Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

another Garmin 296 question

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

another Garmin 296 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2007, 20:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another Garmin 296 question

If I buy a secondhand GPS296 in the USA and bring it to Europe will the geographic data be missing?
I can upload an Atlantic (European) database but that's just the aviation data afaik. So will the underlying geographic info still be missing?
That would not be satisfactory.

Maybe someone has tried this .....

I have done the reverse, flying in the US with a Garmin Pilot III bought in Europe. While the American aviation database was easily loaded on it, the geographic details were largely missing.

Bluebeard777 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2007, 21:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apparently, you can only have either the US date or European
and its not viable to change
I got a great deal on a new 296, with people wanting the 496
which offers very little more to Europeans than the earlier version
for a whole lot less
tangovictor is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2007, 08:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Expat Kiwi living in London
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am shortly going to be replacing my old Pilot III with a 296 - where did you get your best price on the 296 and how much was it? I've seen the current offered price on Harry's website but have not yet called to see whether they will discount from there. Thanks.
Southern Cross is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2007, 13:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have found AFE Oxford to offer an amazing service
I went in to buy a data transfer cable for my 296, as they didn't have it in stock, it was ordered, from another branch, and amazingly it arrived the very next day, with no postal charge, well done AFE, shame other companies don't care as much for there customers
tangovictor is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2007, 16:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 186
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck with the discount Southern Cross, please let us know if you have any luck. It does seem that there is some price fixing going on with Garmin product and I don't like it much. Does it happen in the rest of the world or is it just rip-off Britain?
Tone is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 07:07
  #6 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
Age: 51
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which offers very little more to Europeans than the earlier version
I was planning getting a 496, but since reading your post and thinking about it, for us euroguys what is the differences in getting a 496 to a 296 besides the price
sternone is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 09:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sternone, I believe the differences are, in the US theres taxi safe
not available in Europe yet
the image regenerates a milli sec quicker
weather etc can be uploaded not available in Europe
I personally could justify paying the extra, especially when you can get so many free waypoint etc downloads for the 296, from >

http://www.pipercub.org.uk/
tangovictor is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 09:22
  #8 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
Age: 51
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the image regenerates a milli sec quicker

I personally could justify paying the extra, especially when you can get so many free waypoint etc downloads for the 296, from >
Is the 296 slow ? Is there a nice (viewable) speed difference in generating maps between 496 and 296 ?

You mean you have the free waypoints you upload on the 296 included in the 496 by default ?

Is battery life better on the 496 ? Is the road navigator also included in the 296 ?

thanks
sternone is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 09:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 296 isn't slow, the 496 as i said is a milli sec faster
496 comes with road nav
296 its extra
battery life ? id imagine its the same, but 99.9% would hard wire it
so the battery would only come into its own, should the wiring fail
tangovictor is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 09:35
  #10 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
Age: 51
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the waypoints you add on your 296 ? Do you need to add them also on the 496 or are they included ?

Thanks
sternone is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 16:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sterneone, sorry I don't own a 496 to know, if the waypoints etc are included
http://www.pipercub.org.uk/
is the link, with all the free downloads
tangovictor is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2007, 23:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 496 does come with VRPs and obstacles and also many, (but not necessarily all,) of Cub's downloadable waypoints. The screen redraw rate is apparently five times faster than any other GPS on the market and
allegedly almost makes the 'panel' page suitable for real time instrument flying ( no pitch info though, and therefore not necessarily something to be recommended except in extremis)
flybymike is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 01:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not sure about 5 times faster, i'd give garmin a call, and ask
tangovictor is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2007, 17:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have my doubts about the "5 times faster" claim myself, I took this information directly from the Garmin website on trust. I suspect that even if it were true at the time the claim was made, it is no longer true in view of the recent plethora of new units on the market,
flybymike is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.