Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Filser TRT800 Transponder - problems ... ?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Filser TRT800 Transponder - problems ... ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th July 2008 | 12:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine
Filser TRT800 Transponder - problems ... ?

I've just been a good little citizen and gone and got myself a Mode S Transponder - a Filser TRT800 to be precise - I believe several hundreds of which are already in service throughout Europe.

Except there seems to be a problem and the Mod has so far not been approved by the CAA.


Word is that they 'sometimes' don't respond in busy TMA environments.

Anyone else got one fitted/approved, and anyone else got any problems or tales to tell ?

Mr Not Happy
PH-UKU is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2008 | 13:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: england
I have one - no probs with the CAA.
Lurking123 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2008 | 16:04
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
The unit has the reputation for not being the best at that end of the market. I would recomend the Becker as being the best buy.
A and C is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2008 | 17:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
You would have to raise a Mod for the installation of this unit, do not assume that Filser would supply an STC to install this unit, the only company that cover most single engine aircraft with an STC is Trig.

L
L-Band is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2008 | 19:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: I sell sea shells by the sea shore
Have had a TRT800A since May. No probs.... so far. Friends in TC tell me it works fine...... so far

rgds BEX
BEXIL160 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008 | 00:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: England
i have the Filser transponder and radio, both work prefectly, the guys at
LX avionics Ltd. Radio transceivers, Mode S transponders, variometers, flight recorders
are very helpful,
tangovictor is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008 | 10:59
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Nine
We have raised a mod on it (it's going into a 172), and it is here that the CAA are raising issues. According to my friendly avionics engineer it may be something to do with the power supply in the unit.

BEX - what type is your unit installed in ?

Just say the CAA refused the mod (say, on the grounds of the unit being unreliable), does this mean that all other similar model TRT800s would have to be removed or returned to manufacturer for adjustment ? And would this apply across Europe ?

tangovictor - that's where I got it, through LX.
PH-UKU is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008 | 13:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: South of UK
TRT800 is undergoing investigations by the the manufacturer and Eurocontrol regarding performance issues, following negative experiences by a number of ANSPs in Europe. It could be that the CAA are holding off because of that.
Radarspod is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008 | 16:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: I sell sea shells by the sea shore
My TRT800A is in my very old, but cherished, Cessna 150.

The EASA mod paperwork (all 36 pages and 300 Euros) was done by the chap who fitted it for me, and the unit supplied by LX avioniocs, above.

Rgds BEX
BEXIL160 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008 | 20:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
My TRT800 works excellent.... In a permit aircraft so no CAA issues.
Service from LX avionics is absolutely fantastic.

Mate had a problem with his when a poor install saw the co-axial being departed from the antenna and got running high SWR and popped the output side of the transmitter. LX directed him to send it to Germany, 7 days later and a small bill for 48 euro and all was back in situ and working fine.

Good experience here, and works fine. Also, its small profile is excellent and is one of the very few units with the encoder built into the actual transponder itself.

Jon
jonkil is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2008 | 13:08
  #11 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
Moderator
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 21
From: Europe
I've just been a good little citizen and gone and got myself a Mode S Transponder - a Filser TRT800 to be precise - I believe several hundreds of which are already in service throughout Europe.
Oh no ..... you've succumbed
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Reply
Old 28th August 2008 | 21:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: South of UK
Here's why......

http://www.avionik.de/Grafix/PDF/EAS...008-0158_1.pdf

RS
Radarspod is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2008 | 11:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: london
TRS80 Transponder

We were also good little boys and fitted a TRS80 in our C-150 when the old mode A only one went unreliable. It seems we are affected by the AD so we're going to have to placard the aircraft and insert a note in the POH basically saying unless they say it's OK do not fly into airspace that requires a transponder and is mode S equipped because your shiny new mode S transponder is a piece of junk.
Anyone know what airspace in the UK apart from Heathrow Zone is currently affected?
BIGJ91 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2008 | 12:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
I should have thought that all people who have bought a Filser Mode S would be entitled to a full refund including fitting costs as the unit is clearly unfit for purpose...........

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2008 | 13:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
I should have thought that all people who have bought a Filser Mode S would be entitled to a full refund including fitting costs as the unit is clearly unfit for purpose...........
Better than that, they should pay for the cost of putting you in the position you would have been in had they not broken the contract, which a reasonable judge (I'm sure they all are!) might agree was that they should pay for you get a different unit from a different manufacturer supplied and fitted.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2008 | 17:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: Fareham
Good point Cusco.... But the question is who should pay? The story is a very complicated one.

In essence the Filser/Funkwerk transponder was approved against a published EASA standard and as far as I know, still complies with the standard.

The guys who designed built and installed the ground-based kit also have equipment that complies with the appropriate standards. But the two bits of kit still the two sometime have difficulty talking to one another. Something fishy with the standards (that by common consent were not the best written ever) you might think.

Don't be too quick to judge when you don't know all the facts. It could be that Filser/Funkwerk have a good case against the authorities.
Nipper2 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2008 | 17:00
  #17 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Cilboldentune, Britannia
This sounds like a good case for waiting for a couple of years before I install the mode S kit. I still can't understand how mode S is going to be useful until all flying vehicles have it. And, what advantages are there if I can't get a service from ATC or see other other aircraft?
jxk is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2008 | 17:13
  #18 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
A flight club in my area installed like 5 of them. They are crap.

There were so many problems with the unit itself, like rebooting in flight, resetting to 7000 automatic in flight etc... they fixed most things in the last months, but now you can't use them in Germany anymore.

If you give peanuts you get monkeys
sternone is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2008 | 17:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
This sounds like a good case for waiting for a couple of years before I install the mode S kit. I still can't understand how mode S is going to be useful until all flying vehicles have it. And, what advantages are there if I can't get a service from ATC or see other other aircraft?
In a couple of years time without Mode S you won't be able even to leave these shores for a spot of European Touring.

We took the 'head in the sand' approach with Mode S only a few years ago and installed a mode A/C replacement when our ancient TXPDR went t*ts up. Mode S seemed so far away and so expensive then...........

So now we'll be dumping a pretty new (in aviation terms) Mode A/C Garmin in favour of mode S.

All this Filsher cr*p has certainly steered me back towards Garmin..............

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2008 | 17:20
  #20 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Yeap - I like the Garmin kit but would be interested to know how good the TRIG unit is; this is my preferred option as it would slot straight into my KT76A (+ AK 350 encoder) position.
jxk is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.