm not critising you, just simply wondering which part of the story you are stunned at.
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 19:04
  #4 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,116
Likes: 1,091
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
That a Malibu pilot would make a mistake like the rest of us?
There's mistakes, and there's MISTAKES!

Like the rest of us? Speak for yourself How many of the "rest of us" made a little MISTAKE! like this?
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 19:05
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
None of this is in any way remarkable. Obviously he didn't know about the controlled airspace.

The bit I would like to know is the pilot's history, training, etc.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 19:34
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: UK
I minor incursion into a CTR can occur to the best of us. To infringe two CTR's the LTMA and an ATZ in one flight.....
timzsta is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 19:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I minor incursion into a CTR can occur to the best of us. To infringe two CTR's the LTMA and an ATZ in one flight.....
Is certainly some doing!

And it was not me......
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 19:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: lincolnshire
A Grand Slam

I suppose that if you are going to make a b**lls up you might as well as do it in style... obviously just missed Gatwick... could have got the BAA triple there!
rauxaman is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 20:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: a flight level far far away ...
Shocking...
flightlevel1985 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 20:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Right here
None of this is in any way remarkable. Obviously he didn't know about the controlled airspace.
When the controlled airspace in question is what it was in this case, I think not knowing about it is a tad remarkable-ish after all...
bjornhall is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 20:32
  #11 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
I wonder what his excuse was.

I have seen first hand what is involved in such a situation. Watched over the shoulder of the Luton controller duiring the last visit to LATC when someone came straight down from Cranfield. Turned back just before the approach to Luton. Caused a lot of grief all around. Amazing how it affected flights miles away from him.

To do this on such a scale is something else and must have cost a few quid in delays I expect.
BRL is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 20:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 1
From: In the boot of my car!
To cause a problem at one airport by an infringement you can understand, but to cause infringements and diversions at three smacks of more.
Ie more on suspected security issues than infringements.

Maybe the guy lost it big time enough to worry the controllers that there was more to him than a simple infringement and getting it wrong?

But heathrow, Stanstead and Farnborough? I can understand heathrow Farnborough which are on each others doorstep but Stanstead??? what was he on a blind tour of London airports?

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 24th September 2008 at 21:07.
Pace is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 21:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Or perhaps he wasn't using his gps today, and was following dr, and did infact know about the controlled airspace, and was carefully avoiding it, but in fact thought he was somewhere else than where he actually was?

You might think it's hard to make multiple airspace busts, but if you think you are somewhere else other than where you are, then I suspect it's quite easy.

I would expect that the London based controllors see this on a fairly regular occasion.
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 21:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
Well done this man.

If you are going to do it, do it properly!!

In any event, probably a yank, they dont understand our airspace, hey what the hell, you call that an airport (Stansted) I've got a bigger airport than that in my back yard. What you mean, you got THREE of these things all within 40 miles of each other - have you fellas never heard of freeways.

Last edited by Fuji Abound; 24th September 2008 at 22:39.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 23:10
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 1
From: In the boot of my car!
Fuji

No ive worked it out all to do with the Swiss Hadron Collider. Mini Black holes.
The Guy bounced through one and ended up at Stanstead then another into Farnborough and finally another into Heathrow.

Do the Swiss know the problems they have unleashed ?

Pace
Pace is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2008 | 23:26
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Maders UK
occurence listings

It really looks like the Malibu pilot was somewhat overhorsed....during his marathon airspace infringement session. I wonder exactly what "approporiate CAA action" is being taken?

My personal favourite from the white booklet is the barnstorming stampe pilot on p27 who carried out a loop the loop at Gloucester during an overhead join, do you think he misinterpreted ATC's instructions? What's the betting a handlebar moustache was involved?

SB
scooter boy is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2008 | 06:27
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Maybe he was trying to see how many busts he could do before his engine packed up. This model does have a bit of a history on that front.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2008 | 07:24
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Maders UK
"Maybe he was trying to see how many busts he could do before his engine packed up. This model does have a bit of a history on that front".

... or before a wing fell off... some history there as well

SB
scooter boy is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2008 | 09:59
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Slightly more serous answer -

I looked at the details of an incident several years ago involving multiple infringements of TMA and CTZ airspace. It was a European pilot (not a Yank) who had filed an IFR plan and when picking up his clearance received a message like ' you can't fly that route IFR ' - So he didn't...

He said 'no problems I will depart VFR', which he did.

.... and then flew his original route 'VFR'!!!
mm_flynn is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2008 | 10:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
Maybe he was trying to see how many busts he could do before his engine
packed up. This model does have a bit of a history on that front".

... or before a wing fell off... some history there as well
Are they that bad?

Does the Meridian have the same wing design?
Fuji Abound is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.