Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

bose x headset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th August 2007 | 00:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: the moon
bose x headset

for anyone who has the above headset - what do you think of it?

also, cheapest place I've seen advertising it is Sporty's pilot shop in America for $599 or $699

Would it be worth buying from there or does any1 know anywhere cheaper to purchase this headset?

Regards
A330 Dreamer is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 07:13
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, England
Bose X

Hi A330 Dreamer,

I have the Bose X and find it excellent.

Before buying from Sporty's, check how much you will have to pay in customs duty, it might make it as dear as buying here, especially since the firm that advertises on the back of the magazines is offering them for £587.

Broomstick.
BroomstickPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 09:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
A330,

Where exactly did you see the prices you quote for Sportys? I've just looked on their website and they're quoting $999 ...

FF
FullyFlapped is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 10:53
  #4 (permalink)  
DB6
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
From: Glen Prosen, Scotland
Broomstick, small print = +VAT. (£690)
A330, bought them, used them, flogged them. Not crap but nowhere near worth £700. I think they come with a 30 day trial arrangement so don't throw away the packaging. Depending on what you fly you will need more passive protection than the Bose offers (not very good at high frequencies). Lots of threads on this, try a search.
DB6 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 11:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Shropshire, England
I purchased a Bose X headset earlier in the year, having used Dave Clark's for many years. The difference in performance is dramatic, it is without doubt the best headset I've ever used.

The noise-cancelling performance when you turn on the battry pack has to be experienced to be believed. They are also extreamly light to wear and therefore comfortable for longer trips.

There're expensive, but what cost do you place on your hearing. Best purchase I've made in a long time.

I bought mine from a well know retailer north of the border as I've always had excellent customer service from them and I know if I have any problems with them, there won't be an issue in replacing or sorting out the problem - something worth factoring-in to a circa £700 purchase. Hope that helps.
Letdown is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 14:19
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
The Bose X is the best headset around by a big margin.

If you can afford it, it's worth the money. If you can't afford it then...

I have four of them.

But it's not something you can lend to careless people. It's not built like a tank. If you want something for club use, and generally kicking around, get a £200 David Clarke. They are crap but they will take the abuse of everyday GA usage by people who think a headset is £20.

Don't buy a used one though. Bose had a problem with the mikes, from about 1999 to about 2003. They still work (better than other headsets) but not as well as the current model.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 15:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I have a couple of Bose X headsets and as IO says they are the best thing money can buy. I have used them in everything from Open Cockpit to a CJ1.

I use the noise canceling non aviation headsets with my iPod and for airline travel as well.

They do not have the best passive reduction but then thats not what they were designed for! They weigh nothing and are a tough enough for a considerate owner but certainly not for a flying school.

Mine has more than 2000hrs of use on it and still looks like the day I bought it.
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 15:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
The noise-cancelling performance when you turn on the battry pack has to be experienced to be believed.
I do wonder about this......is it real or just percived? Most headsets have very good passive annuncation, and the ANR on them simply is the cherry on the cake....it adds a little more, to the already good annuncation. So when you switch on the ANR, you get a little less noise, but nothing earth shattering. Your annuncation goes in two steps....1. Putting on the headset, and 2. Turning on the ANR.

On the Bose X the passive annuncation isn't great at all, but the ANR does an excellent job when you turn it on. The effect is dramatic, because it goes from very little annucation to very good in one jump.

Having used both the Bose and DC's I don't think the Bose X has any better annuncation than my current headset (DC20-10XL)....but the effect of turning on the ANR on the Bose is much more dramatic, than on the DC's. Bose don't produce any figures for their annuncation, and I presume this is because it would show that their annuncation isn't any better than anyone else's.....it's just a matter of perception. Which ever seeing those figures, it will remain just a guess, but that's my take on it.

Comfort is another issue though. I accept that the DC20-10XL's that I use are much more comfortable than most of the other DC's, but the only significant advantage that the Bose has over them in terms of comfort is the fact that the Bose is smaller and lighter in weight. Both are quite comfortable to wear for awhile, although as I say, I do accept that most DC's have a much higher clamping force than I'm used to on the 20-10XL's.

You pay your money and take your choice. At the end of the day, I've yet to come across someone who bought the Bose and was unhappy with them, which does say a lot. If you intend flying long term, then buy the best headset that you can afford. When I bought my headset in 2002 (Just out of warrenty this summer!) they were significantly more expensive than the Bose are now. But I've had five years of excellent use, without any problems. The headset looks and functions as it did the day I got it. I've no reason to suspect I won't get another 5 years of happy use. Writting the cost off over ten years (perhaps more) means that the cost really isn't a big factor in your flying. So pay for the best you can affort (rather then the best you can justify). Otherwise you'll spend years wishing you'd forked out the extra

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2007 | 15:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I've got 'em and love 'em. As others have indicated, turning on the ANR always brings a smile to my face. It's amazing how the noise just fades away. Importantly, however, you DO hear all the sounds of the airplane, so you don't fly in a 'cotton bowl'. Passive attenuation isn't great, but they have obviously been designed that way. What price your hearing......
172driver is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 00:05
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: the moon
thanks for that guys,

was in the transair shop today - liked the feel of them when I tried it on so might purchase it when next pay day comes around
A330 Dreamer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 15:26
  #11 (permalink)  

Life's too short for ironing
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, & Maryland, USA
Have a look at uflymike.com as well. A bit cheaper than the Bose X, and gets good compliments.
fernytickles is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 16:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
The Bose are very good indeed.

One thing which cropped up on one of the aircraft mailing lists, though, was that they're not intended for unpressurised high-altitude use. The official upper usage limit is 14,000ft and above that it's apparently not uncommon to suffer acoustic feedback. I've used our pair up to that pressure level without any problems, but I've never had them in use above there, so can't comment myself. Perhaps others have experience they could share.

Of course, if your aircraft is pressurised, it's not a worry. Actually, maybe that should be, WHILE your aircraft is pressurised it's not a worry.
Wrong Stuff is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 17:52
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Perfectly fine at FL180+. This is three sets in use at the time, dating from 1999 to 2003, and with mikes from 1999 to 2007.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 18:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
No probs at FL 150
172driver is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2007 | 22:06
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: the moon
I've not been higher than 8000ft!

dont think our cherokee can go much higher, akes about an hour to get there in the 1st place!

Being in the transair shop and having a look around and trying different sets on was making me want to buy it but thought I'd get the trusted Pprune feedback 1st before spending £680 on a headset
A330 Dreamer is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2007 | 15:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: 22S42W
Bose X

Does Bose X fit to the 737NG plugs or you must bye an adapter?
Becker Junior is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2007 | 17:25
  #17 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
Since i train on the gold old C152 i bought the David Clark 10.34 one, i'm definitly willing to buy some boseX in my own plane or if i move up to the glass warrior for my IR.. but i read about problems on BoseX on some older planes...

I must say that the David Clark 10.34 are great, i dont notice any headset.. i hope the bose-x are another step beyond. can anybody compare these please and let me know ? thanks
sternone is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2007 | 19:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Kent UK
A headset on my shopping list as well but there is something that bothers me...

Does all this fancy ANR interfere with the pilot's ability to hear an early warning noises from the engine?
digital.poet is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2007 | 19:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: UK
what verson of Bose X for C172 (1970's 1980's era)

My Wife has offered to buy me a pair for my Annerversary...

What is the version of the Bose X needed for a C172...

i.e. with the 2 x Jack Sockets (one for headphone one for mic)?

Are they good for use in the aircraft??

Thanks for the advise?
Caullystone is offline  
Reply
Old 29th August 2007 | 20:06
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: South East England
Sternone,

Both the instructors at my school have bose X, and I'm training in a C152 - so I doubt there is any problem there. I can hear them OK (in borrowed denali's) and they have no probs with ATC.

However, I can't say that I've ever noticed the ANR box, so they may be using them as passive only? I'll have to ask to see whether it's because of compatibility or choice (don't want to hear the student wittering on!).
Redbird72 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.