Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

KTEB runway incursion

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

KTEB runway incursion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2007, 20:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KTEB runway incursion

17 June - Teterboro

NTSB preliminary
barit1 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2007, 12:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only a pair of little airplanes with no one of importance on board

Sorry to see this moved to the Private Flying section.

Perhaps this event was not as newsworthy (unless Brangelina were to have been on board) as the recent deal at SFO -- however it is about as serious as an incursion gets without actually trading paint.

TEB Airport Diagram.

Could we please consider re-locating to ATC or Safety?

Z
Zeffy is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2007, 21:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
13 Aug - Yet another at KTEB.
Note the NTSB calls N336FX a "Cessna CL60" but it's actually a CL604 Challenger.
barit1 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2007, 01:19
  #4 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The findings were distributed by the US and UK authorities immediately after the report was published and are equally in the public domain.

Whenever such an incident occurs in which thare are factors affecting the "professional" side of things, i.e. ATC or commercial ops', we are appraised of them as soon as the investigational authorities are ready to publish their findings.

I would argue that to put the report here is the right ting to do, albeit a little to late, if it only encourages every pilot to take a second to absorb and if necessary, question an ATC clearance which either sounds questionable or they don't understand.
niknak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.