Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cessna 152/150 CHECKLIST

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Cessna 152/150 CHECKLIST

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Apr 2008, 02:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Wrong Again!!!!

From DX Wombat;
Wrong! The POH for the 152 states 10degs flap for SHORT FIELD take off. No flap is required for a normal take off.
Dude, I'm looking at a copy of the C152 (1980 to be specific) and the takeoff checklist specifies 0-10 degrees.
The amplified procedure reads verbatim,
Normal takeoffs are accomplished with wing flaps 0-10 degrees. Using 10 degrees wing flaps reduces the total distance over an obstacle by approx 10%. Flap deflections over 10 degrees are not approved for takeoff. If 10 degrees wing flaps are used for takeoff, they should be left down untill all obstacles are cleared and a safe flap retraction speed of 60 KIAS is reached.
It may be your choice to use nil flap and take the extra distance, but I am definitely not wrong.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 05:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,102
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
MakeItHappenCaptain, if your take-off is limited by an obstacle then it is a short field take-off isn't it?
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 05:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What really makes me worry about these discussions is trying to figure out why a pilot would make the decision to take off thinking that that 10% difference in the climb over the obstacle is going to do the trick in one of those little bug smashers.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 08:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Short Field Take-off

Chuck, when you have only 540 metres with trees either end, which are a consideration, 10 degrees of flap in a C152 is worth setting. Clear the obstacle with a bit of padding, accelerate and retract the flap makes sense to me. To take off with zero flap makes no sense in that circumstance. The fact that it is a "puddle jumper" makes no difference. If the "P" charts say it is OK, remembering that they are factored, then there is no question it is safe. A darn site safer than taking off at 100000 tons heavier than the data used like SIA did in Auckland.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 09:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Aerocat
I believe that is a valid definition and why the POH has a 10 degree requirement in that case, but it also lists 0-10 degrees for a normal takeoff. Anyone able to prove me wrong?

The whole underlying theme of this thread is about reading the manual.
Some people would do well to actually start doing this.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 10:12
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 35
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi mate,

Visit pooleys.com thats where I got my C152 checklist.

Happy Flying
PRESIDENT2 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2008, 12:20
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,102
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MakeItHappenCaptain
Aerocat
I believe that is a valid definition and why the POH has a 10 degree requirement in that case, but it also lists 0-10 degrees for a normal takeoff. Anyone able to prove me wrong?
No but your statement has undergone a subtle change. In your original post you state that flap 10 is used for a normal take-off in the C152, which is half right (we never used any flap in ours.) The Wombat then replies that no flap is required for a normal take-off, which is entirely correct but not the full story. Your quote from the POH is simply saying that either 0 or 10 may be used for a normal take-off.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2008, 14:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
The Wombat flat out said I was wrong. Crap.

No but your statement has undergone a subtle change.
Similar to trying to get me to admit I'm actually conducting a short field takeoff?

Your school uses 0, mine used 10. I'm sure we can agree to use our own choices, but personally, I'm happy using the higher flap setting.
I won't be telling you you're wrong for doing it though. Nuff said.

Last edited by MakeItHappenCaptain; 2nd May 2008 at 11:51.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2008, 15:27
  #29 (permalink)  
The Original Foot
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh no, don't leave it there...
bigfoot01 is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2008, 15:29
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normal takeoffs are accomplished with wing flaps 0-10 degrees. Using 10 degrees wing flaps reduces the total distance over an obstacle by approx 10%. Flap deflections over 10 degrees are not approved for takeoff. If 10 degrees wing flaps are used for takeoff, they should be left down untill all obstacles are cleared and a safe flap retraction speed of 60 KIAS is reached.

If you use 10 degrees of flap for take off are you climbing with a higher nose up attitude than with 0 degrees of flap and is your airspeed any lower?
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2008, 22:35
  #31 (permalink)  
The Original Foot
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phew, I thought there was a chance we weren't going to get to the bottom of this one...
bigfoot01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.