CAA proposal to reduce fire cover..
Guest
Posts: n/a
CAA proposal to reduce fire cover..
..I think 
Have a gander at this consultation http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=1570
As far as I can tell it seem to spell the end of some of the Trumpton Airport Fire Brigade.
Be interested in an informed opinion, especially from Capt Flack, The Pugh Brothers, Mr and Mrs McGrew's son Barney et al inc Grub.
Sir George Cayley
Have a gander at this consultation http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=1570
As far as I can tell it seem to spell the end of some of the Trumpton Airport Fire Brigade.
Be interested in an informed opinion, especially from Capt Flack, The Pugh Brothers, Mr and Mrs McGrew's son Barney et al inc Grub.
Sir George Cayley
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just out of curiousity, has anyone ever been saved from an aircraft fire (resulting from the scenario painted in the consultation document where "a Cessna 152 lands and hits a Piper PA38") by airport firecrew?
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: england
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it won't see the end of the special category fire cover but it will change the way that it is regulated - in reality most of the special category airfields will probably continue as they are - the CAA have made them jump through the hoops already.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks to me - as the operator of an unlicenced airfield used for microlight aircraft training - that it is "licenced airfield for training" in all but name.
In other words, a list of CAA requirements to be checked by a CAA audit, at the airfield operator's cost.
All change for the same?
In other words, a list of CAA requirements to be checked by a CAA audit, at the airfield operator's cost.
All change for the same?
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just out of curiousity, has anyone ever been saved from an aircraft fire (resulting from the scenario painted in the consultation document where "a Cessna 152 lands and hits a Piper PA38") by airport firecrew?
VFE.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: england
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The most likely things to happen on an airfield are heavy landings, ground loops etc which hardly require fire cover.
As for rescuing people from a burning aircraft - within a few seconds there's not really much left - so either the occupants are able to get out unaided or they're not.
As for rescuing people from a burning aircraft - within a few seconds there's not really much left - so either the occupants are able to get out unaided or they're not.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maders UK
Age: 57
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The most likely things to happen on an airfield are heavy landings, ground loops etc which hardly require fire cover.
As for rescuing people from a burning aircraft - within a few seconds there's not really much left - so either the occupants are able to get out unaided or they're not."
Quite probably correct.
No disrespect intended here but...The firemen at my base airfield spend most of the day polishing their helmets
- in truth they do get involved in other duties such as jogging, cutting the grass, cleaning the fire engine, moving the fire engine (which is parked in the hangar and always obstructing the egress of my aircraft) and working out in the gym.
I am joking here
(before the righteous aviation fireperson's spokesperson descends on me) and they do much of the commercial ground crew type stuff at the airport.
It would appear that a civvy fireman's lot would involve far more frequent fire (of admittedly lower intensity).
SB
As for rescuing people from a burning aircraft - within a few seconds there's not really much left - so either the occupants are able to get out unaided or they're not."
Quite probably correct.
No disrespect intended here but...The firemen at my base airfield spend most of the day polishing their helmets
- in truth they do get involved in other duties such as jogging, cutting the grass, cleaning the fire engine, moving the fire engine (which is parked in the hangar and always obstructing the egress of my aircraft) and working out in the gym.I am joking here
(before the righteous aviation fireperson's spokesperson descends on me) and they do much of the commercial ground crew type stuff at the airport.It would appear that a civvy fireman's lot would involve far more frequent fire (of admittedly lower intensity).
SB
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The most likely things to happen on an airfield are heavy landings, ground loops etc which hardly require fire cover.
yes, an awful lot of time is spent hanging around, but when you need them, you definitely need them. Dont forget that an airfield fire service doesn't just deal with a fire situation.......
It would appear that a civvy fireman's lot would involve far more frequent fire (of admittedly lower intensity).
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a dreamworld!
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We think it's OK not to have fire services at every 1'000 metres of motorways, so why do we think it's necessary at every runway. Isn't the local fire service sufficient? Light aircraft accidents tend to be no worse that car accidents.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just out of curiousity, has anyone ever been saved from an aircraft fire (resulting from the scenario painted in the consultation document where "a Cessna 152 lands and hits a Piper PA38") by airport firecrew?
According to a presentation (which I attended) by a Govt Minister from the DfT, in London in November 2006, the DfT did research on this and found the answer to be zero. Specifically, no lives were actually saved by airport fire crew.
I don't recall the time period over which the data was collected but from vague recollection and the general context it was several decades.
I am not for or against airport fire crew; just reporting the above.
What I am against is mandatory ATC for any public instrument approach. This keeps GA utility value in the Middle Ages by making GPS approaches all but useless even if we had them. Currently, nearly every airport that has ATC also has an IAP.
According to a presentation (which I attended) by a Govt Minister from the DfT, in London in November 2006, the DfT did research on this and found the answer to be zero. Specifically, no lives were actually saved by airport fire crew.
I don't recall the time period over which the data was collected but from vague recollection and the general context it was several decades.
I am not for or against airport fire crew; just reporting the above.
What I am against is mandatory ATC for any public instrument approach. This keeps GA utility value in the Middle Ages by making GPS approaches all but useless even if we had them. Currently, nearly every airport that has ATC also has an IAP.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite the reduction in requirements hoped for by small airfields which train only one or two days a week and find that the cost of satisfying the current requirements far outweighs the additional safety margin created.
15 months between CAA visits becomes 24 months. Slight change in role for the firefighter.
15 months between CAA visits becomes 24 months. Slight change in role for the firefighter.
fire cover
"Isn't the local fire service sufficient? Light aircraft accidents tend to be no worse that car accidents."
Airport fire service must make response time of 3 mins maximum to a fixed wing incident, 2 mins for rotary. "Time" is crash alarm to foam production. Local authority cannot match this and fully admit to minimal specialised knowledge about aircraft, they will assist but choose to stay clear. They don't have any brief about undercarriages, ejector seats, ballistic parachutes etc. They will be the first to admit that they are not the experts.
Please bear in mind that at the majority of GA airfields the fire crew are already on site as engineers, ops , maintainence etc. ie multi- tasked. Just cos a list of lives saved FROM FIRE can't be produced does not mean to say that the actions of the RFFS has not saved anybody. Prompt application of qualified first aid, making safe of wreckage, dealing with fuel spills, preparedness for worst case scenarios and preservation of evidence for AAIB inquiry purposes have all assisted at aircraft accidents and are all elements of the Airport Fire Service role.
"I wouldn't dream of telling you how to be a pilot, don't tell me how to save your ass."
Airport fire service must make response time of 3 mins maximum to a fixed wing incident, 2 mins for rotary. "Time" is crash alarm to foam production. Local authority cannot match this and fully admit to minimal specialised knowledge about aircraft, they will assist but choose to stay clear. They don't have any brief about undercarriages, ejector seats, ballistic parachutes etc. They will be the first to admit that they are not the experts.
Please bear in mind that at the majority of GA airfields the fire crew are already on site as engineers, ops , maintainence etc. ie multi- tasked. Just cos a list of lives saved FROM FIRE can't be produced does not mean to say that the actions of the RFFS has not saved anybody. Prompt application of qualified first aid, making safe of wreckage, dealing with fuel spills, preparedness for worst case scenarios and preservation of evidence for AAIB inquiry purposes have all assisted at aircraft accidents and are all elements of the Airport Fire Service role.
"I wouldn't dream of telling you how to be a pilot, don't tell me how to save your ass."
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deepest Warwickshire
Age: 47
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a share in a Jodel, which caught fire at an airfield without fire cover. The local brigade took 8 minutes to get there. Relying on you local brigade therefore is not ideal, unless the airfield is near a full-time station.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK, right of centre
Age: 52
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know at our small airfield, special cat, we will continue with the CAA. devil you know kind of thing for us, and also as far as i know, whilst under the CAA you don't have health and safety exec. They would be a whole lot worse. Besides, we still have a duty of care to our customers / members anyway - at least under the CAA standards you stand a chance in court.
KK
KK
