The end of ADF at last?
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
There is a slight problem: if overlay approaches were authorised in the UK (which would be great but is highly unlikely) then many IFR approved GPS installations would not be able to use them. My KLN94 uses a version of the Jepp database on which many tracks are missing, and often only the final approach track is shown.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
The 430/530 approach representations are generally pretty good - BUT in the UK they are still not "Overlay Approaches" in the sense they exist in the USA. For example (from memory) mine going into Shoreham doesn't have the various step down fixes as waypoints so you would still "need" the DME to give you this information. In a true Overlay Approach these waypoints would be in the database.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
If it's an authorised overlay approach, the Jepp chart will have a waypoint reference printed next to each waypoint. For example, the initial fix will have something like IF06 next to it which will correspond with a fix in the database of the R NAV equipment you are using. Of course, you sbould chect the tracks and distances or Lat/Longs of each waypoint in the database from the chart before flying the approach.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I've tried to track down references for the dropping of the ADF requirement on the CAA site. But can only find this!!
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/FOD200004.PDF
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/FOD200004.PDF




